Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Dumb Question I Know But

Rate this question


jessie0054

Question

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

I'm confused about the Life Insurance for service disabled veteran.

Is the first $10,000 free??

Thanks

jessie

Waiver of Premiums for Totally Disabled Veterans

Under certain conditions, the basic S-DVI policy provides for a waiver of premiums in case of total disability. Policyholders who carry the basic S-DVI coverage and who become eligible for a waiver of premiums due to total disability can apply for and be granted additional Supplemental S-DVI of up to $20,000.

Supplemental S-DVI

The Veterans' Benefits Act of 1992, provided for $20,000 of supplemental coverage to S-DVI policyholders. Premiums may not be waived on this supplemental coverage. S-DVI policyholders are eligible for this supplemental coverage if:

  • They are eligible for a waiver of premiums.
  • They apply for the coverage within one year from notice of the grant of waiver.
  • are under age 65

If I am reding this correctly the 1st $10,000.00 would have the premium waived and then you would be eligible to apply for a second amount up to $20,000.00 that you would have to pay for.

Interesting I am reading it to say you can get $30,000.00 total. I never knew that till I looked this up .. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waiver of Premiums for Totally Disabled Veterans

Under certain conditions, the basic S-DVI policy provides for a waiver of premiums in case of total disability. Policyholders who carry the basic S-DVI coverage and who become eligible for a waiver of premiums due to total disability can apply for and be granted additional Supplemental S-DVI of up to $20,000.

Supplemental S-DVI

The Veterans' Benefits Act of 1992, provided for $20,000 of supplemental coverage to S-DVI policyholders. Premiums may not be waived on this supplemental coverage. S-DVI policyholders are eligible for this supplemental coverage if:

  • They are eligible for a waiver of premiums.
  • They apply for the coverage within one year from notice of the grant of waiver.
  • are under age 65

If I am reding this correctly the 1st $10,000.00 would have the premium waived and then you would be eligible to apply for a second amount up to $20,000.00 that you would have to pay for.

Interesting I am reading it to say you can get $30,000.00 total. I never knew that till I looked this up .. lol

Thanks BigDog:

I am trying to apply for the Life Insurance for my son who cannot get life insurance anywhere else do to his haveing 2 differents kinds of rare cancer.

He is rated now at 50% disabled 40% for the cancer and 10% for his back and is only 37.

This insurance stuff is all too confusing!!

Thanks:

Jessie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I got the disabled vet life insurance and the waiver on premiums because I was IU. It was very easy and the VA seemed to have their act together on this one. Big Dog is right. You have to apply within one year of being granted a disability even if it is just 10%. I was already IU when I got an additional 10% for something else so I was able to apply. I wonder if you get an SMC if that is considered a new disability?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure about the SMC thing. I know that you have to apply for the insurance within a year of being granted SC - and any time you get a NEW condition rated you can re-apply. BUT - you have to be in good health EXCEPT for the C condition.

For instance if you get SC for a knee condition, but also have cancer - then they don't have to accept you.

I wish they would open enrollment up for people who are granted SC for conditions after their death.

I will TRY to enroll my husband once I get the SC for cancer. But the decisions at the BVA don't make it look very promising.

They DO allow enrollment after death, IF the vet was incapable of applying BEFORE death.

Say the vet gets SC for something - and he becomes mentally incompetent within one year of getting the SC. They can actually enroll him / her AFTER death because of the incompetance within the one year period making them unable to apply.

You have to SHOW they were mentally incompetent BEFORE death - and that the incompetance kept them from applying - BUT the laws REQUIRE a showing of incompetance AND they don't consider short periods of incompetence right before death to count.

They say that if the vet didn't apply while they WERE competent - they shouldn't get it.

This totally disregards the rights of those who were not granted SC until AFTER death. From what I read - you STILL have to show they were incompetent BEFORE death - which is ridiculous because they could NOT have applied BEFORE death (whether competent or not) if they weren't granted the SC.

By the time my husband was granted SC for other conditions - he already had the cancer (that was NOT Sc'd) He didn't apply for the insurance - however, he wouldn't hav been accepted anyway - because the cancer would have made him NOT in good health (insurable) except for his SC conditions.

Yet, if I get the SC granted for his cancer AFTER his death, according to what I have read - it would be an uphill battle to try to get the life insurance granted AFTER death - because the only mental incompetance I could show was that immediately proceedig his death (and drug induced).

I have read a few cases at the BVA - and it doesn't look promising.

They have left a gap.

To me - if the vet APPLIED for SC BEFORE death - and SC is granted AFTER death - they should not REQUIRE the incompetance - because they weren't allowed to apply because they weren't granted SC yet.

But I guess laws are laws.

The best argument I could make is where the decisions keep saying that they do not consider brief incompetance immediately proceeding death to count - because if the vet did not apply while they were competant - the law wasn't meant to protect them - should not apply in my husband's case - as he was not able to apply while competant because he hadn't been granted SC yet - So that ANY showing of incompetance for ANY amount of time before death should suffice to meet the incompetance standard required by law.

Free

Free

I got the disabled vet life insurance and the waiver on premiums because I was IU. It was very easy and the VA seemed to have their act together on this one. Big Dog is right. You have to apply within one year of being granted a disability even if it is just 10%. I was already IU when I got an additional 10% for something else so I was able to apply. I wonder if you get an SMC if that is considered a new disability?
Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got the disabled vet life insurance and the waiver on premiums because I was IU. It was very easy and the VA seemed to have their act together on this one. Big Dog is right. You have to apply within one year of being granted a disability even if it is just 10%. I was already IU when I got an additional 10% for something else so I was able to apply. I wonder if you get an SMC if that is considered a new disability?

John SMC's do not count. For the basic life (first 10,000) it must be applied for within TWO YEARS of receiving a rating for a new condition. The one year requirement applies to the supplemental amounts which must be applied for within ONE YEAR of receiving a notice that your waiver of premiums has been approved on the basic amount.

Edited by Ricky
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use