Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

What Specifically Is A Service Record

Rate this question


free_spirit_etc

Question

Where the rules say that any service records that are not in the claim file are later discovered / submitted -- they will be considered to have been IN the claim file at the date of the decision.

So I am basically getting that if the VA was supposed to get records from the military and did not get them - if they get them later -- and you are filing a CUE, or accrued benefits claim -- where it is important to establish that those records WERE in the claim file previously -- the decision must be made AS IF they WERE in the claim file on that date, even if they were not.

Now I know the VA tends to act like SMR are the ONLY records that matter. But if the rule is Service Records - would this also apply to OTHER records on the veteran (military records) and other records obtained from the military (like asbestos reports, programs in place, etc.)If the VA had been put on notice that such records exist -- if such records are NOT in the claim file - but later added - can they be considered a Service Record which is presumed to have been IN the claim file at an earlier date?

Free

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Service records do extend beyond just service medical records. They basically are any records maintained by the service department (Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, Coast Guard, etc.) and could also be what are most also referred to as service personnel records. These could be deployment or TDY orders (such as the case with a veteran going to Vietnam) or CID investigation reports (such as when a rape or sexual assault takes place in service) or even award orders showing the veteran received a Combat Action Ribbon (potentially pertinent in establishing service connection for PTSD or other disabilities attributable to combat).

These would not represent a CUE though since they were not of record in the claims folder at the time a decision was made. So in these cases the regulations allow for them to take corrective action based on the receipt or obtaining service records later on down the road.

Edited by theotherguy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Yeah, what that other guy just said. ;)

"It is cold and we have no blankets.

The little children are freezing to death.

My people, some of them, have run away to the hills, and have no blankets, no food; no one knows where they are-perhaps freezing to death.

I want to have time to look for my children and see how many of them I can find.

Maybe I shall find them among the dead.

Hear me, my chiefs! I am tired; my heart is sick and sad.

From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever."

Chief Joseph

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A further example is when I was filing my own claim in 2002, I filed for IVDS. It was denied because I had not proven that I was incapacitated for enough time.... I realized that all my convalescent leave records were in my 201 file, and just barely mentioned in my medical record. I pulled and copied them, resubmitted as a NOD with new and material evidence and got the IVDS rating I was looking for.

Further, performance evaluation, Article 15's, Captains Mast records can all be helpful in certain claims if you are trying to prove a PATTERN of miscondunduct associated with say PTSD, or some other mental disorder....

So, ALL military records are submittable as evidence. They can and do often make a great deal of difference....

Edited by sixthscents

Bob Smith

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bob--- GREAT advice-

The disciplinary action reports were the main thing that proved nexus for a vet friend of mine. (In service mental illness)

Also Personnel records can help support an inservice injury if the Duty was changed to light duty etc- due to the accident or injury.

I know a few former Corpmen-

even under combat scenarios they tried to document everything-

There is nothing better than having the actual SMRs-

I never depend on what VA says is in them or not in them.

Old SMRs- you might have to scan and keep blowing them up- even read them in a mirror- etc-and ask for others to see what they seem to say-

but it is well worth the time it takes to pour over them good.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use