Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules
- 0
-
Tell a friend
-
Recent Achievements
-
Our picks
-
Are all military medical records on file at the VA?
RichardZ posted a topic in How to's on filing a Claim,
I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful. We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did. He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims. He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file. It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to 1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015. It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me. He didn't want my copies. Anyone have any information on this. Much thanks in advance.-
- 3 replies
Picked By
RichardZ, -
-
Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
Tbird posted a record in VA Claims and Benefits Information,
Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL
This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:
Current Diagnosis. (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)
In-Service Event or Aggravation.
Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”-
- 0 replies
Picked By
Tbird, -
-
Post in ICD Codes and SCT CODES?WHAT THEY MEAN?
Timothy cawthorn posted an answer to a question,
Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability ratingPicked By
yellowrose, -
-
Post in Chevron Deference overruled by Supreme Court
broncovet posted a post in a topic,
VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.
They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.
This is not true,
Proof:
About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because when they cant work, they can not keep their home. I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason: "Its been too long since military service". This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA. And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time, mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends.
Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly. The VA is broken.
A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals. I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision. All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did.
I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt". Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day? Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Post in Re-embursement for non VA Medical care.
broncovet posted an answer to a question,
Welcome to hadit!
There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not. Try reading this:
https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/
However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.
When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait! Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?" Not once. Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.
However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.
That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot. There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.
Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.
Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344
Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Question
free_spirit_etc
I am thinking that I should at least get my initial DIC claim in in the near future -- so I can start the process that will take some time.
My husband had a claim pending for lung cancer at the time of his death (from lung cancer)
But it says that the DIC application is also an application for accrued benefits.
So that will take into account his lung cancer claim. If it is awared - then I would get DIC and accrued for that.
However, there were also a couple of other claims that we were going to try to process:
1. His right shoulder -- which was claimed at retirement and denied because his SMRS did not show an incident that would have caused it. (Claim based on the fact that he was in the service for 28 years - they FOUND something wrong with his shoulder -- it most likely happened in the service --as he CLAIMED it PRIOR to retirement).
2. Cervicle Strain -- he also claimed this at retirement -- but theycouldnt find much wrong (it IS in the SMRS) -- but they something at C3-4 -- but didn't think it was that bad. However , when he later filed for headaches - to see if they were related to Desert Storm as an undiagnosed illness -- the C&P report said his headaches were caused by his cervicle condition at C 3-4 --the same place that he had CLAIMED earlier. So actually, since they now found a current disability at the same site he had claimed for -- they should have granted the previous Cervicle Strain claim.
3. Sinus Condition. Though he never claimed for a sinus condition -- his SMRS were full of treatment for chronic sinus condition. His claim for headaches also included that some of his headaches were caused by his cervicle strain - and some were caused by a sinus condition - that the C&P examiner indicated has been present in the service.
We were advised in this group to go ahead with the lung cancer claim first -- and then file for the other claims - posssibly on CUE.
SO when I file the DIC claim - should I just file for the lung cancer - and bring up the other claims later? Or should I file for them ALL at the same time (on the basis of accrued benefits for the other claims).
Or since he had no pending claims for the smaller ones (right shoulder, sinus, cervicle strain) are they gone forever?
Free
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
2
2
Popular Days
Feb 18
2
Feb 19
2
Top Posters For This Question
Berta 2 posts
free_spirit_etc 2 posts
Popular Days
Feb 18 2007
2 posts
Feb 19 2007
2 posts
3 answers to this question
Recommended Posts