Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Pulmonary Test Interpretation

Rate this question


HeathrowMan

Question

I had a pulmonary test and I don't know what it means

using the machine it said my FVC 74.4, FEV1 75.0, FEF25 - 75 = 73.5, FEV1/FVC % = 79

After Bronchodilator

FVC 72.7, FEV1 75.5, FEF25 - 75 = 83.7,FEV1/FVC % = 82

Interpretation: No obstructive lung defect indicated by the FEV1/FVC. There is a moderate restrictive lung defect. There is a decrease in diffusing capacity. FEF 25-75 changed by 14%. This is interpreted as an insignificant response to bronchodilator.

What is this telling me ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

I had a pulmonary test and I don't know what it means

using the machine it said my FVC 74.4, FEV1 75.0, FEF25 - 75 = 73.5, FEV1/FVC % = 79

Your pulmonary function tests are showing impairmnent in your lung function.

After Bronchodilator

FVC 72.7, FEV1 75.5, FEF25 - 75 = 83.7,FEV1/FVC % = 82

Interpretation: No obstructive lung defect indicated by the FEV1/FVC.

It isn't showing an OBSTRUCTIVE PATTERN

There is a moderate restrictive lung defect.

It IS showing a MODERATE RESTRICTIVE PATTERN

There is a decrease in diffusing capacity.

FEF 25-75 changed by 14%. This is interpreted as an insignificant response to bronchodilator.

The problem isn't helped by using bronchodialtor medicine.

What is this telling me ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Respiratory_disease

Obstructive lung disease

Emphysema

Bronchitis

Asthma

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)

Bronchiectasis

Byssinosis

Bronchiolitis

Asbestosis

Obstructive disease is characterized by an increase in airway resistance that is measured as a decrease in peak expiratory flow rates. In some cases, there is a miss-match between the FEV1/FVC ratio. The normal person exhales most of the inspired air in the 1st second; this ratio on normal subjects is around 0.8, this means that 80% of the expired air is expelled the 1st second.

[edit] Restrictive lung diseases

Fibrosis

Sarcoidosis

Alveolar Damage

Pleural effusion

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis

Asbestosis

Pleurisy

Lung Cancer

This pattern is characterized by an increase of the force trying to collapse the lung (recoil) and a decrease in lung compliance, measured as a decrease in all lung volumes. This is opposed to Obstructive in which you only have an increment of the values that take in to notice Residual Volumes (RV) such as TLC (Total Lung Capacity) and FRC (Functional Residual Capacity). In this case TLC is smaller than normal since the recoil force in the lung is greater than what it should be, the FEV1/FVC ratio will also be altered but instead of being lower than normal it will be higher than normal.

As previously stated FEV1/FVC should be around 0.8, in Obstructive Disease is lower, in Restrictive Disease since the amount of air going in is a lot less than in a normal or an obstructive pattern, the ratio appears to be higher (more than 80%) this is because a the smaller volume is expired quickly and more completely than in a normal pattern

http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/003854.htm

Diffusing capacity; DLCO test

Definition

Lung diffusion testing is used to determine how well oxygen passes from the air sacs of the lungs into the blood. The test measures the "diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide" or DLCO.

How the test is performed

You breath in (inhale) some gas containing a very small quantity of carbon monoxide, hold your breath for 10 seconds, then rapidly blow it out (exhale). The single exhaled gas is analyzed to determine how much carbon monoxide was absorbed during the breath.

Why the test is performed

The test is used to diagnose the presence and extent of certain lung diseases. It may also be used to see how gases move the lungs into the bloodstream.

What abnormal results mean

Abnormal results generally mean that gases do not move normally across the lung tissues. This may mean that lung diseases, such as interstitial fibrosis, sarcoidosis, asbestosis, and emphysema, are present.

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can find §4.97 Schedule of ratings—respiratory system. - at this link

http://www.warms.vba.va.gov/regs/38CFR/BOOKC/PART4/S4_97.DOC

That will show more what these numbers mean in relation to percent of disability within the VA rating system.

Free

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I have paralyzed diaphragm from a neck injury. I have a moderate to severe restriction with pulmonary hypertension. .

What is your diffusion capacity? and have you ever been diagnosed with pulmonary hypertension.

Pulmonary hypertension associated with lung disease is a 100 percent rating regardless of the lung volumes.

Restrictive Lung Disease

6840 Diaphragm paralysis or paresis.

6841 Spinal cord injury with respiratory insufficiency.

6842 Kyphoscoliosis, pectus excavatum, pectus carinatum.

6843 Traumatic chest wall defect, pneumothorax, hernia, etc.

6844 Post-surgical residual (lobectomy, pneumonectomy, etc.).

6845 Chronic pleural effusion or fibrosis.

General Rating Formula for Restrictive Lung Disease (diagnostic codes 6840 through 6845):

FEV–1 less than 40 percent of predicted value, or; the ratio of Forced Expiratory Volume in one second to Forced Vital Capacity (FEV–1/FVC) less than 40 percent, or; Diffusion Capacity of the Lung for Carbon Monoxide by the Single Breath Method (DLCO (SB)) less than 40-percent predicted, or; maximum exercise capacity less than 15 ml/kg/min oxygen consumption (with cardiac or respiratory limitation), or; cor pulmonale (right heart failure), or; right ventricular hypertrophy, or; pulmonary hypertension (shown by Echo or cardiac catheterization), or; episode(s) of acute respiratory failure, or; requires outpatient oxygen therapy 100

FEV–1 of 40- to 55-percent predicted, or; FEV–1/FVC of 40 to 55 percent, or; DLCO (SB) of 40- to 55-percent predicted, or; maximum oxygen consumption of 15 to 20 ml/kg/min (with cardiorespiratory limit) 60

FEV–1 of 56- to 70-percent predicted, or; FEV–1/FVC of 56 to 70 percent, or; DLCO (SB) 56- to 65-percent predicted 30

FEV–1 of 71- to 80-percent predicted, or; FEV–1/FVC of 71 to 80 percent, or; DLCO (SB) 66

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I currently am rated 10% Hypertension, 10% heart condition and 50% sleep apnia. My diffusion method reads DLCO-SB L 33.43 18.70 55.9 25.23

In addition chest xray showed a vague new modular density measuring approximately 4 mm in the right upper lobe. Cat scan reading was benign but I mst go back in 3 months, 6 months 12 months and 24 months.

I worked in the Pentagon for eleven years as well as a tropo site where my office was inside the comm/power plant office.

I don't know if I was exposed to anything at the tropo site but the Pentagon did go through renovation because of asbestos.

Have I been exposed to anything that may put me in harms way and should I put in a claim based on these results. I now have a slight cough. Any help would be appreciated.

Edited by HeathrowMan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The VA Examiner who did my PFT told me I had Sleep Apnea, I already knew but it blew me away he knew. He showed me a little flat spot in the graph printout and said thats how I know. I am still waiting for the VA to adjudicate my claim for asbestosis/restrictive lung disease. I found out recently they were waiting on a VCAA Election form b4 adjudicating my claim.

Betrayed

540% SC Schedular P&T

LOWER YOUR EXPECTATIONS AND THE VA WILL MEET THEM !!!

WEBMASTER BETRAYEDVETERAN.COM

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You hit the street, you feel them staring you know they hate you you can feel their eyes a glarin'

Because you're different, because you're free, because you're everything deep down they wish they could be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use