Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Va Compensation

Rate this question


Hoppy

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

I ran into a guy on this base where I hang around who had retired after twenty years in the Navy. The subject of my 100% SC had not come up and he was unaware of my situation. In a casual conversation I told him that I work online and help veterans with their disability claims. He made a comment that was somewhat disrespectful about people who seek disability from the VA. His comment was not the type you would hear from extremists with bizarre opinions about disabled persons that you will find with some research on google. However, he was pretty much of the opinion that people should go on with their life no matter what happens to them in the military without "leaning" on the gov't for money for disability.

A couple years ago I posted some limited discussions of how I justify the need for VA compensation to healthy and overly self-righteous individuals. If you have some spare time and are new to the board you might benefit from reading this post. Additionally, you may run into a person like guy I will talked about above. One other side of this is that there was a movement by some folks in Washington to change the VA system to only compensate veterans for injuries that occurred while they were actually performing their duty. I guess they thought that if you were injured in a skiing accident on the weekend the VA should not compensate you. I am pretty sure the folks trying to get this change were shot down. However, I am also sure they are still lurking in the shadows.

This was not the first time I have ran into someone with this opinion. I have found that these people have not had very much experience with people who are disabled and really do not understand how society deals with disability in general. So I take the time to "enlighten" them. What is funny is that by the time I am done they actually admit to me that they really were in the dark about the reasons for disability. Especially for people in the military.

I start by explaining that I have a life threatening disability my self that has interrupted my ability to function at numerous times in my life. As a result I have worked for only short periods of time for many different employers. I do well on civil service exams and have worked for city, county and federal govt. People who work for government agencies have disability benefits negotiated by a union. The retirement systems to which I belonged as a civil servant would pay an individual 50% of their salary for the rest of their life in the event they became disabled (at work or while skiing) and could not continue in the job for which they were hired. This is not to say any job. It means if a policeman can be a dog catcher he still gets his disability benefit from his job as a cop for the rest of his life. The only way he can lose his disability benefit is if his job as a dog catcher paid him as much as he made as a cop. His salary as a cop is guaranteed. Thus, if he made only 70% of his original cop salary as a dog catcher, he would get the 30% he was deficient from the retirement system he was a member of as a cop. Any employee in this system had this benefit including city plumbers and clerks. The only difference was that a cop was eligible on the first day of his employment and the plumber and clerk had to work at their job for five years.

Next, I explained that I worked for good corporate employers who took care of their employees. I worked for Standard Oil and a large printing company listed on the New York stock exchange. I explained that corporate employees also have long term disability benefits. The benefits get better the higher up in the corporate structure. As a closer I explain that I worked for Standard Oil when I was 19 years old. When I went into the military Standard Oil placed me on military leave. Had I continued to work at Standard Oil and not went into the military I would have had long term disability insurance. Should I lose this type of benefit during the time I am in the military just because I chose to do a tour of duty and the military did not offer a parallel benefit. When you consider that I took a huge salary loss because I made $600.00 a month while working for Standard Oil and the military paid me $88.00 a month, you would think that the gov't could afford to buy me about 10 long term disability plans. Since the gov't does not buy insurance and chooses to be self insured they can thrown in a benefit to any veteran called "compensation". And that is what I help veterans get from the government they chose to serve.

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 1
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

1 answer to this question

Recommended Posts

:)

Hoppy: "it don't mean nothin"

I am still going thru the paper work on my claim, Nam, 65-66, draftrd and did not know I entiteled to even go to the VA for help for my medical conditions. Vet frinds rold me to go and get checked out, this was in 02, have been going ever since, and the paperwork and getting the medical documents and filling out the stresors forms are making me think about what happened,

Welcome home

WAKO

I ran into a guy on this base where I hang around who had retired after twenty years in the Navy. The subject of my 100% SC had not come up and he was unaware of my situation. In a casual conversation I told him that I work online and help veterans with their disability claims. He made a comment that was somewhat disrespectful about people who seek disability from the VA. His comment was not the type you would hear from extremists with bizarre opinions about disabled persons that you will find with some research on google. However, he was pretty much of the opinion that people should go on with their life no matter what happens to them in the military without "leaning" on the gov't for money for disability.

A couple years ago I posted some limited discussions of how I justify the need for VA compensation to healthy and overly self-righteous individuals. If you have some spare time and are new to the board you might benefit from reading this post. Additionally, you may run into a person like guy I will talked about above. One other side of this is that there was a movement by some folks in Washington to change the VA system to only compensate veterans for injuries that occurred while they were actually performing their duty. I guess they thought that if you were injured in a skiing accident on the weekend the VA should not compensate you. I am pretty sure the folks trying to get this change were shot down. However, I am also sure they are still lurking in the shadows.

This was not the first time I have ran into someone with this opinion. I have found that these people have not had very much experience with people who are disabled and really do not understand how society deals with disability in general. So I take the time to "enlighten" them. What is funny is that by the time I am done they actually admit to me that they really were in the dark about the reasons for disability. Especially for people in the military.

I start by explaining that I have a life threatening disability my self that has interrupted my ability to function at numerous times in my life. As a result I have worked for only short periods of time for many different employers. I do well on civil service exams and have worked for city, county and federal govt. People who work for government agencies have disability benefits negotiated by a union. The retirement systems to which I belonged as a civil servant would pay an individual 50% of their salary for the rest of their life in the event they became disabled (at work or while skiing) and could not continue in the job for which they were hired. This is not to say any job. It means if a policeman can be a dog catcher he still gets his disability benefit from his job as a cop for the rest of his life. The only way he can lose his disability benefit is if his job as a dog catcher paid him as much as he made as a cop. His salary as a cop is guaranteed. Thus, if he made only 70% of his original cop salary as a dog catcher, he would get the 30% he was deficient from the retirement system he was a member of as a cop. Any employee in this system had this benefit including city plumbers and clerks. The only difference was that a cop was eligible on the first day of his employment and the plumber and clerk had to work at their job for five years.

Next, I explained that I worked for good corporate employers who took care of their employees. I worked for Standard Oil and a large printing company listed on the New York stock exchange. I explained that corporate employees also have long term disability benefits. The benefits get better the higher up in the corporate structure. As a closer I explain that I worked for Standard Oil when I was 19 years old. When I went into the military Standard Oil placed me on military leave. Had I continued to work at Standard Oil and not went into the military I would have had long term disability insurance. Should I lose this type of benefit during the time I am in the military just because I chose to do a tour of duty and the military did not offer a parallel benefit. When you consider that I took a huge salary loss because I made $600.00 a month while working for Standard Oil and the military paid me $88.00 a month, you would think that the gov't could afford to buy me about 10 long term disability plans. Since the gov't does not buy insurance and chooses to be self insured they can thrown in a benefit to any veteran called "compensation". And that is what I help veterans get from the government they chose to serve.

ARMY MEDIC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 3 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use