Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Result Of C&p "less Likely Than Not"

Rate this question


Quint7

Question

Hi All,

I went and got the copy of my C&P for knee and back that was done 10 days ago. The results are unusual. I will start by saying that I claimed an increase for my 0% knee, a claim for my back being secondary to my knee and a reopening that my back alone is SC.

My measurements were:

Knee 0-90 degrees out of 140 degrees.

Back 0-20 degrees forward out of 90 degrees, 0-5 degrees extention out of 30 degrees, 0-20 degrees right lateral flextion out of 30 degrees, left and right rotation is 0-30 degrees out of 30 degrees.

The PA that examined me mentions that I have had therapy for both problems. She also mentions that I had a MRI and that it shows DDD and Stenisis along with disc buldge.

She then states that the "spine condition is less likely as not secondary to his right knee condition. The vet has a lot of other contributing factors to his back condition, including his occupation as a firefighter. The vet's gait was normal on exam today. The MRI findings do not support spinous condition as secondary from the right knee. It is more likely from other causes."

OK, a few things:

I had the actual MRI films with me and I asked the PA to look at them, to which she said "I don't need to, I have the report here".

I have been a firefighter for 11 years. I filed originally for my back upon my end of enlistment in 1994. I also saw a chiropractor in 1998 or 99 (XRays from then show some disc damage already) which is only 1 or 2 years into my firefighting career. She made no mention of this in person or her report yet it claims she reviewed my file.

She claims there are "a lot of other contributing factors" yet other than my job, she does not mention any.

As I posted before, she had 2 huge folders that were my file with her. My exam lasted 20 minutes at most.

Any comments or suggestions?

She states that no further tests are needed.

As I see it, she did not fully review my folder, did not ask my history, automatically took my current career over my explanation that I have had this problem since I was in the service. She did mention that I have had the pain since 1992.

thanks!

jason

I can post any other info from the paperwork I received that might be relavent if I am missing something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Posted Images

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

You need a high class IMO to try and get this thing right. What you lack is contiunual treatment for this problem since discharge. That is how the VA has been able to find all these alternative diagnostic reasons for your problems. If you told them about all these other accidents over the years they will latch onto those accidents as alternative sources for your problems. A good IMO may be able to trace the problem back to your service and account for your increased problems now. This would be the best investment you could make. You need to have your IMO review all your SMR's and other medical records.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that if I am denied by the rating board I will have to go the IMO way.

I actually went though my service records and the "Lumbar Strain" that I was denied SC for originally (again for failure to appear), mentions tenderness around the L4-L5 area and raditing pain down the right leg, 3 days after the incident. Also the XRays from 2000 (the car wreck was in 1998, not immediately before the XRays and chiropractor visits as I thought), show mild degeneration already.

I have also read that there are all kinds of different diagnostic codes...... my back is 5295, lum./sac. strain and as I said, was denied SC in 1995. Should I just consider filing for a deifferent code (DDD/IVD?) and claim that going back to 1993 when the injury is documented, or maybe try to get my code changed? I've seen a few posts on this but as with all of this, I am not too sure what any of it means.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

You have medically documentes DDD, which is another name for IVDS. You most certainly need to file for IVDS. Lumbosacral strain is the VA's way to make it look like you have a temporary injury that will eventually heal in time. It is muscular in nature. You have degenerative changes in the bone and connective tissues of your spine. Consider the problems you are having with your back right now, then magnify them times 100, because that's where you're headed. You are officially a "spiney." Welcome to the club! Let's just hope you don't join the diaper club becuase of it, like myself and so many other have done.

IVDS will open up many more doors becuase it is now medically known what degenerative changes in the spine will do to the nerve roots in your lumbosacral area. The VA won't have as much wiggle room to get out of rating your secondary conditions once they have rated you for IVDS. They will try to fight it, but you have the evidence on your side. Now all you need is a definative nexus. Good Luck!

90%, TDIU P&T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rentalguy, thanks for the upbeat message! I will say that there might be one or two other clubs that I would rather be a member of..... although, I wouldn't join any club that would willingly have me! LOL

Seriously though, I can tell you that the minute the back doc turned the light on on my MRI slides my heart skipped a beat. I have been an EMT for 14 years and it was SO obvious to ME that two of the discs were shot that I pointed at them and said this isn't good,eh? The doc just kinda nodded and said "yeah....".

Anyway, since the C&P confirmed DDD and says that it is due to many factors, if I file a new claim and the VA accepts my nexus to allow SC dhould I have to have another C&P before they can rate me or??????

As for nexus, I can think of a million things that have been bad for my back. Besides running and going on "humps", as we were falling back from an Iraqi tank unit in Kuwait, I backed my Amtrak (tank) into a bunker. We dropped about 10 feet and ended up verticle. Then myself and two other crew members had to break the tank track and repair it while under fire and wearing chemical suits. Just one of the tons of things that I know beat the hell outta me.

Unfortunately, the only thing that is definately back related in my medical record is that injury from playing basketball.

Is there any type of "militarty job related" or "combat waiver" allowance for making that connection to allow SC?

I'm hoping that the diapers never happenbut if they do, let me quote a saying from an old fireman who was known for doing more than his part to keep the firehouse smelling "fresh":

"You'll never be a good farter if you're scared of shittin yourself!"

Thanks again for all of the replies so far!

Jason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I would wait and see what comes out of this round prior to forming a game plan for the future. You need to get a copy of the C&P, and see if it clearly says that it was a exam for IVDS. It is usually posed as a question with the examiner marking a yes or no answer. If they answered no, then when this rating decision is made, you need to start thinking about filing a new claim for IVDS. This will be difficult, because the VARO is going to want to reopen the claim that was denied (if it actually gets denied). Don't get too worked up about, though, just be thinking about new and material evidence. That would mean trying to get at least one good IMO sometime in the next few months. Two would be much better; one from an ortho doc and one from a neurosurgeon.

Don't worry about the diaper club. If you start having a loss of bowel control, then you have a huge problem. For bladder incontinence, though, the VA docs don't seem to want to do much about it. That could be that it's too late in my case. I was too embarrased to say anything for the first year or so, so the damage that has been done is irreversible. If you start dribbling, get to the doctor.

90%, TDIU P&T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

post-3417-1201658017_thumb.jpgYa know, I NEVER even thought of this...... but even without a documented visit to medical, could photographic evidence of a situation that caused trauma be used to help link a condition to service?

I ask because of the attatchment Im including. It is me (with the glasses) after hitting a ship.... yes a ship.... at 30mph with a 26ton Amtrak (tank). I was driving and seated right above where the damage is. This was in 1989. My nickname for the rest of my enlistment was "McCrash" (my last name is McGrath)...........

Just wondering........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
    • karlduerr earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use