Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Higher level aid and attendance

Rate this question


Lonniebrinson

Question

I recently filed for aid and attendance. I was denied because the va said I do not meet the criteria for higher level of aid and attendance which will be (SMC-R2). Here's the problem I filed for basic  aid and attendance under 38 cfr 3.352(a) ( SMC-L). Do anyone have any idea why the va overlooked the basic level of aid and attendance ?

My current rating is SMC-P2. 

SMC-L loss of use of both feet

100% bowel incontinence

60% urine incontinence

60% IVDS

50% PTSD

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 1

I would make sure I appeal it.

I look at it like this they are not try to grant the smc l for aid attendance.

Because this would give u two smc l and would trigger the smc o.

Which I believe if you receive in home care by a company. Would granted the smc r.

On appeal I would state I am not look for smc r.

I am looking for smc l for the need of help of others.

Not sure if you had the aid and attendance comp exam. If you did I would include it.

A statement from wife kids about how they help u.

And explain that in the appeal.

 

The board and va seem like they don't like address smc claims once they get in the smc o r area.

I am fighting the same thing almost I was granted smc l for help of other.

The board state this is for all my condition.

This is done so I can't claim need of help for different condition that are different body parts.

In my case they will not even address the smc o or r after the us court of veterans appeal remand it to be address.

I receive in home care provide by a company.

 

Good luck and don't give up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
44 minutes ago, Mr cue said:

I would make sure I appeal it.

I look at it like this they are not try to grant the smc l for aid attendance.

Because this would give u two smc l and would trigger the smc o.

Which I believe if you receive in home care by a company. Would granted the smc r.

On appeal I would state I am not look for smc r.

I am looking for smc l for the need of help of others.

Not sure if you had the aid and attendance comp exam. If you did I would include it.

A statement from wife kids about how they help u.

And explain that in the appeal.

 

The board and va seem like they don't like address smc claims once they get in the smc o r area.

I am fighting the same thing almost I was granted smc l for help of other.

The board state this is for all my condition.

This is done so I can't claim need of help for different condition that are different body parts.

In my case they will not even address the smc o or r after the us court of veterans appeal remand it to be address.

I receive in home care provide by a company.

 

Good luck and don't give up.

Thanks for responding. You're right they don't like awarding higher levels of SMC. I use a Condon catheter maybe it confused the rater they I need a license medical personnel to insert it. Thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
1 hour ago, Mr cue said:

I bet there is nothing about the license personal or the catheter. In the decision

They are to address all evidence favorable and unfavorable.

This how benefit of doubt works.

 

 

 

Lol you're right again... Your opinion how should I appeal this matter supplemental explaining it on a 4138, HLR with a phone call or take it to BVA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Do not appeal yet. Get any document you can find on the internet that can be considered new evidence and submit a supplemental claim. Medical studies on the internet that show the severity of the condition, a statement from a care taker, and copies of VA M21r/USC/CFR are all things that may be considered new evidence. Get one of each supporting your claim and that documents the errors in the original decision, and then write a lay statement describing in detail what you consider to be errors in the denial. Include that with a supplemental claim and let them take the 90-120 days to process it. Just say the failed to comply with the M21/CFR/USC.

If there is a clear and unmistakable error (CUE), do not state so in this round, but instead detail the error step by step referencing M21/CFR/USC so that there is no question about what you state is true. CUE can only be claimed once, so instead of doing it up front, leave it for appeals.

If they deny it after that, think about a VSO that can communicate w/the RO directly. If that does not get it done, then appeal. Appeals are a lot longer than new evidence submissions and with the new appeals set up, you have up to a year to file supplemental and HR claims without losing your original claim award date. You can literally string out a claim for 5 years and get the back pay as long as you meet the new evidence requirement.

 

This is the guidebook that the VA MUST follow when they process claims.

Edited by pwrslm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
8 hours ago, pwrslm said:

Do not appeal yet. Get any document you can find on the internet that can be considered new evidence and submit a supplemental claim. Medical studies on the internet that show the severity of the condition, a statement from a care taker, and copies of VA M21r/USC/CFR are all things that may be considered new evidence. Get one of each supporting your claim and that documents the errors in the original decision, and then write a lay statement describing in detail what you consider to be errors in the denial. Include that with a supplemental claim and let them take the 90-120 days to process it. Just say the failed to comply with the M21/CFR/USC.

If there is a clear and unmistakable error (CUE), do not state so in this round, but instead detail the error step by step referencing M21/CFR/USC so that there is no question about what you state is true. CUE can only be claimed once, so instead of doing it up front, leave it for appeals.

If they deny it after that, think about a VSO that can communicate w/the RO directly. If that does not get it done, then appeal. Appeals are a lot longer than new evidence submissions and with the new appeals set up, you have up to a year to file supplemental and HR claims without losing your original claim award date. You can literally string out a claim for 5 years and get the back pay as long as you meet the new evidence requirement.

 

This is the guidebook that the VA MUST follow when they process claims.

Wow thanks for the ammo I will do exactly that. I can't believe the va rater overlooked my 100% Bowel incontinence. The M21-1 states a single 100% disability should be considered an Inferred claim and consider it for smc- L aid and attendance.. Thank you so much

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use