Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Agent Orange Outside Vietnam

Rate this question


jamescripps2

Question

  • Answers 23
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

When was AO sprayed at Ft. Drum, i was ther e in 1980-83

There is some information at this web site.

http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/reading_room/T...lHerbicides.pdf

You might also email

jackpot29@msn.com This is Irish, she has more on Fort Drum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was at Fort Benning, GA from 1967 to 1969 and was part of the training forces (early version of OPFOR). We did a lot more than just OPFOR operations and exercises, we also worked with the SERE school. More than once we came into direct contact with heavy concentrations of oil on the water and areas of the swamp and forest that had been defoliated. The exposures to these areas, by our superiors, was very much intentional. The worst of the exposures caused more than one individual in our squad to become sick, including myself; the symptoms were hepatitis like in nature. Over the years I have had one medical problem after another, and am currently battling an agressive case of prostrate cancer; one of the cancers that is on the VA's AO disease list. There are NO KNOWN INSTANCES of prostrate cancer in my immediate family, so I know where the cancer came from, as well as my other internal medical problems.

Veterans continue to pay a heavy price for exposure to toxins, especially Vietnam Era veterans, who are continually being denied service connection for exposure to these deadly toxins.

I am currently looking for statements of collaboration from other Veterans regarding AO exposure (suspected or otherwise) at Fort Benning, GA for the years shown above, and for any DoD information regarding AO use at Fort Benning.

If we are to win what is rightfully ours in the way of service connected benefits we need to start working together, and in so doing we can put the pieces together. I am willing to take this matter as far as possible, and have been fighting the good fight for the last 36 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

What areas of Ft. Benning were exposed to AO. I was there in 1969 for basic with trips to the rifle range etc. I guess it does not matter since I went to Vietnam anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the South part of the post, in the heavily forested and swampy areas where a lot of the training took place. I was stationed at both the main barracks near the jump towers and in the Kelly Hill area. Most of our time was spent in the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use