Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Just Received This Letter Of Medical Opinion

Rate this question


jessie0054

Question

Hello All:

I had ask my son's Onc/Hem Dr to write a letter of Medical Opinion months and months ago as to his Opinion that my son's Apendix Cancer and his Polycythemia Vera had anything to do with his Military Exposure to Benzene in the Jet Fuels he used as an Aviation Structual Mechanic in the Navy.

I received his letter on Saturday April 14th, 2007.

In short this is what he had to say:

" I do feel that it is a possibility that both of his conditions could be caused by the exposure to Jet Fuels containing Benzene and other organic Solvents while he was working around the Helicoptors and breathing the fumes and exhause during the refueling duties while serving as a Aviation Structural Mechanic in the Navy.

The prognosis of the Apediceal Cancer is Permament even though the patient is showing signs of complete remission in the fulture there could be changes to this status and diease status. The Polycythemia Vera will also be permanent and will need monitored for the rest of Mr: B----- Life by routine lab work and possible need for routine phlebotomies.

Signed and Dated by DR

Do you think this letter will hold any value since they have already made a decision on and denied him on the Cancer and gave a 0% service connection on the Polycythemia Vera.

Should i send it to the VA or just forget it??

Thanks,

Jessie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Jessie,

About a year ago somebody posted a document showing the types of cancers that were found in association with both non-combusted JP-4 and combusted JP-4. Do you have this as a reference or anything like it. If not, we should try to find it. From what the doctor said it sounds like the chemicals in JP-4 are considered carcenogens. It would be stronger to show a relationship between a specific type of cancer and a specific chemical.

Hello Hoppy:

No I do not have this reference. But i will look for it. Although it might be hard to show a relationship between the Jet Fuel and the type of cancer my son has as it is such a very rare cancer. The closest i came was in some testing done and i believe i found that in the EPA site somewhere i thought i had bookmarked it to go back a print later when i got more printer paper as the report was about 300 pages, But the words RARE CANCERS were in this report. I now cannot find it anywhere!!

Jessie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jessie,

You could always call the doc and ask him if he would be willing the change " I do feel that it is a possibility" to "it is more likely than not". There's no down side to asking and the upside is he may be willing to change it to a stronger statement that the VA would have a harder time dismissing.

If you can find more research like what Hoppy's posting about on the correlation between your son's illness and the jet fuel, wait to ask the doc to change his statement until after you have the research in hand and can show it to him and then ask him if, in light of the evidence you've given him, if he would be willing to change is "possiblity" statement to a "more likely than not statement."

Good luck and keep us posted.

ts

Thanks TS.

I did call the DR on Monday, I'm waiting for a call back from him. I'm pretty sure he will change it wording i might have to write him again and give him the format to follow for the VA.

But i can do that .

Again thanks

Jessie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use