Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

New SMC rating?

Rate this question


ArmChairRanger

Question

I am currently rated SMC (L-1) Entitled to special monthly compensation under 38 U.S.C. 1114, subsection (l) and 38 CFR 3.350(b) on account of loss of use of both feet from 01/2018.

I had submitted a claim for sleep apnea based on weigh gain and submitted an examination for permanent need for aid and attendance to show that I could not exercise properly. The sleep apnea claim was denied but the VA approved a second SMC (L-1) Entitled to special monthly compensation under 38 U.S.C. 1114, subsection (l) and 38 CFR 3.350(b) on account of being so helpless as to be in need of regular aid and attendance from 08/2019.

Do you have to submit a claim for additional SMC based on the new rating or should that be automatic?

Found this information on asknod.org.

The easiest way to get to R1 is the most obvious- §3.350(e)(1)(ii). You start at SMC L. If you are entitled to Aid and attendance, you are awarded SMC L #1. If you also lose the use of  both your upper or lower extremities, or an upper and a lower extremity, you get another SMC L- #2. Two SMC Ls or any combination of of two Ls, Ms, or Ns gives you a bump to SMC O. SMC N ½  with a K will too. But-here comes the legal pyramiding- if you have two of any of the rates between L and N, with no condition being counted twice, and one of the ratings is for Aid and Attendance, you advance to SMC R 1 automatically.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

First off, you are stating that you have two L-1 ratings. That should be stated as an L-1 for the loss of use of two feet, and as an L-2 for the second L award for the A&A.

In any case, The L-1 award for loss of use of two feet and the L-2 award for the A&A should get you to the O rating and therefore the A&A would automatically become R-1, unless the need of A&A included your loss of use of two feet. If indeed, the feet were used to determine the need for A&A, that would be considered as pyramiding and you would be given an M award instead of the R-1.

You need to re read your decision and see exactly what disability was used in the determination of the need of A&A. If your loss of use of twa feet was not used in the determination of the need of A&A you need to appeal that decision!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

James Cripps is one of the most knowledgeable, if not the most knowledgeable hadit member, and it sounds like you have been given good advice.  I do take exception, however, to the advice given on another forum suggesting, "you advance to R1 automatically".  

    I am not competent to opine on advanced levels of SMC, and would suggest you discuss this with a knowledgeable Veterans law firm such as CCK law, who often post information which helps Veterans.  

    I found no regulation suggesting an "automatic" advance in ratings.   While it IS possible that VA advance your rating without any action on your part, its also true that VA is supposed to award any SMC without any intervention on your part also, and we all know that VA does not always grant SMC even when the Veteran meets all the eligibility criteria.  Instead, the Veteran would need to apply for additional benefits, such as higher levels of SMC if. they were not already awarded.  I think its a mistake to think "VA will automatically" increase your rating, when my experience has been the VA automatically likes to delay, deny, or lowball benefits "automatically" awarding far less than the Veteran deserves.  

     Generally, Veterans need to fight for their benefits, and assuming they will be awarded automatically is much more likely to result in disappointment.  Instead, I recommend you file for any benefits you feel entitlted to, including R1.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Community Owner

I have to agree with you both. " I do take exception, however, to the advice given on another forum suggesting, "you advance to R1 automatically".  If someone catches the SMC it may seen like its automatic. Most times like with everting else you have to tell the VA. When I had my knee replacement they awarded SMC for three months than took it away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

If you are waiting on VA to "automatically" advance your rating to R1, you may be waiting a very, very long time, "even if" you already meet the applicable criteria.  If in doubt, apply for it, sooner rather than later.  

For example, whenever the Veteran meets the criteria with a single 100 percent disability plus additional disabilities that combine to 60 percent seperate and distinct, the VA is supposed to adjuticate and award SMC S, when ever the single 100 percent rating is awarded.  

However, in this forum multiple, multiple Veterans have complained they met this criteria and VA "did not" automatically award SMC S, and then, after they applied, at least some of these got the award.  

If you expect the VA to "scan your medical records" daily to see if you now have met the criteria for a higher level of SMC, you are likely to be disappointed.  

At least one reason:  For example, you may be getting Aid and Attendance care "from a relative" and VA may well not even be aware that you even meet SMC L (aid and attendance) criteria, because I doubt if your relative(s) will chart this on your medical records that you have been performing needed ADL's.  

When you apply for SMC (S) or SMC (L) Aid and attendance, the application is done on a form which generates a C and P exam:

https://www.vba.va.gov/pubs/forms/vba-21-2680-are.pdf

While VA "is not requiured" to do a c and p exam for every Veteran who applies for an increase in benefits, its interesting to note that a c and p exam is generated whenver the Veteran applies for SMC S or SMC L.  

The c and p exam may be "automatic" when you apply for Smc S or SMC L, but the award is far from automatic.  

 

 

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ShrekTheTank went up a rank
      Contributor
    • kidva went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use