Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

I Don't Think This Is The Right Forum

Rate this question


jecsb4

Question

I don't think this is the right forum but a Vet friend of mine seems to be going through a seperation and divorce. he is SC 50% and his spouse says she will take his disability.

I would think that it may be different in various states. he lives in FL.

Anyone know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

When my husband was 50% SC his ex-wife tried to get part of his disability. She never was awarded any of it. As far as I know VA disability can't be attached or given as a part of a divorce. I really don't know the rule,but here is a ruling.

The supreme court then addressed the problem of whether the trial court had had subject-matter jurisdiction in the matter of the VA disability income. The court found that military retirement benefits cannot constitute divisible marital property except to the extent permitted by the Uniformed Services Former Spouses' Protection Act (USFSPA), 10 U.S.C. 1401 et seq. Disability benefits are specifically not divisible marital property under the USFSPA. Therefore, federal law precluded the lower court from exercising subject-matter jurisdiction over the VA disability benefits. The portion of the decree purporting to divide the husband's VA disability income was void for want of jurisdiction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is not divisible - HOWEVER, it is included in the income work-up to reach the final award of child support or alimony. So even if it is not divisible a veteran can lose part of his/her disability during a divorce. Once the court awards child support or alimony the court could care less if you have to use part of your disability to pay it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a pretty complicated issue. My husband was retired military and his ex got 18 percent of his retirement for the 10 years they were married (well - actually the 8 years they were "married" and the two years she dragged the divorce out while she lived with her boyfriend so the marriage could "last ten years) under the Former Spouse's protection Act.

When he got 20% SC from the VA - they adjusted his retirement pay - because he had to waive an amount equal to his VA disability. Her FSPA payment was reduced -and she did not get a percentage of his disability.

However there is fighting on this issue on both sides.

Some folks are fighting to get laws that require a spouse to "make up" whatever their ex lost due to the decreased payment based on the disability. So - the spouse won't "get" their disability - but they have to pay her the same amount as if they weren't disabled.

On the other side - some are trying to get laws passed that STOP states from changing court orders around to bypass the Supreme Court ruling that the spouse is not entitled to a portion of disability pay.

The Supreme Court ruled that disability can't be divisible as community property --but then many state courts are just awarding an equal amount and calling it something else.

So more than just know what the law is -- your friend will probably need to find out what the judges in his area are doing with the issue.

Free

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Free is right - it really depends which state court you are playing. Your attorney should be fully aware of such rules. If not I would look else where for legal support. Good Luck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

And a local Judge can just about do anything that they want. However, overriding all in my opinion is what is fair. Someone who has been married for at least a few years may owe but it would depend on circumstances. I am pretty sure that most would agree that most who live on disability income do not have a lot of extra.

In Texas most who live on disability would not have to pay and there is no alimony except for support through the divorce and up to 5 years in limited circumstances. You always have to consider how bad someone wants out and is willing to give up.

If I make it to August the 26th Mrs Pete and I will have been married 40 years but who is counting?

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use