Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

C-file Organization - If You Have Gone To The Va To Look At Your C-file

Rate this question


tssnave

Question

For those of you have who gone to the VA office and looked at your VA C-file, or for those of you who have been service reps and actually seen a working C-file, how does the VA organize a C-file?

When you send in a packet of information that has treatment reports, buddy statements, and medical narratives (or whatever) do they keep the packet together as you sent it in or do they tear it apart and put it in different places in the C-file?

Thanks,

TS

Edited by tssnave
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

I don't know exactly how they organize it but they are supposed to have a system. Many Veterans have found other Veterans Records in their files and the VA is infamous for missing records. That is even more reason to review your "C" File

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seemed like it was all together in chronological order. So if you send in a packet today - that will be placed in the file how you sent it -- and a letter they send to you next week will be next in the file.

At least that is the way it looked like it was organized. I didn't look through much of the file as I was digging through SMR's and they were TOTALLY unorganized (upside down, right side up, not in any chronological order.)

My husband bound the last packet he sent - and that was all together still bound.

The veteran benefit manual suggests that you do bind your material like THEY do --but I can't remember what that is. I think they holes in the top - with the little slide clip - so they can easily put it in the file they same way the papers they generate are attached.

And they recommend a cover sheet for your packet - which briefly lists the evidence you are sending - and the order.

Free

For those of you have who gone to the VA office and looked at your VA C-file, or for those of you who have been service reps and actually seen a working C-file, how does the VA organize a C-file?

When you send in a packet of information that has treatment reports, buddy statements, and medical narratives (or whatever) do they keep the packet together as you sent it in or do they tear it apart and put it in different places in the C-file?

Thanks,

TS

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Free,

Thanks for the suggestion. My copy they sent of the C-file was pretty much in chronological order but I didn't know if that was how they kept it in the actual files because the paperwork that went forward to the C&P examiner had my medical records tabbed, which is not something I'd done since they were submitted over the course of 3 years since I had to submit new records as I was treated during the long wait for VA to rate my claim. The tabbed medical records made me think that perhaps they pulled them and had the med recs in one spot and other documentation in another.

Hadn't thought about the double hole punch at the top but that makes sense. The copy marks on my copy of my C-file clearly show the double top holes. Again, thanks for the suggestion.

Pete - I know what you mean. When I got my copy of my C-file I was surprised to see that there were no personnel records in there whatsoever but there were a couple sheets of paper about my using my GI bill to go to college. Plus, there was actually one report where I went on sick call while I was on active duty and the doc requested a pysch eval that the VA completely ignored and was never listed as evidence nor was it one of the tabbed records the C&P examiner looked at (the report to her from the DRO said there were no relevant military medical records - go figure).

On the good side, there were numerous times that they did request my psych records from St Louis so at least I know they tried to get my psych records. Of course, reading the development notes was annoying - I wrote that I had NOT been see while I was in the Nat'l Guard and on their development paperwork it says "veteran claims to have been treated while in the NG" which is NOT what I wrote but they went on a wild goose chase for my NG records anyway. Makes you want to scream.

I agree with all the others that have said you need to get a copy of your C-file. At least you know what you're up against.

Thanks,

TS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use