Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

TBI claim for SMC-T

Rate this question


scarf

Question

I am 100% P&T for PTSD and I just currently filled a new claim for residuals of TBI for SMC-T. I worked under 100% P&T; however, I stopped working due to dealing with the residuals of my TBI. VA just updated my claim for me to complete a TDIU form. Will this jeopardize my P&T status already for PTSD?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
3 minutes ago, scarf said:

@Mr cue The reason why I think they want me to complete a TDIU form is because in my personal statement,

Yes I thought you might have stated that but that statement was evidence for the TBI and smc t.

It was not been used to apply for tdiu.

My opinion the VA will open all disability up and order exams for all. If you apply for tdiu.

There is not purpose to apply for tdiu.

But you have gotten great info you have a choice to make how you proceed.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

Typically, when a veteran files for TDIU, they must list the disability or disabilities that makes them unemployable. If the veteran list all his/her disabilities, then the VA would review all their ratings but if the veteran only lists a disability or a few disabilities those are the ratings that the VA would review. 

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

@Mr cue This is what it says verbatim:

Request 1

 Needed from you - due in a month

You may be entitled to compensation at the 100 percent rate if you are unable to secure and follow a substantially gainful occupation because of your service-connected disabilities. If you believe you qualify, complete, sign, and return the enclosed VA Form 21-8940, Veterans Application for Increased Compensation Based on Unemployability

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
1 hour ago, scarf said:

did not file any  VA Form 21-8940. Read my original post.

Ok is everyone missing that the Veteran stated he didn't apply for tdiu.

The VA is telling a 100% pt veteran to apply for tdiu.

Yes if a veteran isn't 100% the VA is to look at tdiu. Not open tdiu claims for pt veterans.

Now if no one see a problem with this I don't understand.

Now I am proactive when it comes to the VA and not from the school the VA is trying to help the veteran not these days.

We all understand the new Comp exam stuff been pull an used by the VA. Well some of us.

I wouldn't allowing it. It is no help to getting smc t or TBI. What the Veteran apply for.

If they don't fix it or work it out quick

I am take this is a new claim?

. I would withdraw the whole claim and start over. You lose nothing but a few months.

I wouldn't want to fight that fight. 

That how I stop all the va games. Withdrawal are part of the VA rules an process an legal.

before I get ban for stating my opinion 

I would just reapply  an let them do there job.

Either way you're in for a fight I just wouldn't put my rating in the fight.

No need to.

 

It's call been proactive.

This is my opinion 

Disclaimer I am not a veteran agent an am not acting as one.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

You posted:

Quote

The reason why I think they want me to complete a TDIU form is because in my personal statement, I said I became unemployed due to the residuals of my TBI and I am currently unable to return back to work. So I think it automatically triggered the TDIU application for my claim.

Correct.  Berry law explains it this way:

VA Disability Rating Reasonably Raised by the Record

Posted by Berry Law on April 26, 2017 in Veterans Disability

Did you know the VA is not only required to adjudicate the disability compensation claims a veteran expressly raised – such as a claim for hearing loss – but is also required to adjudicate any claims reasonably raised by the record? For example, if the VA discovers through a hearing examination that the veteran is also suffering from ringing in the ears (tinnitus), VA should treat tinnitus as a claim and properly adjudicate it.

The law requires the VA to “give a sympathetic reading to the veteran’s filings by ‘determining all potential claims raised by the evidence, applying all relevant laws and regulations.’” Szemraj v. Principi, 357 F.3d 1370, 1373 (Fed. Cir.2004) (quoting Roberson v. Principi, 251 F.3d 1378, 1384 (Fed. Cir. 2001) (emphasis added)). Moreover, “the Board is required to adjudicate all issues reasonably raised by a liberal reading of the appellant’s substantive appeal, including all documents and oral testimony in the record prior to the Board’s decision.” Brannon v. West, 12 Vet. App. 32, 34 (1998); see also Solomon v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 396 (1994).

Source: 

https://ptsdlawyers.com/reasonably-raised-by-the-record/#:~:text=To raise an informal claim,Robinson v.

 

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use