Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Good Article

Rate this question


carlie

Question

Sorry, I was unable to delete the advertisement portion.

Hope this helps a vet.

carlie

http://www.newsday.com/news/columnists/ny-...news-columnists

Return from battle is start of new fight

June 15, 2007

talkbackbutton.gif Here's an early distress call, as our soldiers slowly return home from Iraq and Afghanistan.

Not all wounds are as easily visible as the broken bones, the missing limbs or the shrapnel from IEDs. But these are every bit as debilitating - and potentially even more widespread.

01 quigo_300top.gifquigo_300bottom.gifAs today's generation of war vets struggles to put their lives back in order, more and more of them are slipping into alcoholism and drug abuse. No one knows the full extent of the problem. But experts and advocates are beginning to voice alarm.

"One in three veterans is now returning with some form of PTSD," said Paul Rieckhoff, director of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, using the acronym for post-traumatic stress disorder. "They face a VA system with a 600,000-case backlog, a system where people are waiting 170 days for mental health treatment."

"So what do you do while you're waiting?" Rieckhoff asked. "Your rage is growing. You're fighting with your wife. You're trying to deal with housing and employment. Often - not always, but often enough - people are turning to alcohol and drugs."

"It's a real problem and a growing one," agreed Tony Newman of the reform-minded Drug Policy Alliance. "We have these vets self-medicating, then ending up in jail instead of getting the help they need."

Drug and alcohol abuse is a tragic, maybe even inevitable, consequence of going to war. And none of this should come as a surprise.

We require our soldiers to do things that no civilian is ever asked to do. Live for months on end in constant danger. Come face to face with carnage every day. Try to tell the friends from the enemies. Decide in an instant who lives and who dies.

Of course, no one's life is ever the same after that. And sometimes, for awhile at least, drugs and alcohol can ease the pain.

"They're coming back traumatized," said Dr. David E. Smith, executive medical director of the PROMETA Centers, one of America's leading drug-addiction specialists. "These people are entering the drug scene, the alcohol scene. Just like in Vietnam, they got beaten up and battered in an unpopular war. Don't we have some responsibility to help them?"

No one can match Smith's historical perspective on the returning vets and substance abuse. For 39 years, he ran the Haight-Ashbury Free Clinic in San Francisco, a frontline fighter as the Summer of Love gave way to some very long winters of addiction, self-destruction, recovery and relapse.

But that history gives Smith some hope, as well. With so many fresh veterans suffering from drug and alcohol abuse the last time, he said, society began to look at addiction through a different lens.

Suddenly, the addict wasn't just some street bum. He was a soldier fresh out of uniform. That still meant something - and means something - in America.

"In the '60s, we were detoxing addicts and getting arrested for doing it," Smith said. "The only way we could support the clinic was with benefit rock concerts" featuring bands like the Grateful Dead, Creedence Clearwater Revival and Big Brother and the Holding Company.

By the 1970s though, addicted vets were on the street, and treatment became more palatable politically. "All of a sudden, the feds were coming around, giving us grants," the clinic founder said. "What changed? We were doing the same thing in the same place. But all of a sudden, we had these veterans coming home from Vietnam, strung out."

No two wars are the same. And there are some differences between the two eras. For one thing, Paul Rieckhoff said, drug abuse on the battlefield is not quite as common this time, despite Afghanistan's role as the world's primary poppy supplier.

"This time, the troops are in much closer confines," the vet leader said. "The discipline is tighter. It's a professional army, not a drafted army. The soldiers are drug-tested more often."

The good news is that most of them will return home alive.

The bad news? They'll be dealing with a whole range of tough life challenges. And if we don't find some ways to help them, too many will ease their pain in all the wrong ways.

email.gif Email: henican@newsday.com

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

0 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There have been no answers to this question yet

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use