Jump to content

  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims


    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  

REVISED GERD / IBS CUE, March 23, 2011 decision


I was denied SC for IBS and GERD IN 2011. In 2019 I was awarded SC for GERD. This CUE  is for 2011, both GERD and IBS. There are some odd aspects regarding the 2011 decision, the way it was written and the C&P report and the way it was written. I've tried to present this as clearly as I can. Note: the decision contradicts itself. the decision also contradicts the C&P Report. Honestly, I think the rater just got confused because the C&P was so poorly written. *THIS CUE HAS NOT YET BEEN SUBMITTED*Please let me know what you think. Appreciate all comments and suggestions. Thanks.

11/19/19:  Uploaded additional C&P diagnoses and comments.  Uploaded 2019 C&P DBQ that resulted in SC for GERD. 

A lesson learned that I did not realize until today. In 2010, the C&P exam was for "Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), also claimed as colon polypectomy and Acid Reflux (GERD)". When I sent in "new evidence" in 2018, I sent it under "GERD" only. I should have submitted the new evidence under the exact same heading as was used in 2010.




2011 C & P GERD IBS diagnoses comments.pdf 2019 C & P Report resulting in SC GERD.pdf

Edited by Justaskpat
Uploaded 2011 C&P GERD/IBS diagnoses/comments and 2019 C&P DBQ that resulted in SC GERD.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

i offer no opinion on medical issues, i only offer formatting suggestions.

please check


go to the Draft Version Rbrogen has on Sept 8 2019, near bottom of page 4. It is his latest.

It is my opinion you need to change the top ref to 5109A instead of 5109. 5109 is about Medical Opinions, 5109A is about CUE.

Get rid of all emotional words, accusations, fluff statements.

get rid of the word YOUR.  Words like that are personal attacks in this context. you want the reviewer to be on your side and not feel like you are making this personal to them.

This is a legal attack on the VA. It needs to be concise and direct.

use ellipses instead of inserting whole paragraphs.

format your references and citations properly and consistently.

In your narrative doc. do the same. get rid of any inflammatory or accusatory words.

Instead of say "You FAILED to....."

Consider the requirements of 38 CFR bla blah was not met

or similar phrasing. words like failed, didn't etc are an accusation and they are in an opinion format. Don't do that!

do this for both of the CUE drafts you posted. I have not read the other yet, but I suspect it is similar to this one.


  • Like 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
3 hours ago, GeekySquid said:

or similar phrasing. words like failed, didn't etc are an accusation and they are in an opinion format. Don't do that!

Thanks for the advice. I used a template for the 3, so they all have similar issues. I'll work on it.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
4 hours ago, GeekySquid said:

use ellipses instead of inserting whole paragraphs.

GeekySquid, could you please point to where this would apply in the IBS CUE? It's is the shortest CUE I've written and I don't see where I've quoted a paragraph in it. I'm also confused about how to point out where they messed up without it sounding like I'm saying they messed up. For instance, when the examiner lumped IBS with GERD under one code and one exam, each should have been separate because there are 2 separate codes. How could I say that in a manner that does not sound like I'm saying they did it wrong? The initial template I was using came from Berta's reply to my MDD CUE, quite awhile back. I have TBI, so I'm having some memory and concentration issues. My wife has helped me with putting this all together. I wanted you to know that in case I sound confused at any point, it's not because I'm not paying attention. I made a list of evidence that will preceed the evidence itself in the final package. I did not realize I should refer to each piece of evidence in the body of the CUE as "Exhibit ABC" etc, I thought I could say "see evidence", but I can see how that may sound confusing, although I did put the evidence in the order it appears in the CUE. I kind of feel like I've done all my CUEs completely incorrect and have to start over... Berta made it sound much simpler than Rbrogen's. She said to keep it short and sweet. I am going to remove all the "person comment" type comments from the other CUEs, especially the MDD where I've already removed it, just haven't posted the new version.  Is this as clear as mud? I guess the first several sentences are my questions and the rest is general information. thanks

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
20 minutes ago, Justaskpat said:

could you please point to where this would apply in the IBS CUE

no i will not.

Instead I will say just cite the exact part of which ever law you are talking about that applies. for example if you were going to use 38 CFR 4.6

you would not include the entire thing


§ 4.6 Evaluation of evidence.

The element of the weight to be accorded the character of the veteran's service is but one factor entering into the considerations of the rating boards in arriving at determinations of the evaluation of disability. Every element in any way affecting the probative value to be assigned to the evidence in each individual claim must be thoroughly and conscientiously studied by each member of the rating board in the light of the established policies of the Department of Veterans Affairs to the end that decisions will be equitable and just as contemplated by the requirements of the law.

it takes up too much space in the actual CUE doc. You can attach it as a separate piece of evidence on it's own doc and appropriately titled. That doc title is how you cite it in your CUE doc for each piece of evidence.


you might include, if relevant, something like:

38 CFR 4.6 states in part  "...Every element in any way affecting the probative value to be assigned to the evidence in each individual claim must be thoroughly and conscientiously studied...to the end that decisions will be equitable and just as contemplated by the requirements of the law."

followed by

Dr. xxx records/notes/opines/states in (cite doc) "...blah blah blah..."; C&P exam says "...blah blah blah...".(writing exactly what the EVIDENCE says as it relates to 38 CFR 4.6. followed by) The requirements of 38 CFR 4.6 were not met.

You can choose to create a separate Narrative/Time Line type doc and add it as an Exhibit/Enclosure, fine. Just don't use emotional language. cite it like any other exhibit/enclosure inside your CUE doc. You can "explain things" more thoroughly if you feel the need.

Remember a CUE is a CLEAR and UNMISTAKABLE ERROR.  It should not take a detailed explanation for the reviewer to get your legal point. If it does you may not have a legitimate cue. you are probably relying on opinion/interpretation instead of legal fact or evidence. doing that will fail you every time in a CUE.

@RBrogen has a perfect example in his latest draft under presumption of soundness. He may choose to point out in a narrative that just filling out a form at induction does not qualify an issue as a pre-existing problem despite his C&P examiner denying based on just that exact situation.

Just remember just because we CAN do something, does not mean we SHOULD do it.


that is just a possible example and only if it applies to your claim. It does not matter what your evidence type is, just cite it properly and consistently.

Enclosure A, "Record_NAME" dated XX/XX/XXXX page 4 para 3 states "...blah blah blah" is the same as Exhibit B, Dr. XXX page 3 para 2 states "....blah blah blah..." for formatting purposes.

Though in truth 4.6 should be used in almost every possible CUE. It is fairly sure that if the rater made an error they did not follow 4.6 and possibly 4.2 ( @RBrogen has a great example of how to cite both in a single sentence in his latest draft from today).

You should list all the Enclosures/Exhibits at the bottom of your CUE doc just like you do with any business letter.

as I suggested, go read that other doc. If you don't like that doc (it is a good doc!) look at the CUE thread from dawsonatl.

In there is a set of suggestions I wrote for dawsonatl.

I did  that because I had the time; what I found out from posting it, is that it set an expectation from others that I would do the same for them. I have had 30 PM's asking me to do the same for them.

I just don't have that kind of time. I will not research all the possible illnesses a vet might have. I will not dig into thousands of pages of someones C-files, and I will not send 50 messages back and forth trying to get someone to post a redacted version of some file in their possession.

I am not your father Luke!!!!! (if you don't get that reference you are way too young).

I will not tell you the words to use. I will critique the words you do use.

you must write for yourself.

word choice matters.

you don't want to have it read like a personal attack.

you don't want anything to read like an opinion.

you don't want anything but concrete statements.

Take what i wrote and read your doc for those type flaws.

read what I wrote here, dollars to donuts every place I write the word YOU, you as the reader take it personal even though it applies to the YOU in a general sense; people read it as an attack on them personally. PEOPLE don't like that and can get testy about it. Getting the reviewers back up is not in the best interest of getting a favorable outcome. Telling them they "failed" cuts to the quick.

This is not to be mean. This is to help you, the vet, learn to format and write YOUR CUE.

It does not help you learn if others write it for you.

You must be your own best advocate!!!!!!! Teaching a man to fish and all that.

Think of it like taking a class. If you don't learn you get a zero.

If you have a legitimate CUE I suspect it involves a chunk of money.

If you get mad at me for not writing it for you, and take the zero, fine with me. Not getting that money is all on you. Getting the money is all on you. You will do the work if you want that money. I suspect you really want that money.

Does that sound harsh? it is just reality. I don't get paid for this stuff, I don't want to get paid for this stuff, and I REFUSE to be expected to be the person who will do homework for other people. you are not the only person I have said this too. In fact there are at least 3 people in this thread who I have said the same thing too. I think the other 27 are either mad or busy trying to reformat their own claims; maybe both.

When you figure out what has to be in a CUE and what SHOULD NOT BE in a CUE you can then help others learn what to write. At that point if you have the time and interest to write CUE's for others, NIFTY, but I doubt that will last long.

I am willing to bet in the future I will see a post like this from you to some other vet. you might make it nicer. Good for you. I assume you are an adult and don't need me to hold your hand or sugar coat things to avoid hurting your feelings. You might think another path is more successful. Good for you; It is your choice of what path to take. I would even applaud you for being nicer than I am.

Please, take my suggestions as you will, in whatever way works best for you; the person you not the general you. Work your doc's one at a time. Post your drafts. Incorporate any suggestions you accept until YOU are happy with your doc. Then move to the next one.

There are many people here that are willing to help. to review. to suggest. to compliment or to pan your draft. If you can get her attention @Berta is the Queen of CUE. She is also knee deep in several swamps and is a very busy advocate on multiple issues. I don't speak for her, but her input is invaluable. We are lucky to have her experience, strength, avid support of veterans and spouses, and a willingness to share them as her life allows. We cannot ask for more, and I for one am grateful for what she chooses to share.

If you post drafts I will comment as I can. I do wish you the best possible outcome from your CUE's.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0


Be sure to look up the laws in effect at the time the decision was made. The VA may have made changes since then.

This example is from current law, but might have been in effect back then. It pertains to how they combine (or prohibit combining) certain codes together. It might impact your situation.

§4.114   Schedule of ratings—digestive system.
Ratings under diagnostic codes 7301 to 7329, inclusive, 7331, 7342, and 7345 to 7348 inclusive will not be combined with each other. A single evaluation will be assigned under the diagnostic code which reflects the predominant disability picture, with elevation to the next higher evaluation where the severity of the overall disability warrants such elevation.


If the VA overlooked or ignored evidence, consider including 4.2 and 4.6 into your complaint. Don't speculate that is was overlooked. If the evidence in your favor can be tied to a law or reg, you need to indicate the impact it would have had if included.


In one of my older claims, the VA claimed I did not have evidence of a certain "chronic" condition in service. I had plenty of evidence of it, but it was just not labeled as "chronic".


Another thought not related to CUE.  You indicated taking celexa for anxiety. Meds like that can negatively impact one's ability to function normally in the sack. If this happened to you and still happens, it might be worth considering filing a claim for it. If you win, it's an SMC-K award. Doesn't go toward your combined rating, but could mean about $100/month more. 


Wish I could provide more help, but I can't think as well as I used to. I hope this information is helpful.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Tinnitus comes in two forms: subjective and objective. In subjective tinnitus, only the sufferer will hear the ringing in their own ears. In objective tinnitus, the sound can be heard by a doctor who is examining the ear canals. Objective tinnitus is extremely rare, while subjective tinnitus is by far the most common form of the disorder.

      The sounds of tinnitus may vary with the person experiencing it. Some will hear a ringing, while others will hear a buzzing. At times people may hear a chirping or whistling sound. These sounds may be constant or intermittent. They may also vary in volume and are generally more obtrusive when the sufferer is in a quiet environment. Many tinnitus sufferers find their symptoms are at their worst when they’re trying to fall asleep.

        • Like
    • Precedent Setting CAVC cases cited in the M21-1
      A couple months back before I received my decision I started preparing for the appeal I knew I would be filing.  That is how little faith I had in the VA caring about we the veteran. 

      One of the things I did is I went through the entire M21-1 and documented every CAVC precedent case that the VA cited. I did this because I wanted to see what the rater was seeing.  I could not understand for the life of me why so many obviously bad decisions were being handed down.  I think the bottom line is that the wrong type of people are hired as raters.  I think raters should have some kind of legal background.  They do not need to be lawyers but I think paralegals would be a good idea.

      There have been more than 3500 precedent setting decisions from the CAVC since 1989.  Now we need to concede that all of them are not favorable to the veteran but I have learned that in a lot of cases even though the veteran lost a case it some rules were established that assisted other veterans.

      The document I created has about 200 or so decisions cited in the M21-1.   Considering the fact that there are more than 3500 precedent cases out there I think it is safe to assume the VA purposely left out decisions that would make it almost impossible to deny veteran claims.  Case in point. I know of 14 precedent setting decisions that state the VA cannot ignore or give no weight to outside doctors without providing valid medical reasons as to why.  Most of these decision are not cited by the M21.

      It is important that we do our due diligence to make sure we do not get screwed.  I think the M21-1 is incomplete because there is too much information we veterans are finding on our own to get the benefits we deserve

      M21-1 Precedent setting decisions .docx
      • 5 replies
    • Any one heard of this , I filed a claim for this secondary to hypertension, I had a echo cardiogram, that stated the diagnosis was this heart disease. my question is what is the rating for this. attached is the Echo.

      • 7 replies
    • Need your support - T-shirts Available - Please buy a mug or a membership
      if you have been thinking about subscribing to an ad-free forum or buying a mug now would a very helpful time to do that.

      Thank you for your support
      • 18 replies
    • OK everyone thanks for all the advice I need your help I called VSO complained about length of time on Wednesday of this week today I checked my E benefits and my ratings are in for my ankles that they were denying me 10% for each bilateral which makes 21% I was originally 80% now they’re still saying I’m 80% 

      I’m 50% pes planus 30% migraine headaches 20% lumbar 10% tinnitus and now bilateral 21% so 10% left and right ankle Can someone else please do the math because I come up with 86% which makes me 90 what am I missing please help and thank you
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines