Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Did I Do The Right Thing?

Rate this question


Cammy

Question

I have a relative that is a WWII Vet that never filed for disability. He now is diagnosed with asbestosis. Having read here that so many of you have taken control of your own cases, I helped him fill out the VA claim form, get his DD 214, and documentation from his primary care provider (civilian). We sent his claim package and recieved a letter from the VA saying that they have recieved his claim and will process it.

In talking to the local AMVET rep he tells me that I screwed up. According to the AMVET rep "...the VA will eat him up because he does not have representation". The rep told me that no service organization will take his case and represent him to the VA after the claim is filed. So basically this guy is taking on the VA by himself.

So did I screw up? Is it ok to have filed the claim (this vet could die tomorrow) without a VSO? Is the local VSO just blowing smoke? This VSO has my power of attorney and has filed paperwork for me in the past. Having said that, I sometimes have a better idea what is going on than this guy so my confidence level with this guy is not sky high. To be brutally honest I get the impression that he is paid on commision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 20
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

To be honest, I think that a veteran who is able to use a computer, the internet, and research the claims and appeals process is better off filing their own claim. Now thats not the majority of people, but I'd be comfortable saying that about most people on here. Just the fact that you found Hadit is evidence that you are researching claims and appeals processes.

The VSO, well in your case I'm of the OPINION - that he probably was blowing smoke as far as representation.... you'll probably do just as well without him if you work to make sure you study the claims.

rdawg - I have a grudge against AmVets, and their reps... so I wont comment other than to say I found them of little to no use.

Thanks for the comment!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cammy,

I would not recommend ever speaking to the AMVETS representative again as he/she clearly hasn't a clue what they are talking about. Find yourself a competent representative or go it on your own. Either way, I'd revoke their POA just to eliminate the chance that they might screw something up for you in the future.

As far as the asbestosis claim, what did the veteran do in service to expose them to asbestos and what branch of service was he/she in?

Navy veterans who served in certain military occupation specialties can be recognized as having either "probable" or "highly probable" asbestos exposure in service. Examples would include, but are not limited to: Machinist Mates, Boiler Techs, Pipe Fitters, etc.

Other branches could potentially be exposed too based on their duties...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Other guy, Navy 1945-1948 and again 1950-1952. Served aboard ARD's (Auxillary Repair Dock). Held ratings as a metal smith and shipfitter. Both jobs were basically the same, maintain heating, air conditioning and ventalation systems as well as boiler type work. He can remember having to take apart ductwork and repair or replace asbestos insulation. The ARD's were basically a floating dry dock similar in design to the ship that brought the USS Cole back to the U.S..

He was awarded some cash in one of the asbestos law suits a few years ago but alas he foolishly squandered it on food and rent.

Here is the statement I put with his package. Comments welcome

I served in the United States Navy between 1945and 1948 and again from 1950 to 1952. I was trained as a ship fitter in 1945 and assigned to the USS Thompson DMS 38. As a ship fitter it was my responsibility to maintain the structural hull and mechanical systems on the ship. The mechanical systems included the boiler as well as the heating and ventilation systems.

It is well documented that the Naval ships of this era utilized asbestos as hull insulation and insulation for steam and ventilation pipes. My work required that I perform my duties in close proximity to asbestos covered hulls and pipes. When a system malfunction occurred, the asbestos insulation would have to be removed in order to affect repairs. It is during the period of 1945 through 1948 that my first exposure to asbestos occurred.

In 1950 I was called back to active duty during the Korean Conflict. During this period of active service I was assigned to the USS ARD (Auxiliary Repair Dock) -20 and the USS ARD-31 as a ship-fitter/metal smith until 1952. These ships were floating dry dock vessels tasked with completing repairs to ships in the theater of operations including battle damage and major hull damage repairs. During this period of service I was trained as a sheet metal worker and was assigned to repair and maintain the heating and cooling systems. This assignment required that I fabricate, repair and or replace damaged duct work which again was insulated with asbestos material.

When I left active military service I did not apply for VA disability benefits and until recently was unaware that I was eligible to apply for disability benefits. I have received heath related care from a VA medical facility and I am currently registered in the VA health care system. I have been diagnosed and I am currently being treated for asbestosis by my civilian health care provider. I have been told by my doctor that I have only 1/3 of normal lung capacity and have been prescribed oxygen which I use daily. Based on the nature of my active duty job assignments and periods of service it is my belief that my asbestosis is a result of exposure to asbestos during active military service.

I requested a copy of my service medical records from the National Archives in St Louis some time ago but have not received correspondence regarding those records. Your assistance in processing my claim for disability benefits is greatly appreciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he is terminal, see if you can secure a statement from his doctor reflecting this fact. If you are able to accomplish this, have the veteran file a request for "terminal expedite" and ask the VA to schedule him with an examination ASAP.

Based on the information you provided, it would seem highly likely that the service department would provide a "highly probable" exposure history for asbestos in service. This in combination with the fact that he has asbestosis will probably be a slam dunk for a grant of benefits. The pulmonary function test results completed at his C&P examination would most likely determine the percentage of disability that is assigned. The only way to potentially bipass this testing is if the veteran is on outpatient oxygen therapy or has cor pulmonale or has pulmonary hypertension as these symptoms would warrant a 100% evaluation.

The VA will likely request an opinion to determine whether the exposure to asbestos in service was the likely cause of this disability...but based on what you have provided I don't think that you should have any trouble getting the benefits for this veteran.

Edited by theotherguy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If i were you I would walk his claim over to DAV Disabled American Veterans or someone who is in the large scope of things a big lobbist, and handles a lot of claims. I am sure with all the wealth of knowledge they can help you fix this solution. I never cared for Amvets. NSO's by the way can not get paid by commission. However, with the new law (in which people are appealing----Attorney's can). I sent a fellow Marine down to the DAV for his deceased uncle. VA hospital said he never came to the VA. However, with a few high level calls, and paperwork, that Marine had the information to give to the funeral parlor before he left. Sometimes it helps.

-Spike-

Vet Advocate

--------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he is terminal, see if you can secure a statement from his doctor reflecting this fact. If you are able to accomplish this, have the veteran file a request for "terminal expedite" and ask the VA to schedule him with an examination ASAP.

Is there a form for this or do I just call?

Based on the information you provided, it would seem highly likely that the service department would provide a "highly probable" exposure history for asbestos in service. This in combination with the fact that he has asbestosis will probably be a slam dunk for a grant of benefits. The pulmonary function test results completed at his C&P examination would most likely determine the percentage of disability that is assigned. The only way to potentially bipass this testing is if the veteran is on outpatient oxygen therapy or has cor pulmonale or has pulmonary hypertension as these symptoms would warrant a 100% evaluation.

The vet is on oxygen therapy

The VA will likely request an opinion to determine whether the exposure to asbestos in service was the likely cause of this disability...but based on what you have provided I don't think that you should have any trouble getting the benefits for this veteran.

OUTSTANDING!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use