Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Deliberate Vcca/duty To Assist Noncompliance.

Rate this question


Guest morgan

Question

I am aware of a senate committee and an OIG investigation of a VA regional office and I'm wondering if someone here can answer some of my questions about it. In brief, the Senate Committee for Oversight of Veterans Affairs opened an investigation that is being worked through the regional chain of command. The regional director wrote a letter apologizing for issues brought to the committee and OIG's attention. He called the behavior of certain employees "unacceptable and unprofessional" and says he has taken "appropriate corrective action." An OIG investigation is now going forward.

My question: is it a serious matter when ratings employees are caught deliberately disregarding VCAA/duty to assist requirements in favor of meeting performance quotas? This was not a matter of failing to send a VCAA letter to the claimant, evidence submitted to the senate committee and the OIG is irrefutable, the intentional premature decision was made for the sake of meeting performance quotas. Doesn't this meet the level of being ILLEGAL rather than merely unacceptable and unprofessional? Will the OIG investigation likely go through the same regional director?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Gee-Last year I griped to the OIG,to the House and Senate Committee chairmen and to anyone who would listen as to how the VA has turned the VCAA into a scam-

not only that but my recent complaint to the Gen Counsel in DC- against y vet reps- brought up how many vet orgs are sitting back and allowing VCAA violations to occur- and not questioning them-adding to the lengthy backlog and the eventual BVA remand for a "redo of what GS 11 and 12 employees could not do in the first place"

I think this is exactly how I stated this to Congressman Filner on Dec 9th in SVR radio archives-

He said my proposed VCAA amendment and other stuff id being addressed by the HVAC after January as to reducing the backlog and attacking some of these RO problems.

Hard to say how this OIG investigation will go but they will probably post the results at their web site when it is done-

It is an absolute travesty of justice if any RO denies a claim without sending a VCAA letter or by sending one that is not incompliance with the VCAA regs.And illegal in my opinion as well as contradicted by their very job descriptions.

The OIG report of 2005 found that the RO goals of quantity and not quality reviews of claims at Ros was adding to the backlog and veterans were adversely affected by it all.

Our ultimate Duty to assist reg- the VCAA- has been turned into one more way to screw vets-in my opinion.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Berta

Too bad you could not get with some lawyer to file a class action kind of lawsuit. If the VA is disobeying the law some lawyer might want to make a big score on class action. The main complaintant in these things usually gets a big pay check as well. I was in one against the USPS. The ones who originated the class action got about 80,000 bucks a piece. The lawyers got millions. I got about 3500 bucks since I was just a member of the class. Check out the Glover Case class action. It is on the net under Glover Case. You just know if the VA sent you defective VCAA then they did it to thousands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it a serious matter - yes. Is it illegal - yes anytime a federal law is intenionally disregarded for person gain it is illegal. Will they go through the same director - yes that is the way the system is set up. No matter what the VA does any investigation by the VAOIG equates to = the chicken (OIG) looking over the wolves (VA). Will any of this do any good - NO. Look at the history. No matter what the VA does it is all settled with a we are a bad boy but we are sorry response to congress. Congress then goes away smiling saying look american public, look at what we have done for the veterans - we made them ole boys apoligize!!!!!

Don't believe me - just research any of the inquires that have been done on the VA - all of them have resulted in an apoligy and a promise to congress to do better next time. Then the VA simply goes on with business as usual until someone else screams foul. Then the process starts over again. Millions of dollars have been spent on investigations, studies, committes etc...... of the VA over the years and nothing has changed. jmho

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

This investigation will go the same way they all do. After it is finished a report will be filed and the VA will be racked over the coals and they will apologize profusely promise to fix it thank the Committee and file it in the trash with all the rest of them.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pete, I do not think they throw them in the trash. I believe they frame them and hang them on the hallway walls so all of the employees can see them. You know kinda like trophies B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use