Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

And / Or

Rate this question


free_spirit_etc

Question

This isn't really an issue with the VA -- at least not at this time - but could be for others..

What is your interpretation of the use of and/or.

If someone says you must do this and / or that...

Are thay saying either or both?

My concern is I don't want to do this.

But if I do that --they will focus on the AND (i.e. we said both)

But if I object to them trying to do this --they will focus on the OR (i.e. we said this OR that..we didn't try to MAKE you do this..)

Free

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

And/or can mean "in addition to" or "in the place of". So, baseball, basketball and/or football would mean any combination of those 3 or any single one alone. It's supposed to be a flexible phrase, but I can see your point how the VA could abuse it (I've seen it done with PTSD).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's like writting a check if you put Mr. AND Mrs. Both must sign if you

Put Mr. OR Mrs. either one can sign. So I would say if they write down OR than it would be either one if they write down AND they would mean both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am sorry I should have add this in my last post. It is also a legal term when writting anything legal like a Will, Insurance ext. AND means all parties OR means either parties. The best way to understand And / Or is my example of your checking account or savings account And means BOTH Or means Either one must sign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks! I have been doing some battling with an insurance company over a statement they want me to sign.

The most current letter said "if we don't receive a signed and dated statement" and / or hear from you in the next 30 days, we will close the claim.'

The authorization they want me to sing actually STATES "“ I understand that I may refuse to sign this authorization and that XXXX does not condition payment of a claim for benefits on whether or not I sign this authorization.â€

But I get the feeling they are putting me in a catch - 22 -- If I raise heck that they are trying to force me to sign a statement that SAYS I am not required to sign it - they can come back with "We said OR hear from you - we didn't try to MAKE you sign it." But if I don't sign it and they hear from me - they can say "WE said AND sign the statement."

Free

Edited by free_spirit_etc
Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Free,

Insurance companies are good for phrass like that. They need you to contact them within the the timeframe they stated, (but really do want you to sign the paper, but can't force you so the have to give you the option to contact them instead). I would call them, then follow up with an email or fax so you have a dated proof of a contact date. I would also ask them why they want you to sign the statement.

Good Luck,

Tamara

PS. I don't like insurance companies....I'm still fighting a bill from my surgey from 2005, for an in-patient (no co-pay) that they keep saying was an out patient doctor and wnt me to pay the balance of 109K......imagine that!!! Let me just get out my checkbook :lol:

Have a great day!!!

tdak

"Government is like a baby. An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no sense of responsibility at the other. "...Ronald Reagan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use