Jump to content


  • hate-ads-subscribe-now.jpg

  • Ad
  • Ad
  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims


    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • Ad
  • 0
Sign in to follow this  

Boots On Ground


I have recently filed a claim for exposure to herbicdes while assigned TDY at Korat AFB 72-73. I was a jet engine mechanic and supplied as much supporting documentation that I had. I filed over 2 months ago, talked to the 800 number twice but have not recieved any verification that they have reviewed my claim - I do have a certified delivery receipt showing it was signed for at the mailroom's VARO on Oct 23, 2012.

Yesterday I finally got a reply from NPRC regarding my requests for pay/travel records for my 2 TDY tours to Korat AFB. To my suprise one of my stops was at Ton Son Nhut AFB RVN, it states that I arrived at 1400 and departed 1450. I think if I refile I should use the Boots On Ground approach as opposed to Direct Connection.

Question: Being that my flight shows I was only on the ground for 50 mins, will the VBA decision makers claim that is not considered Boots On Ground?

Should I refile using both Direct Connect and Boots On Ground?

I have had CABG surgery and dx of IHD.

Edited by x020574

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

If you can prove you had "boots on the ground" then file for "boots on the ground" and Direct Connect. I think you are very lucky you have that documentation showing you were at TSN.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


It was a surprise to me... since my documentation only states that I served in Thailand and didn't specify which location. Hoping to avoid any contentions, I wrote to NPRC and provided the dates of TDY and requested any Pay or Travel records hoping to prove I was at Korat AFB. Little did I know I did stop in RVN - hey, it was 40 years ago, I'm lucky i can remember my wife's name today!

I'm worried they will argue that it was only 50 minutes - am I worring for nothing? I have heard 'if you only touch your big toe on the ground and jump back on the plane, you are considered boots on the ground' - is that really true?

Thank you for the quick response!

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can send the VA "supplementary information". Since you originally filed in October 2012, I doubt that your claim has even been looked at.

The presumptive classification applies. Unfortunately, due to the filing date, you will not come under the Nehmer rules.

You do have "feet on ground" status, based upon what you said concerning your pay records, etc.

You're very fortunate. Most are unable to provide such detail. For example, my records show "boots on ground" because of medical records from an in Vietnam medical facility. Although I flew from Vietnam to Japan under orders, that does not show up in my records. I'd bet that a handful of Marines (If they are still around) that were on gate guard duty at Yokosuka one evening still remember us for climbing out of a cab in "field uniforms", under arms, etc. There was a bit of a hassle, until we told the guards that the orders called for "under arms" and no delay. Further, that our weapons were loaded, and theirs were not. As we left the guard OOD's office, he started in on the guards.

Something about don't mess with armed service men coming back from Vietnam, and fools with unloaded weapons. The hassle started because we were technically "out of authorized uniform" for Japan, as well as carrying weapons in "public transport". This came about because we had flown to Japan on a guard C-141, which landed after military transportation was available. "Customs" was at another location, so we were "signed off" as crew by the aircraft commander.

My records also show "combat veteran" status, which the VA has so far ignored.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have considerable info here at hadit on Thailand vets.

This contains the most recent VA Bulletin on the dates and places VA has conceded AO exposure in, depending on MOS:

"Being that my flight shows I was only on the ground for 50 mins, will the VBA decision makers claim that is not considered Boots On Ground?"

They better not. In a 50 minutes stop over,it is quite possible you could have left the plane to stretch your legs,have a smoke, or relieve yourself as it was probably a refueling pit stop.

VA tried to CUE themselves to drop compensation they had already awarded to a Brown Water Vietnam vet many years ago, who joined hadit, around the time I joined.....due to no boots on ground.

I helped him prove one foot on Vietnamese soil.

(He really only had one foot (one boot) on Vietnamese soil,not two- and only for a minute or two.)

VA dropped their reduction idea.

The proof of the RVN stopover might help you more than the Thailand regs. I would send them anything you have on both potential reasons to SC you.

Since those days ,with the Brown Water vet I mentioned, many Brown Waters and some Blue Waters have succeeded in their AO claims. And Many Thailand AO vets have too.

I got some AO ship's list info yesterday and will put it into the AO forum today.

Edited by Berta

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

It wouldn't surprise me if they asked for actual proof of you getting off the airplane, ie: boots on the ground, in which case you may need to show some kind of protocol that passengers needed to exit the aircraft during ground refueling. just sayin . . . I guess it'll depend on the rater's mood that day. Sad but true.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

They might but that could be challenged.

For example

A Blue Water Navy advocate I know is the widow of a Vietnam Navy AO veteran.I met her when I joined BWNVVA on line years ago and she told me her story.

She proved her husband had been on COD flights (Cargo delivery) from his ship to Vietnam,then he returned to the carrier.

Whether or not he had actually left the COD plane during these deliveries or pick ups was not the issue as the BVA stated:

“in light of statements from others who served in and

around Vietnam, including pilots who flew COD flights-which,

when taken together, tended to show that servicemen

ordinarily arrived on mid-cruise carriers via COD flights and

that, due to fuel/range limitations and other considerations,

COD flights from Cubi Point ordinarily stopped in Vietnam

before continuing on to the destination carrier-the Board

found that the evidence demonstrated to a reasonable

likelihood that the Veteran had actual duty or visitation in


Proof of “Visitation” itself , is often just as good as 'boots on the ground.'

Unfortunately this widow had a very long and miserable ordeal to get her DIC.Se didnt know of us at hadit at the time.

She had to get buddy statements and lots of other information. I think she had a BVA hearing as well -but we widows can be quite tenacious in gathering evidence.!

She is now an integral part of the Blue Water Navy Vietnam Veterans Association along with John Rossie and all who are fighting for Blue Water Veterans equity regarding AO.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Our picks

    • e-Benefits Status Messages 

      Claims Process – Your claim can go from any step to back a step depending on the specifics of the claim, so you may go from Pending Decision Approval back to Review of Evidence. Ebenefits status is helpful but not definitive. Continue Reading
      • 0 replies
    • I was rated at 10% for tinnitus last year by the VA. I went to my private doctor yesterday and I described to him the problems that I have been having with my sense of balance. Any sudden movement of my head or movement while sitting in my desk chair causes me to lose my balance and become nauseous. Also when seeing TV if there are certain scenes,such as movement across or up and down the screen my balance is affected. The doctor said that what is causing the problem is Meniere's Disease. Does any know if this could be secondary to tinnitus and if it would be rated separately from the tinnitus? If I am already rated at 10% for tinnitus and I could filed for Meniere's does any one know what it might be rated at? Thanks for your help. 68mustang
      • 15 replies
    • Feb 2018 on HadIt.com Veteran to Veteran. Sharing top posts and a few statistics with you.
      • 0 replies
    • I have a 30% hearing loss and 10% Tinnitus rating since 5/17.  I have Meniere's Syndrome which was diagnosed by a VA facility in 2010 yet I never thought to include this in my quest for a rating.  Meniere's is very debilitating for me, but I have not made any noise about it because I could lose my license to drive.  I am thinking of applying for additional compensation as I am unable to work at any meaningful employment as I cannot communicate effectively because of my hearing and comprehension difficulties.  I don't know whether to file for a TDUI, or just ask for additional compensation.  My county Veterans service contact who helped me get my current rating has been totally useless on this when I asked her for help.  Does anyone know which forms I should use?  There are so many different directions to proceed on this that I am confused.  Any help would be appreciated.  Vietnam Vet 64-67. 
    • If you are new to hadit and have DIC questions it would help us tremendously if you can answer the following questions right away in your first post.

      What was the Primary Cause of Death (# 1) as listed on your spouse’s death certificate?

      What,if anything, was listed as a contributing cause under # 2?

      Was an autopsy done and if so do you have a complete copy of it?

       It can be obtained through the Medical Examiner’s office in your locale.

      What was the deceased veteran service connected for in his/her lifetime?

      Did they have a claim pending at death and if so what for?

      If they died from anything on the Agent Orange Presumptive list ( available here under a search) when did they serve and where? If outside of Vietnam, what was their MOS and also if they served onboard a ship in the South Pacific what ship were they on and when? Also did they have any major  physical  contact with C 123s during the Vietnam War?

      And how soon after their death was the DIC form filed…if filed within one year of death, the date of death will be the EED for DIC and also satisfy the accrued regulation criteria.
      • 14 replies