Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Foot drop issue and peripheral neuropathy claim

Rate this question


Signcavah

Question

When I was granted my prostate cancer claim there was a recommendation to refile for peripheral neuropathy.  I refiled a 526 ez as specified. I listed all of my denials for my foot ankle and leg issues.  ( I broke both feet in service, 10% for metatarsalgia) I have PN from the hip down in both legs and feet as well as my right arm.  I am in AFO`s on both legs. 

I forgot to apply for foot drop, right leg.  My question is should I file for this as well?  Or will this be considered as well ?  The VA diagnosed and has been treating the foot drop , I`m currently in PT for 10 weeks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Yes, file on the foot drop. I would seek a medical opinion from a podiatrist, or your primary care. Permanent loss of the common perenial nerve causes foot drop. The AFOs are prescribed for the foot drop condition. At the very least ask your PCP or Podiatrist to enter into your medical record that you have permanent loss of your common perenial nerves.

The following is an exerpt from 38 CFR 3.350. Google it, copy it, highlight the underlined portion at (b) and send it in with your loss of use of feet claim. 

(2) Foot and hand.

(i) Loss of use of a hand or a foot will be held to exist when no effective function remains other than that which would be equally well served by an amputation stump at the site of election below elbow or knee with use of a suitable prosthetic appliance. The determination will be made on the basis of the actual remaining function, whether the acts of grasping, manipulation, etc., in the case of the hand, or of balance, propulsion, etc., in the case of the foot, could be accomplished equally well by an amputation stump with prosthesis; for example:

(a) Extremely unfavorable complete ankylosis of the knee, or complete ankylosis of two major joints of an extremity, or shortening of the lower extremity of 3 1/2 inches or more, will constitute loss of use of the hand or foot involved.

(b) Complete paralysis of the external popliteal nerve (common peroneal) and consequent footdrop, accompanied by characteristic organic changes including trophic and circulatory disturbances and other concomitants confirmatory of complete paralysis of this nerve, will be taken as loss of use of the foot.

Loss of use of two feet is an SMC "L" award in itself. There will also be a vehicle grant and a path to the $110,000.00  SAH grant.

Go over to the SMC R-1 and R-2 forum thread here at hadit. Read and comprehend what is being discussed there. Learn from it. Pay extra special attention to the pyramiding rules, and then file for A&A due soley to the prostate cancer issues.

Proceed cautiously with that A&A claim as there are pitfalls along the way that can cost you a lot of money. If you work it right and do not violate the pyramiding rules you could very well end up with a R-1 rating.

The 2023 R-1 pay rate for the veteran alone is $9,036.89 per month. Pay for R-1 for veteran with spouse is $9,238.83.

You got questions, just ask!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Well that was quick, I got a letter telling me that I used the wrong form and must resubmit on the right form  My decision letter for prostate cancer   told me to submit  for PN on the 526 EZ which I did. I swear the inmates are running the asylum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

Classic.  You fill out a 526 EZ, and its rejected because its on the wrong form.  So, you are told to fill out a 526EZ form.  

This is just like the "blonde" policewoman and "blonde" driver in a traffic stop:

Police:  "may I see your drivers license and registration, please"

Driver:  "What's a driver's license".  

Police (sympathetically):  Look for something in your purse with your picture on it.  

(Driver finds a mirror and hands it to police:

Police:  After looking at the mirror, the police responds, "You should have told me you were a police officer, you may go". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use