Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

90 Day Letter On Its Way From Bva

Rate this question


Josephine

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Here is the latest, I think I have had it!!

Well, I just called the BVA. I was told my claims file left

the legal team

and now I have been mailed a 90 day letter to respond.

What can they possibly do to me now?

I have been at the BVA remanded to AMC for another almost two years

and before I receive the SSOC. The claims examiner calls me to advise

me to waiver my 60 days to submit new evidence to AMC.

She politely walks the file back to BVA.

I secure the IME and I think now it is being

considered as " NEW EVIDENCE".

Doesn't it sound like, I am starting the process again?

I will never live to see the end of this claim.

I may just have to drop the whole darn mess.

I don't know how to fight this thing any longer.

Always,

Betty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Woo Hoo! I'm getting my party dress ready!!! :lol:

Free

Betty

The day you win your claim we are going to throw a Hadit party. You will be a bright and shinning light to all those who are fighting the power.

John King

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
Betty

The day you win your claim we are going to throw a Hadit party. You will be a bright and shinning light to all those who are fighting the power.

John King

John,

I remembered your post about needing another opinion.

I understand I am getting the letter, because the file was walked

over from the AMC to the BVA and then I turn in the IME.

Just to be on the safe side, I took your advice and contacted Dr.

Wilson for another opinion. He is also a Board Certifed Forsensic

Psychiatrist with 30 years experience and the highest credentials,

graduated from Harvard Medical School.

Dr. Crowley graduated from Yale.

I am going in and knock those two nuts off the map.

If they remand and sent it back to those two again, I bet they will

come up with the truth and leave off the appears.

You guys can have a party while I pass out somewhere.

Always Appreciate,

Betty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
Woo Hoo! I'm getting my party dress ready!!! :lol:

Free

Free,

Just don't gain or loose any weight. It may be this time next year and me still going with this claim.

Always the Best to You!

Betty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
Betty

The day you win your claim we are going to throw a Hadit party. You will be a bright and shinning light to all those who are fighting the power.

John King

I won't have to dress up, will I?

90%, TDIU P&T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
I won't have to dress up, will I?

rentalguy,

Just don't purchase your new clothes anytime soon. We may have several changes of seasons before this party, but you will all be invited.

Always Betty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Betty - I'm w/ Free, I don't see how, at this point, they could continue to deny your claim. I'm all for a party, keep us posted. ;-)

Free,

What if a claim comes down to how the VA weighed the evidence? If the courts won't overrule the way the VA weighted the evidence then what recourse does a vet have when they ignore outside evidence in favor or their own (or just ignore their own evidence when it's favorable to the vet)?

I know the VA can "weigh" evidence as it sees fit but can't the vet challenge the way they weighed the evidence (as in, our C&P exam is right and your IMO is wrong) or must you fight the claim on the sheer volume of evidence and the number of reports (as in getting 3 IMOs to the VA's 1 C&P exam)?

Here are your statements that bring up these questions in my mind:

"The Court of Veteran's appeals won't actually re-decide claims. They can decide the law and regulations weren't followed - but they won't retry the facts. So they won't get into the issue of how evidence was weighed. They won't determine that your evidence is more credible than the BVA said it was.

If the BVA denies - and there is ANY evidence to support the denial - the Court won't put the decision aside on THAT basis. (They won't say your evidence was stronger than the evidence the BVA relied on). If there are medical opinions that support the BVA's decision - they will uphold it and not redecide what weight that evidence would have been afforded."

Thanks,

TS Snave

Edited by tssnave
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use