Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Accrued Benefits

Rate this question


free_spirit_etc

Question

I am thinking that I should at least get my initial DIC claim in in the near future -- so I can start the process that will take some time.

My husband had a claim pending for lung cancer at the time of his death (from lung cancer)

But it says that the DIC application is also an application for accrued benefits.

So that will take into account his lung cancer claim. If it is awared - then I would get DIC and accrued for that.

However, there were also a couple of other claims that we were going to try to process:

1. His right shoulder -- which was claimed at retirement and denied because his SMRS did not show an incident that would have caused it. (Claim based on the fact that he was in the service for 28 years - they FOUND something wrong with his shoulder -- it most likely happened in the service --as he CLAIMED it PRIOR to retirement).

2. Cervicle Strain -- he also claimed this at retirement -- but theycouldnt find much wrong (it IS in the SMRS) -- but they something at C3-4 -- but didn't think it was that bad. However , when he later filed for headaches - to see if they were related to Desert Storm as an undiagnosed illness -- the C&P report said his headaches were caused by his cervicle condition at C 3-4 --the same place that he had CLAIMED earlier. So actually, since they now found a current disability at the same site he had claimed for -- they should have granted the previous Cervicle Strain claim.

3. Sinus Condition. Though he never claimed for a sinus condition -- his SMRS were full of treatment for chronic sinus condition. His claim for headaches also included that some of his headaches were caused by his cervicle strain - and some were caused by a sinus condition - that the C&P examiner indicated has been present in the service.

We were advised in this group to go ahead with the lung cancer claim first -- and then file for the other claims - posssibly on CUE.

SO when I file the DIC claim - should I just file for the lung cancer - and bring up the other claims later? Or should I file for them ALL at the same time (on the basis of accrued benefits for the other claims).

Or since he had no pending claims for the smaller ones (right shoulder, sinus, cervicle strain) are they gone forever?

Free

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Free -the DIC claim is dependent on the cause of death and how any SC disability contributed to that cause as listed on the death certificate.

The accrued claim-part of the 21-534- is for any benefits "based on evidence in the file at death." ( VBM page 545)

In Nov 2002 these regs were altered a little-

even if the evidence was not technically in the veteran's c file at death- still if the evidence was in VA possession at time of death- this evidence can be used for accrued benefits.

Accrued benefits due to the Bonny V Principi reg (I have claim filed on that reg)

state that the surviving spouse should be given ALL accrued benefits due the vet in their lifetime (less whatever comp the vet got)

They sent me 100% accrued less the 30% Rod got.

They failed to send accrued SMC on his Sec 1151 claim and I await decision under CUE on that.

I am not sure at all about filing these additional claims-and the DIC benefit is totally dependent on medical evidence that his SC contributed to his death.

"We were advised in this group to go ahead with the lung cancer claim first -- and then file for the other claims - posssibly on CUE."

A CUE can only be filed on a past denial- in which the appeal period lapsed-so a CUE could re-open those older claims-if they were denied containing legal errors. The legal errors would have to be stated. Duty to assist failures do not raise to level of legal error under CUE.

There is plenty of info here at hadit on CUE claims.

If they award DIC it goes back to date of his death.That service connects his death.

Then they must determine the accrued benefit-and service connect the lung cancer as it disabled him in his lifetime and then rate it.

DIC and accrued should be filed for within one year after death- CUES have no time limit. There is plenty for you to deal with already so maybe holding off on the CUEs is good idea.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"If they award DIC it goes back to date of his death.That service connects his death.

Then they must determine the accrued benefit-and service connect the lung cancer as it disabled him in his lifetime and then rate it.

DIC and accrued should be filed for within one year after death- CUES have no time limit. There is plenty for you to deal with already so maybe holding off on the CUEs is good idea."

So does that mean there is no advantage to filing this month except that it will get the process started sooner? i.e. The claim doesn't go back to the date filed? -- so as long as I get it in in the next couple months -- it will end up have the same effective date?

I apologize for my ignorance -- but I didn't check into the DIC very much -- spent most of my time checking the other stuff - and hoping I wouldn't have to apply for DIC.

Thanks

Free

Free -the DIC claim is dependent on the cause of death and how any SC disability contributed to that cause as listed on the death certificate.

The accrued claim-part of the 21-534- is for any benefits "based on evidence in the file at death." ( VBM page 545)

In Nov 2002 these regs were altered a little-

even if the evidence was not technically in the veteran's c file at death- still if the evidence was in VA possession at time of death- this evidence can be used for accrued benefits.

Accrued benefits due to the Bonny V Principi reg (I have claim filed on that reg)

state that the surviving spouse should be given ALL accrued benefits due the vet in their lifetime (less whatever comp the vet got)

They sent me 100% accrued less the 30% Rod got.

They failed to send accrued SMC on his Sec 1151 claim and I await decision under CUE on that.

I am not sure at all about filing these additional claims-and the DIC benefit is totally dependent on medical evidence that his SC contributed to his death.

"We were advised in this group to go ahead with the lung cancer claim first -- and then file for the other claims - posssibly on CUE."

A CUE can only be filed on a past denial- in which the appeal period lapsed-so a CUE could re-open those older claims-if they were denied containing legal errors. The legal errors would have to be stated. Duty to assist failures do not raise to level of legal error under CUE.

There is plenty of info here at hadit on CUE claims.

If they award DIC it goes back to date of his death.That service connects his death.

Then they must determine the accrued benefit-and service connect the lung cancer as it disabled him in his lifetime and then rate it.

DIC and accrued should be filed for within one year after death- CUES have no time limit. There is plenty for you to deal with already so maybe holding off on the CUEs is good idea.

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suggest that you fill out and file the entire 21-534 ASAP.

The application covers potential Death pension -if DIC is denied and your income is low and the vet was Wartime- (not served in war but wartime).

SOmetimes the Pension is granted until the DIC is awarded and then I guess they deduct the pension they paid from the DIC retro.

The application covers accrued also. I suggest and this is what I did-

under remarks # 48 tell them or refer them to attached statement spelling out that you are re-opening the veteran's last claim in support of the accrued claim.

On my app I re-opened two claims Rod had-

one generated DIC retro ,the other the accrued amount.

Also I suggest you download fill out and send form 21-530 rather then wait for VA to send this form-

I recently got a call from a widow who I had sent the entire 21-534 packet too with considerable info as to how her husband's death by suicide could possibly be service connected.I sent this stuff almost two years ago only to find she never even opened the envelope. I focused on this DIC claim for 2 or 3 whole days- I knew this vet very well and could offer eye witness testimony for her claim.

She never even sent in the form and now "needs money from the Army".

She lost the date of death as the earliest effective date for any potential DIC-

She lost any rights to accrued benefits.

She doesnt even have an EED because she doesnt even have a claim.

I sent her to a vet org.I cant help her anymore.

We had a widow here at hadit claiming an EED of decades before the date VA gave her for DIC-

She did not apply for DIC within one year after death. She applied many years after death. Her DIC date was retro to the date she filed the claim (the DIC claim)

It will take medical evidence that the condition that caused his death should be service connected.

Then VA will award DIC and somehow determine an accrued amount.

They accrued 100% in my accrued based on two years (there was an accrued limit of 2 years in those days) of probative medical evidence that showed the veteran was 100% P & T SC due to PTSD for 3 years prior to death but the VA stated in the award letter correctly -that the regs allowed only the 2 year award.

My DIC was awarded under Section 1151 -much different then yours -My present claim is for direct death due to service (AO)in rating board now-

I had to prove the Sec 1151 award and also the accrued award with medical evidence.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 3 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use