hurryupnwait Posted November 3, 2007 Share Posted November 3, 2007 Maybe we should compare notes and exchange information. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HadIt.com Elder Josephine Posted November 3, 2007 HadIt.com Elder Share Posted November 3, 2007 Maybe we should compare notes and exchange information. Paul, I just borrowed some of yours. To: Rating Specialist Letter received November 3, 2007. Review and give New Medical Opinion Remand has been satisfied with the October 06, 2006 request for New Medical Opinion. I shall remind you. Mariano V Principi Vet. App 305, 312 is applicable to this issue. This claim has been at the Appeals Management Center 780 days. I do not feel that this is following the BVA remand that states. " This claim must be afforded expeditious treatment". Advancement on the Docket signed by Nancy Robin. March 06, 2006. All the evidence is with the Appeals Management Center. Decide this claim with the evidence that you have on record, as of this date November 3, 2007. Thanks, Josephine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HadIt.com Elder Pete53 Posted November 3, 2007 HadIt.com Elder Share Posted November 3, 2007 Josephine: That should do the trick. No use waiting in penalty box any longer waiting on those deadbeat shrinks who screwed you in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hurryupnwait Posted November 5, 2007 Author Share Posted November 5, 2007 So are Josephine and I, the only people with claims at the AMC? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hurryupnwait Posted November 5, 2007 Author Share Posted November 5, 2007 Paul, I just borrowed some of yours. To: Rating Specialist Letter received November 3, 2007. Review and give New Medical Opinion Remand has been satisfied with the October 06, 2006 request for New Medical Opinion. I shall remind you. Mariano V Principi Vet. App 305, 312 is applicable to this issue. This claim has been at the Appeals Management Center 780 days. I do not feel that this is following the BVA remand that states. " This claim must be afforded expeditious treatment". Advancement on the Docket signed by Nancy Robin. March 06, 2006. All the evidence is with the Appeals Management Center. Decide this claim with the evidence that you have on record, as of this date November 3, 2007. Thanks, Josephine I m honored that I may be able to help you. You have given me alot of valuable information. Right now, I m waiting for Dr. Bash's IMO, my letter and my duty assignments form be logged in at AMC then I plan a calling and writing campaign for them to make a decision. This is my plan: Ask my congresspersons to write one letter asking for the AMC to make a decision within two weeks. Calling the AMC director, asking for same. Send a certified letter from me about every two weeks asking for same. Happy Trails Paul Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carlie Posted November 6, 2007 Share Posted November 6, 2007 I have several issues that were remanded from BVA to AMC and I haven't contacted anyone -- and I'm sure I should be following this up some. carlie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HadIt.com Elder Josephine Posted November 6, 2007 HadIt.com Elder Share Posted November 6, 2007 I m honored that I may be able to help you. You have given me alot of valuable information. Right now, I m waiting for Dr. Bash's IMO, my letter and my duty assignments form be logged in at AMC then I plan a calling and writing campaign for them to make a decision. This is my plan: Ask my congresspersons to write one letter asking for the AMC to make a decision within two weeks. Calling the AMC director, asking for same. Send a certified letter from me about every two weeks asking for same. Happy Trails Paul Paul. On mine I had to take out the part about the Mariano V Principi Vet. App 305, 312 is applicable to this issue. As Berta reminded me, I had a negative being sent back for a New Opinion. How can they make a negative any more negative than it already is. This would apply to Dr. Mullers More likely than Not and then the C&P 5 months later for the denial. It sure was nice to be able to go in an paste the other regulations that I needed. Thanks a bunch, Your plan seems to be falling right into place. Always, Josephine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Question
hurryupnwait
Maybe we should compare notes and exchange information.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
28
21
8
5
Popular Days
Dec 5
13
Dec 4
12
Dec 6
10
Nov 30
8
Top Posters For This Question
Josephine 28 posts
hurryupnwait 21 posts
allan 8 posts
Pete53 5 posts
Popular Days
Dec 5 2007
13 posts
Dec 4 2007
12 posts
Dec 6 2007
10 posts
Nov 30 2007
8 posts
82 answers to this question
Recommended Posts