Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Need Your Advice

Rate this question


donnieragsdale

Question

Trying to assist my mother-in-law.

Her husband participated in "operation crossroad" nuke tests "able and baker"

He had kidney cancer and it was removed.

Subsequently died about a year later.

Autopsy stated "multisystem failure".

Autopsy also noted that the loss of the cancerous kidney began the downward spiral that resulted in his death. It noted that everything began with his remaining kidney not being able to assume the load of the lost kidney.

He had never asked for service connection for anything from the VA. She now is unable to keep her meager house warm without family assistance.

My questions:

Isn't kidney cancer persumed service connected for atomic vets?

Did he have to be service connected for kidney cancer before he died or can the VA assign service connection subsequent to his death and provide financial assistance for his widow now if she makes the request?

Will it be a waste of time to try.

Have others gained service connection after the death of their spouse?

Your excellent advise is welcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

she can also apply to the Department of Justice under the RECA act, there are some cancers that are considered presumptive for exposure to the tests, if his is one of them, the feds are paying a lump sun of 75,000 and it has no effect on VA benies she might be entitled to, she can file for DIC benefits if the cancer is related to the experiments. If she has low level income she may also be entitled to a widows pension lets say she's one of the widows that get about 500 a month SS, then they will give her the difference between NSC pension and the SS payment

It doesn't hurt to ask all they can do is say no, but it sounds to me like she has a valid claim

http://www.usdoj.gov/civil/torts/const/reca/about.htm this is the RECA website

100% SC P&T PTSD 100% CAD 10% Hypertension and A&A = SMC L, SSD
a disabled American veteran certified lol
"A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replys.

We tried the DOJ for his case and was denied. They said that the Kidney Cancer was not one of the cancers they had on their listing.

We will submit the claim to the VA and see if they can help.

In her husband's case, he was a seaman assigned to one of the ships that monitored the tests and after each explosion, he helped the testing civilians take equipment aboard the ships to take readings of different levels of the test ships (ground zero). The took gieger counter readings and photos of the test animals that had been placed aboard the test ships prior to the detonations.

His cancer developed years after the exposure and took his life before he could perfect a claim to the VA.

Mainly, I wanted to know if his right to be "service connected" died with him or if his wife still has a right to try to connect it now after his death.

thank you

Don

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

if they don't recognize it as being related to the tests, then it is doubtful that they will SC it now. The DOJ uses the same lists the VA will use, at this point she may have a claim for a widows pension if he served during a war time period and it will then become a needs based payment but if she is getting a really low amount of SS it may add some money to her overall position good luck

100% SC P&T PTSD 100% CAD 10% Hypertension and A&A = SMC L, SSD
a disabled American veteran certified lol
"A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I replied yesterday to this under Atomic vets -widows question-post-I could not find your original post-

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here it is:

I replied to this and my post vanished -at same time I got unexpected company-last night and now I cannot find where this question was----

I believe it was regarding kidney disease causing death- claimed due to radiation exposure?

The poster said he thought the condition was presumptive-

The presumptive conditions are all found at 38 USC 1112©-38 CFR 3.309 (d)

however this list is only for veterans who participated in a radiation risk activity- such as:

occupation of Hiroshima or Nakasaki between August 6, 1945 and July 1, 1946,

or were exposed to ionized radiation while a POW in Japan

or participated in undergroud nuclear tests at Amchitka Alaska prior to Jan 1, 1974, or

service at gas diffusion plants in Paducah Kentucky at that time or

in Pormouth plants or at area K 25- Oak Ridge Tennesee.

Other situations can help an atomic veteran establish service connect-these are often very difficult claims-

a strong medical opinion of the nexus helps considerably- however the VA has to obtain a radiation estimate from the DOD to assess the nature and dosage of radiation the veteran was exposed to-

My husband, after Vietnam, was a Nuclear Power Plant operator-

his exposure was carefully documented probably many times a day- for ten years-

he had no residual disablities from all that-

Those records are most surely still with the plant and the feds-

However- it can become problematic when a vet or the VA tries to find the records of their radiation exposure sometimes- in the military-

but even when these records are found they most often contain documentations of low dosages-too low to cause potential health problems.

Also some of the risk activity of atomic vets remains classified- another problem in proving a claim like this-

I dont know where this post was yesterday-

Did this veteran have any other potential disability for possible service conected- that could have contributed to his death -or caused it-( the kidney disease)

The widow should certainly file a claim- but should raise both the radiation exposure issue as well as any other possible reason that the VA should service connect his death.

You didnt give us too much info------

but mentioned she is at very low income- if he was wartime ( just wartime service-not necessarily war service) and she has very low income, the VA will certainly give her a wartime pension- depending on all other eligibility factors-of course-

The 21-526 form will cover both the pension decision and the service connected death claim.

Radiation claims- unless within the above criteria depend on the REM dosages in service (documented) and strong medical evidence to support this exposure and the SC disablity or death.

--------------------

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 3 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use