Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Awol Soldier: Army Didn’t Help With Ptsd

Rate this question


allan

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

fwd from Colonel Dan

also see: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.p...toryId=16330374

But an Army chart, which NPR recently received, shows that since the United States invaded Iraq:

— Commanders have discharged almost 20 percent more soldiers for "misconduct" than they did in the same period before the war;

— Commanders have discharged more than twice as many soldiers for "drug abuse" (a subset of the "misconduct" category);

— Commanders have discharged almost 40 percent more soldiers for "personality disorder."

In all, the Army has kicked out more than 28,000 soldiers since the war in Iraq began on the grounds of personality disorder and misconduct.

AWOL soldier: Army didn’t help with PTSD

By William Kates - The Associated Press

Posted : Friday Nov 16, 2007 6:55:14 EST

http://www.charter.net/news/news_reader.ph...&feedid=248

SYRACUSE, N.Y.— A soldier who served two combat tours in Iraq was arrested Wednesday as he was preparing to surrender to Fort Drum officials after spending more than a year AWOL seeking treatment for post traumatic stress disorder.

Sgt. Brad Gaskins, 25, of East Orange, N.J., said he left the northern New York post in August 2006 because the Army wasn’t providing effective treatment after he was diagnosed with PTSD and severe depression.

“They just don’t have the resources to handle it, but that’s not my fault,” said Gaskins, speaking at a press conference in Syracuse just hours before he was arrested at the Different Drummer Cafe in Watertown, less than 10 miles from Fort Drum.

Gaskins, an eight-year Army veteran who also did a peacekeeping tour in Kosovo, was taken into custody by two civilian police officers from Fort Drum and two Watertown city policeman, said Tod Ensign, an attorney with Citizen Soldier, http://www.citizen-soldier.org/ a GI rights group that is representing Gaskins. Ensign said he was on the phone with military prosecutors at Fort Drum working out the details of Gaskins’ surrender when the soldier was arrested.

Fort Drum spokesman Ben Abel said after a soldier is AWOL for more than 30 days he becomes classified as a deserter, and a federal arrest warrant is issued.

Abel said Gaskins would be turned over to his unit commanders, who will decide whether he is to be prosecuted or not.

Ensign said Gaskins’ case is part of a “coming tsunami” of mental health problems involving Iraq and Afghanistan veterans.

Last month, the Veterans Administration said more than 100,000 soldiers were being treated for mental health problems, and half of those specifically for PTSD.

“We hope they don’t just recycle him and push him back into the role of soldier. They need to see him as a badly injured person, and he needs to be treated that way,” said Ensign, whose organization previously represented Spc. Eugene Cherry, another Fort Drum soldier who was facing a court martial and a bad conduct discharge after going AWOL to get treatment until the Army softened its stance and gave him a general discharge in July.

Gaskins said he enlisted in 1999, excited to be serving his country and with the dream of becoming a policeman after fulfilling his military duty. He was scheduled for discharge in 2009.

In 2003, Gaskins was deployed to Iraq and said he served his first tour without incident. He was sent back to Iraq in June 2005, and his mental health began deteriorating.

In his second tour, Gaskins said his job was to conduct road searches and locate IEDs.

In one outing, Gaskins said his unit found an IED and were waiting for an explosives team to arrive to disarm it. An Iraqi police officer decided to shoot the IED, which caused an explosion that leveled a nearby house.

“It killed a family of four ... that sight will never leave my mind. These people were in their house eating their breakfast. They never had a chance,” Gaskins said.

The disturbing experiences continued. A friend in another unit was killed. Gaskins said he was in numerous gun battles, including one in which two Iraqi police officers were accidentally killed by his unit. His unit was ambushed several times, and he saw the aftermath of countless suicide bombings, including one that left 25 people dead.

“It takes its toll. It’s a constant fear every day,” he said.

Gaskins left Iraq in February 2006 and was transferred to the 10th Mountain Division at Fort Drum, where he sought help for his worsening mental problems.

Upon his return, he began suffering flashbacks and nightmares, headaches, sleeplessness, weight loss and mood swings that took him from depression to irrational rages, he said.

Military doctors sent Gaskins to the Samaritan Medical Center in Watertown, where he spent two weeks and was diagnosed with PTSD. He soon returned to his unit, but continued having problems. When he asked his commanders about returning to Samaritan, they told him it would delay any chance he had at obtaining a medical release.

“There is a stigma that comes with seeking help, and you basically jeopardize your entire career,” Gaskins said.

At the time, the Fort Drum mental health facility had a staff of a dozen caring for approximately 17,000 troops, Ensign said.

Over the past year, Fort Drum has expanded its mental health facility staff to 31, with plans to add 17 staffers, Abel said. “Is there a need for more — yes,” he said.

Abel said he was unaware of the specifics of Gaskins’ case and declined to comment on it.

Unable to get proper help, Gaskins said he requested a two-week leave and went home to New Jersey, where he had one of his most worrisome experiences.

“My wife came home late one night and startled me awake. I think I blacked out. I ran at her with a knife and almost stabbed her. I didn’t know what I was doing ... I don’t want to hurt anybody,” said Gaskins, who said he hasn’t been able to find a job because of his PTSD.

Gaskins and his wife are separated as he tries to deal with his mental problems. He has only supervised visitation rights with his two children, a 3-year-old son and a 9-year-old stepdaughter.

Gaskins said he called Fort Drum officials, told them about the incident and said he wasn’t coming back.

“They never sent anyone to help me,” Gaskins said, adding, “I never attempted to hide. I stayed at my house.”

__._,_.___

"Keep on, Keepin' on"

Dan Cedusky, Champaign IL "Colonel Dan"

See my web site at:

http://www.angelfire.com/il2/VeteranIssues/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 1
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

1 answer to this question

Recommended Posts

Re: "...But an Army chart, which NPR recently received, shows that since the United States invaded Iraq:

— Commanders have discharged almost 20 percent more soldiers for "misconduct" than they did in the same period before the war;

— Commanders have discharged more than twice as many soldiers for "drug abuse" (a subset of the "misconduct" category);

— Commanders have discharged almost 40 percent more soldiers for "personality disorder."

In all, the Army has kicked out more than 28,000 soldiers since the war in Iraq began on the grounds of personality disorder and misconduct."

_______________________________________________________

Comment: Full disclosure-- I have no doubt that PTSD is real and a legitimate disability.

With that said, I look at the "discharged" and "misconduct" statistics a bit differently than some, based on my experience during Desert Storm. A portion of my unit in Germany was designated to be a part of a provisional unit during the build up for Desert Storm. Approximately 22 soldiers (men and women) were selected from my battalion for the provisional unit that eventually deployed to Saudi Arabia and elsewhere. The training for the entire provisional unit took place at my location so I had an opportunity to see first-hand the training, morale, and conduct of all the soldiers temporarily assigned to the provisional unit. None of the soldiers from my battalion had previous charges of misconduct or any known disorders.

I will only address the actions of the soldiers originally assigned to my unit.

Nineteen of the 22 did great, performed admirally, and returned well-decorated. The actions of the other three (13.6%) included:

--A publically known attempt to become pregnant (she told many of her peers of her plan) via an anonymous donor (note: that failed and she was later incarcerated in Saudi Arabia for pointing her M-16 at her platoon sergeant)

--A myriad of misconduct events by another soldier, including multiple instances of insubordiation

--The third soldier, a male by the way, became emotionally overwhelmed about the concept of serving in a combat zone and became so ineffective that he did not deploy and was eventually discharged for "personality disorder."

The first two cases discussed above were despicable and both soldiers were discharged under other than honorable conditions. The third case was unfortunate, but his problem was not due to PTSD; he didn't even deploy!

The reason I bring this up is that when I see statistics like those forwarded by Colonel Dan, I cringe since it is not the full story. In my opinion, many of the soldiers cited in the Col. Dan article probably

received what they deserved. On the other hand, there are many soldiers who receive inadequate PTSD treatment and the military post closest to my location has been cited as one of the worst.

I realize that many/most of the vets on Hadit did not receive a fair deal by at least one Federal bureauacy (e.g., the VA), but not every action taken by the military with regard to discharges is illegitmate or unfair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use