Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Failed Military Entrance Exam/medical Waiver

Rate this question


william n

Question

failed physical exam...[bi-lateral knees]went in on med. waiver... in med. records[1973] it states, "i wish to discharge, due to medical condition[knees]..Dr. responds in notes,"wishes to discharge early,due to condition of knees,refer to medical board for consideration..will that letter support my claim for bilateral knee disease,service connection????thanks, williamn

william

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

But you were allowed re-entry?

WHat does that re-entry entrance exam say?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Berta, he's not saying he was allowed "re-entry", he's saying that to enlist he had to sign a waiver due to his already existing, prior to service, knee condition, I think.

Lessee if I've got this correctly:

You signed a waiver, due to your knees, that would allow you to enlist. Is this correct?

You entered service with this bi-lateral knee condition, for which you had signed a waiver stating that you wished to enlist, and would not hold the particular service responsible for anything that should occurr to your knees (you must have, otherwise it would not be considered a "waiver", right?).

Now you want to hold the service responsible for your knees?

What do you think the answer to your question is going to be?

"It is cold and we have no blankets.

The little children are freezing to death.

My people, some of them, have run away to the hills, and have no blankets, no food; no one knows where they are-perhaps freezing to death.

I want to have time to look for my children and see how many of them I can find.

Maybe I shall find them among the dead.

Hear me, my chiefs! I am tired; my heart is sick and sad.

From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever."

Chief Joseph

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no berta, the first exam was when i failed.[70's] i then was allowed in on a "medical waiver" from the dept of medicine and surgery in Washington,D.C. after i requested {written} entry. after a few years my knees got so bad i wanted out. williamn

william

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nope i did not say i would not hold them responsible....it states " you are allowed entry into the service and you must follow any request made by the MO for treatment and/or surgery" then comes my signature...williamn

william

Link to comment
Share on other sites

exam says "failed" due to yada yada of the knees/bilateral..i was informed that i should request a waiver from D.C. and did that. In i went with that signed stip saying i would follow any recomm. by the med officer where ever i end up.

william

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are similiar claims like this at the BVA web site-

Now I understand this better-

you signed waiver for Pre existing disability-

and you would have to prove that military service 'aggravated 'that disability to a compensable degree.

"The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

(Federal Circuit Court) recently addressed the presumption of

aggravation in the case of Davis v. Principi, 276 F.3d 1341

(2002). The Federal Circuit Court stated that "[w]here a

veteran can show an increase in a preexisting disability,

section 1153 establishes a finding of aggravation." Davis,

276 F.3d at 1343. The Federal Circuit Court also observed

that "[t]he statute, however, expressly excludes from

aggravation any increase in disability attributable to the

natural progress of the preexisting disease." Id. Thus, a

medical finding that an increase in a preexisting disability

during service was due to the natural progress of the disease

removes the disability from a presumption or finding of

aggravation."

from:http://www.va.gov/vetapp02/files02/0205585.txt

The mil used to say once a medical waiver is granted the disability can never be claimed for VA comp- but they dont say any aggravation of the waived disability can be compensated if it is 'aggravated' by service.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use