Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

File Transfer Another Varo?

Rate this question


even_flow

Question

I recently received a 100 percent decision on a NOD. They gave me these letters for no tax on vehicles, house etc. If I move to another state and decide to buy a house am I going to have to request the VARO in my state move the file to my new state (if the new state has a tax exemption) or will they do it automatically? Thx.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder
Thanks. Honestly, after my experience with the first VARO I'd just assume leave the file here. What would I say in the letter to change my address? Just change the address and request my file be left where it is?

I would just notify them that the new mailing address of record should be blah,blah,blah. I've had my c-file in VT, for yrs and when I sent the VT RO a claim for type II diabetes, they saw my address was Idaho and sent it to the RO in Idaho. Idaho sent me a letter stating I'd filed a claim w/them - to which I responded that my claim was filed in VT (my RO of record) and that it should be returned to VT for development. Received a letter from the VT RO last week that they'd received my claim and were awaiting my file. I've since returned to VT but I keep it there cuz I know how they work and "I feel" they know my claims are valid and I'll eventually win. If I were you I'd leave it where it is and just change your mailing address when you move. You can always change it later. jmo

pr

Also, should you need a tax break letter, your RO can issue one and although it's issued from another state's RO it should be valid, provided you have your residence in the new state.

Edited by Philip Rogers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would just notify them that the new mailing address of record should be blah,blah,blah. I've had my c-file in VT, for yrs and when I sent the VT RO a claim for type II diabetes, they saw my address was Idaho and sent it to the RO in Idaho. Idaho sent me a letter stating I'd filed a claim w/them - to which I responded that my claim was filed in VT (my RO of record) and that it should be returned to VT for development. Received a letter from the VT RO last week that they'd received my claim and were awaiting my file. I've since returned to VT but I keep it there cuz I know how they work and "I feel" they know my claims are valid and I'll eventually win. If I were you I'd leave it where it is and just change your mailing address when you move. You can always change it later. jmo

pr

Also, should you need a tax break letter, your RO can issue one and although it's issued from another state's RO it should be valid, provided you have your residence in the new state.

Didn't know leaving the file in another state, even though you move, was an option. Thanks! That's what I'll do. Yeah...like you; I know how they work here. Whta a valuable piece of info. Also the examiners and VA here are nice. Seems like the rater pretty much goes off what the C and P examiner says. I didn't expect 100 percent but I'm not going to f with it considering what I went through with the last VARO. What struck me as odd was how much of the initial C and P examiner's report the first Decision Letter cut out. I know because it was included in the second Decision Letter. They were fair here and if they ever do bump me down at least I know it will be a fair decision.

In all honesty I know the DVA is overloeded but my last VARO I think goes over their limits in meddling--based on mine and other vets experiences that I've talked to. I'm not moving back there so I'm not worried about it though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"On the NOD... Since I used to work for the government I figured it would make the DROs job a lot easier if I sent the evidence with the NOD. That way I wouldn't have to wait for a request for new evidence and the DRO wouldn't have to dig through my large file. My VSO said that's the way to go."

SUPERB! I always send in more evidence with NODs.

They denied my CHap 35 but the NOD got it in 3 weeks- and then they forgot to credit my daughter's CHap 35 with the 7 years she had of mil service-and awarded her one MONTH of CHap 35 educational benefits- (she was due to turn 26-the cut off date)

My scathing NOD for her had again copy of her DD 214 ,the award letter again- the complete Chap 35 app-again- where she filled out the military credit part - but with the NOD I also sent them the actual Chap 35 regs that applied to her-or to any veteran with mil service applying for Chap 35.

3 weeks later she called me and they had fixed it all and sent her school the eligibility certificate-

this was VA Educational Department (an oxymoron)but I found the VARO itself can work faster sometimes with evidence sent with a NOD.

One NOD I was going to send-I changed it at the last minute to read this way-

To whom it may concern:

In a recent decision I received I think the VA made a mathematical error of 11,000 in retro as well as they sent me 3 DIC checks for the wrong year (300 less than they should be).

I enclosed the audit form they had sent and told them I am not too good at math but every time I figure it all out using the historic rate tables at the VA web site- the checks they sent seem short-either $300- or the $11,000 or both-

in 3 weeks I got both checks.

You are SO right- the NOD is the initial assault- pays to have a battle plan and to include with the NOD anything that can further support your claim.

I think sometimes reps prepare these NODs themselves for vets in a haphazard way-

the NOD is TOO important to let a rep control it without the vet's input-

best to prepare one yourself- as this vet did-

You must formally disagree with anything that isnt right- and tell them why-otherwise the VA concedes that you have accepted what you dont disagree with.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use