Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

A Few Questions

Rate this question


Keith85

Question

Three things I filed for:

1) Hernia pain - Had surgery on a naval base, scar tissue casued pain - service connected

2) Personality disorder (Reason for discharge, Honorable)

3) Hernia Scar

Granted:

1) Hernia scar - 10%

My question is why was I denied a rating on my hernia pain - They even admitted it was service connected. They said I did wear a device, so they would not grant it (Something along those lines, I have lost the paperwork during a move - Any way for the VA to get me a copy of the rating review? And also, if they admit is service connected how could they give me 0% rating. It causes pain at work as well as at home.

Also, I was denied on the personality disorder, but never spoke with a phyciatrist. I was discharged due to a service connected personality disorder.

Last, its been a year, and I didn't really know about the appeals proccess. I guess I will have to resubmit a claim? My scar has cleared up a bit, will they review that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

IMO?

Keith

I would say you got the green weenie on that PD thing. They did not diagnose you because they did not want to pay for a mental/medical condition. I did have a lot of experience with the PD thing in the Army and with the VA. I believe with a good IMO you can get this thing changed. I did it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keith,

1) has a medical doctor or mental health doc ever provided a written diagnosis of PTSD

and/or provided any treatment for such condition ? If the answer is yes, then

2) what do they state, in their medical opinion, is the traumatic event that is the cause

of your PTSD ?

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Josephine,

You asked, "I read what you posted, but what is a " Personality Disorder"? Epilepsy? Dementia?"

The earlier post that I made refers to:

Example: Prior to active duty, claimant has NO mental health, behavorial or adjustment

problems. While on active duty, claimant sustains a head injury and begins having

seizures (epilepsy), or begins exhibiting signs and symptoms of a personality disorder,

if the doctor states that there is no evidence or indication of a personality disorder prior to

trauma to the brain, they have reviewed the SMR's and reports of XXXX dated XXX,

and in their medical opinion, the personality disorder is as likely as not, a result of the brain trauma the claimant received during injury documented in SMR's dated XXXX and/or

etc....

Does that clarift anything, if not - let me know.

You keep on fighting your claim woman !

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Keith

An IMO is an independent medical opinion. If you get a good one from a doctor who knows how to write what the VA wants to hear you can really turn your claim around to the right side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Josephine,

You asked, "I read what you posted, but what is a " Personality Disorder"? Epilepsy? Dementia?"

The earlier post that I made refers to:

Example: Prior to active duty, claimant has NO mental health, behavorial or adjustment

problems. While on active duty, claimant sustains a head injury and begins having

seizures (epilepsy), or begins exhibiting signs and symptoms of a personality disorder,

if the doctor states that there is no evidence or indication of a personality disorder prior to

trauma to the brain, they have reviewed the SMR's and reports of XXXX dated XXX,

and in their medical opinion, the personality disorder is as likely as not, a result of the brain trauma the claimant received during injury documented in SMR's dated XXXX and/or

etc....

Does that clarift anything, if not - let me know.

You keep on fighting your claim woman !

carlie

Your example is a very good one. I understand your point here as it pertains to psychomotor seizures vs personality disorders. They can have simular symtoms and the Code in simplified form says to make sure suspected psychomotor siezures are not actually PD's. Without clearcut evidence of seizures, the service member will likely be given the PD diagnoses. Evidence and/or diagnoses of these small weird seizures is very, very hard to get.

I'm unsure of why you'd consider dementia as a PD. There is no relationship between the two that I know of. There is a relationship between dementia and mood disorders but mood disorders simply mask the dementia so it is not diagnosed.

Personality change is the #1 indicator to family and friends that a head injury has caused major problems. Unfortunatly, few realize what has caused the change. For me and countless other soldiers/Vets it is assumed that "the war changed him". But these are usually mood disorders, or misdiagnosed as mood disorders not PD's. Those that are misdiagnosed as PD's, before a head injury is suspected, are rediagnosed with dementia, mood disorders, cognative dissorders and other residuales, but not PD's.

I have both psychomotor seizures and dementia due to head trauma along with a long list of other residuals.

The case below is very simular to mine except I was hospitalized for a couple of weeks for my head injury and still was undiagnosed for years.

VIDEO: TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY - ONE OF THE WOUNDS

Time

Edited by timetowinarace
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Keith,

You can turn this thing around. You need to get the IMO while you are still young and fresh out of service.

I am fighting a claim that goes back to 1978, as the VA, did not acquire my "Psychiatric Records".

They are " New and Material Evidence" and now some 43 years later, the VA wants to tell me that my doctors have been treating me for the incorrect illness all of these years.

This don't jive in my eyes.

On this one, I shall continue to fight them. I have been to the BVA and remanded to The Appeals Management Center awaiting their answer and if it is a denial, then to the courts, I will go next.

I had hoped to have a lawyer at this stage, but the new regulation does not allow me this.

Thanks, Carlie, and Time, Now I understand what you were saying.

Always,

Joephine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use