Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Effective Dates

Rate this question


free_spirit_etc

Question

" (2) The effective date of an award of increased compensation

shall be the earliest date as of which it is ascertainable that an

increase in disability had occurred, if application is received

within one year from such date."

So - is this talking about an increased RATING for something that was already granted SC --or increased compensation - in general.

In my husband's case - If he was 20% Service Connected on his back and knee - but recieves an increased COMPENSATION based on his cancer -- can the claim go back to the date it can be shown the increase in disability occured - if he filed within one year of that date?

With all the talk of Congress being specific where Congress intended to be specific --

Is an increase in disability only increased ratings in disabilities already SC'd? Or does an increase in disability also include percentage of disability increasing due to an additional Service Connected condition?

Free

Free

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

" (2) The effective date of an award of increased compensation

shall be the earliest date as of which it is ascertainable that an

increase in disability had occurred, if application is received

within one year from such date."

yah, what does it mean..............

Betrayed

540% SC Schedular P&T

LOWER YOUR EXPECTATIONS AND THE VA WILL MEET THEM !!!

WEBMASTER BETRAYEDVETERAN.COM

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You hit the street, you feel them staring you know they hate you you can feel their eyes a glarin'

Because you're different, because you're free, because you're everything deep down they wish they could be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Free -the effective date for an initial award is either the date of application asking VA to SC the disability or in some cases- by documented medical evidence- possibly a year earlier than that-

Most EEDs are the date of the claim.

The regulation you mention is for applications for increase.

I would think that the EED for your husband's cancer is the date he filed the initial claim.

If he had ever filed a prior claim for it and was denied- and it is an AO cancer under Nehmer-other regs kick in.

Example: Say the vet has had 20% for SC of her DMII from AO for 3 years.(Vietnam veteran)

She feels she should be within a higher rating criteria per the VA's rating schedule as her DMII has increased in its disabling affect.

She applies for increased disability on March 1, 2007.

Her medical evidence supports the claim.

The VA awards back to her EED ,March 1, 2007.

Or she could ask for service connection of disabling complications of her DMII (I would raise both issues in this type of claim)

SHe has developed cataracts that are more than likely due to her SC DMII.

She files a claim for secondary service connection on March 1, 2007.

Her EED is March 1, 2007.

There are many situations (as described within Chapter 8 of the VBM-an entire chapter devoted to how veterans can challenge an EED.

Also new veterans who file claims within their first yeat after service receive an EED back to the day after their separation from the military.

The Nehmer COurt Order threw EEDs for many many AO Vietnam vets right out of the ballpark.

Say the veteran above had filed for SC for DMII prior to DMII being added to the regs in May 2001.

She had a denial and a rating of DMII as NSC at 20% in a decision regarding a claim she had filed in Jan 1999.

Her EED is January 1999.

Full Retroactive benefits are payable to estates and survivors also in many cases under Nehmer that

in claims not involved with Nehmer the survivors can not get.

In one case per NVLSP-(page 631) the surviving spouse received full retroactive compensation that was due the veteran in his lifetime-from 1988 to May 1995.

This is not an accrued benefit-

38 CFR 3.816(f) (2006)

That is almost the very same scenario I am in- as my husband first manifested DMII from AO in VA med recs in 1988.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3.400(o)(2) applies only to disabilities which are already service-connected. New disabilities are rated as Berta described and Nehmer and liberalizing legislation are two things to consider with the effective date assigned for any presumptive disability associated with herbicide exposure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Free,

Basically what this means is if a veteran puts in a claim for an increase within ayear of the disability actually increasing in severity, then the effective date may go back to the date of when the actually increase in disability happened. In order for this to happen, the medical records must clearly show that the disability actually increased to a certain amount. For example, let's say you apply for an increase on May 1, 2007 for a lower back condition that is currently rated at 10% due to forward flexion at 70 degrees. Then the VA grants the increase effective May 1, 2007, but the actually worsening of the lower back started on November 1, 2006, with decreased forward flexion of less that 60 degrees or incapacitating episodes between 2-4 weeks within the past 12 months, which was documented by medical records. The VA can assign an effective date of November 1, 2006 instead of May 1, 2007, because the medical evidence actually show an increase in disability that happened within one year of you filing the claim for an increase. The senario happens many times with claims for IU.

The only thing to keep in mind that the medical evidence must actually show a woresening of the condition, not just simply the veteran stating that on such and such a date their condition seemed to get worse.

Vike 17

Edited by Vike17
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vike - I am a little confused. Lets say a vet has SC for a back issue rated at 10 percent (forward flexion problem). On Jan 15 2004 he/she tries to tie their shoe but can not bend over that far without extereme pain so they petition the VA for a higher rating due to their current inability to tie their shoe. Request for increase is received by the RO on 30 Jan 2004. With the backlog the RO finally gets to the claim in June 2005 (18 months later). A C&P is scheduled and happens in Sep 2005. At the C&P the doc determines that flexion is limited to a percentage that qualifies the veteran for a 40 percent rating.

The RO issues the rating decision in Dec 2005. What will/should the effective date be? The date the VA received the request for increase with the vets statement describing/claiming the increase - the date of the C&P exam or the date of the rating decision?

Thanks

Ricky

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe in this example the effective date for increased compensation would be

30 Jan 2004 - the date VA received the request for increase.

jmho,

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use