Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

How Is The Va Doing?

Rate this question


Pete53

Question

  • Answers 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Yes, when I was in the process of my claim, I also thought I was getting the runaround, too, and that the VA was just trying to save money by denying me. But I wasn't sure how much of that was actually the truth and how much was due to some possible desperation and/or a paranoid reaction on my part (real or imagined). As it turned out, maybe the merit of my claim was not as "obvious" as I thought it was. Even so, it was also true that had the VARO gone by its own regs, I would not have had to go all the way to the BVA. So it was probably both our faults.

But was there some "dark conspiracy" involved here to make me wait that long due to arbitrary denials along the way?

I can't say there was.

I know it may still seem that way to some of us, maybe even a lots of us, that the VA is out to "jip" vets in order to deny them of any benefite due (not including the false or no-merit claims, that is, which SHOULD be denied), but I believe the delays/problems are mainly from the overwhelming workload/backlog, inexperience of new VA employees, not enough VA employees to meet present needs, and some degree of flat-out error re: decisions...rather than any planned, official or unofficial VA policy of "screw the vets."

And until I see a smoking-gun memo that someone smuggled out of some VARO or VA-HQ saying there really IS such a policy -- probably from the top (i.e., the White House or the Secretary of Veterans Affairs) that orders all VA employees to deny rather than grant, use delay tactics so the vet gives up or dies -- regardless of the merits of the case or deny in order to save money -- then I can't presently believe there is any VA conspiracy against veterans. Screwups, yes, but not any delierate policy to mess with vets.

Now if such a memo ever comes to light, then I will be first in line to nail the SOBs against the wall and the "leadership" responsbile should be jailed...but it's been DECADES now that these "VA misadventures" been going on and no such memo of any such "dark orders from the top" have surfaced. So I have to believe it's just the whole PROCESS -- claims process, claims backlog, employee training & experience, VA getting funded properly, etc. -- that is the problem, not that the VA is really out to get vets.

-- John D.

There is so many failed areas in the system and as you said I don't think they are out to get the vets. It's inexperience of the triage teams. SO nay claims and few workers and the vet not having the resources and no-how to file and present his evidence to the satisfaction of the law for grating the claim. Good post and I think you are right on. The main thing that I see that needs improved is more teams handling less claims and more communication with the vet during the decision making period.

danang_1969

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The VA just wants to save money. It is not a conspiracy. It is just cheapness and a lack of regard for vets. Now I see Dole says older vets may have to settle for less to help the Iraq vets. He does not depend on his compensation to live. He lived off the taxpayers for 40 years in politics. I bet he has a nice pension and the best health care money can buy. What a miserable bastard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dole the politican (not his military service) is a pathetic individual. Known as a "Great Compromiser," ANYthing on the table was fair game for compromising it away or watering it down, whether the issues be VA benefits or US Constitutional civil rights.

Frankly, anyone can compromise...what's so great about that? But it takes real convictions to stand for something. Dole doesn't have that.

And as has been said here before -- partly due to the "new and improved small all-volunteer military" vs. a draft system getting everyone into military service for at least a few years -- vets are a very small minority few politicians will care about.

Heck, many don't even care about the ACTIVE duty military, let alone vets.

-- John D.

Edited by cloudcroft

70% TDIU/P&T

Army - RVN - 1969-70 (10th Cav/4th ID, II Corps RVN)

USCG - Galveston, TX - 1976-78 (USCGC Valiant, WMEC 621)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Well any Vets treated differently today will probably learn what can happen tomorrow.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great topic with great ending results for the veteran. It kind of makes one say to himself is there more that could be done me. So, as ideas come to me I think that on my good days that I have, I may just check with some of the homeless vets and see how I can help them get started, if they haven't already submitted a claim for benefits. Thanks Pete for starting this topic.

jmack

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"dark conspiracy" Nope you are right. However, it is not just the just the things you spoke of. Yes they contribute to the problem. However, one must remember - although the VA is setup to take care of veterans, it is the governments equivilant to a civilian disability insurer's claims processers. One must remember that a VA claim is simply a claim filed AGAINST the United States. Nothing more, nothing less.

As a matter of fact a civilian disability claims department is sometimes much easier to deal with than the VA due to the thing called accountability. If a civilian disability insurance company steps too far out of line they will find themselves in civil court and possible criminal court if their intentions were intentional and a violation of law.

The VA system, notice I did not say the people, was designed as a self check type of system. This self check is sided against the claimant and not the system. Yes, yes I know we have congress. But remember who the partent company is - The U.S. Government. This has been proven time and time again at great expense to the taxpayers. How many useless and costly commissions, studies and hearings have been setup or held to find out why the backlog is so large? or why it takes 4 years to process a claim etc....... You could count 24 hours a day for a month and could not count them all. And the result? VA testifying to congress or the budget or the GAO. And the outcome - VA stating each and every time "We'll fix it now". Hmmmm..... seems as though the fix it now syndrome is chronic with continuity since they have suffered from it since the 50's and the problems addressed then still are problems today. NO Accountability. Now I blame this on the government (congress and the administrations over the years. Its not a dem/republic thing it is a government thing. You get these elite ones up there who know all and they spend billions of dollars trying to save thousands and pull votes. The government does it in all things not just the VA. No matter how much we can save on a hammer by conducting the correct or common sense process in the purchasing, some idiot politician, an elite one, knows a better process. This better process expands into several commissions and then studies to study the commission's recommendation, costing millions, then we do it the idiots way and the damn things cost billions when what we needed would have only set us back a few hundreds of thousands - in the end one of the other elite smart ones finds fraud after all of them break during use and we are back to more commissions and studies...... the cycle goes on.

It is the same with the VA. They, the government (Not the VA) will spend billions just to save a few million.

I ranted a little :blink: but remember the key points - no accountability to ANYONE and no matter what type of claim you are filing you are FILING A CLAIM AGAINST THE U.S. GOVERNMENT! Don't scream at me and yes I do know that we earned benefits with our service, but does not a civilian also earn benefits for the payment of their money for disability insurance? Sameo - sameo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use