Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder In Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury And Amnesia For The Event?

Rate this question


Guest allanopie

Question

Guest allanopie

J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1997 Winter;9(1):18-22.

Posttraumatic stress disorder in patients with traumatic brain injury and amnesia for the event?

Warden DL, Labbate LA, Salazar AM, Nelson R, Sheley E, Staudenmeier J, Martin E.

Defense and Veterans Head Injury Program, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC 20307-5001, USA.

Frequency of DSM-III-R posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was studied in 47 active-duty service members (46 male, 1 female; mean age 27 = 7) with moderate traumatic brain injury and neurogenic amnesia for the event. Patients had attained "oriented and cooperative" recovery level. When evaluated with a modified Present State Examination and other questions at various points from study entry to 24-month follow-up, no patients met full criteria for PTSD or met criterion B (reexperience); 6 (13%) met both C (avoidance) and D (arousal) criteria. Five of these 6 also had organic mood disorder, depressed type, and/or organic anxiety disorder. Posttraumatic amnesia following moderate head injury may protect against recurring memories and the development of PTSD. Some patients with neurogenic amnesia may develop a form of PTSD without the reexperiencing symptoms.

Publication Types:

· Clinical Trial

PMID: 9017524 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=9017524

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 29
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

This is BUNK science from the Defense and Veterans Head Injury Program, Walter Reed Army Medical Center. 27 patients for their study. They state "No patients met full criteria for PTSD" AND "Some patients with neurogenic amnesia may develop a form of PTSD without the reexperiencing symptoms." Blatant Contradiction. They are skewing the DSM-111 diagnosis of PTSD - in order to deny compensation for the disorder! If you read related articles, other studies independent of the DoD will state the exact opposite.

See here [israel] : One hundred twenty subjects with mild traumatic brain injury who were hospitalized for observation were assessed immediately after the trauma and followed up 1 week, 3 months, and 6 months later. All participants underwent psychiatric evaluation and self-assessment of their memory of the traumatic event. RESULTS: Overall, 17 (14%) of the participants met full criteria for PTSD at 6 months. Subjects with memory of the traumatic event were significantly more likely to develop PTSD than those without memory of the traumatic event; the difference between the groups resulted primarily from the reexperiencing cluster.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.f...3799&query_hl=2

See here [Germany]: The development of symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in patients with neurogenic amnesia for the traumatic event is recorded. With a single exception, all patients were accident victims with closed head injuries. Only about three quarters of the patients completely fulfilled DSM-III-R criteria of PTSD. Nineteen patients displayed involuntary conscious memories of aspects of the traumatic event (presenting as recurrent intrusive thoughts, images or dreams) co-existent with a complete or partial lack of voluntary conscious memories of the trauma, suggesting that different memory systems and distinct brain mechanisms subserve these phenomena.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.f...3682&query_hl=2

See here [scotland]: METHOD: Fifteen hundred case records from an Accident and Emergency Unit were screened to identify 371 individuals with traumatic brain injury who were sent questionnaires by post. The 53 subsequent valid responses yielded three groups: those with no memory (n = 14), untraumatic memories (n = 13) and traumatic memories (n = 26) of the index event. RESULTS: Groups with no memories or traumatic memories of the index event reported higher levels of psychological distress than the group with untraumatic memories. Ratings of PTSD symptoms were less severe in the no memory groups compared to those with traumatic memories. CONCLUSIONS: Psychological distress was associated with having traumatic or no memories of an index event. Amnesia for the event did not protect against PTSD; however, it does appear to protect against the severity and presence of specific intrusive symptoms.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.f...6346&query_hl=2

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

There is a horrific number of TBI's (traumatic brain injuries), veterans returning from the Iraq war. The TBI is probably the signature of Iraq's combat wounded; perhaps even as high as 60%.

"Diagnosis can be difficult even when head injury is apparent or the patient is able to describe a concussive head injury to their doctors. Even mild brain injury can cause depression, reduced cognitive functioning, nausea, sleep disturbance, erratic behavior, and violent mood swings. These disabilities are exacerbated by misdiagnosis, lack of treatment, the public¹s perceptions of brain injury and mental illness. For brain injured veterans, the lack of physical signs and the diffuse nature of symptoms is often met with skepticism, considered to be psychological, or worse, malingering." http://www.tf.org/tf/featured/01-29-04traumaticinjury.html

Although PTSD may very well be the LEAST of their organic problems, the diagnosis - more often than not - applies and deserves service-connected disability compensation.

See also: New England Journal of Medicie, Volume 352:2043-2047 May 19, 2005 Number 20. Traumatic Brain Injury in the War Zone, Susan Okie, M.D. http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/352/20/2043

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Diagnosis can be difficult even when head injury is apparent or the patient is able to describe a concussive head injury to their doctors. Even mild brain injury can cause depression, reduced cognitive functioning, nausea, sleep disturbance, erratic behavior, and violent mood swings. These disabilities are exacerbated by misdiagnosis, lack of treatment, the public¹s perceptions of brain injury and mental illness. For brain injured veterans, the lack of physical signs and the diffuse nature of symptoms is often met with skepticism, considered to be psychological, or worse, malingering." http://www.tf.org/tf/featured/01-29-04traumaticinjury.html

I am one of these from the first gulf war. I was hospitalized for several weeks for a closed head injury in '91. I returned to duty and fought in the ground assault. For 14 yrs I've been complaining of problems and even a draining feeling in my ear. I was put on anti-depressants. I told everyone I had a head injury. I was put on anti-depressants. Last Jan. at a C&P for depression secondary to SC undiagnosed fatigue (a symtom of brain injury) the examing Psych said it was my brain damage causing it all. It turns out that the draining feeling in my right ear is ceribral spinal fluid leaking from my brain. I had filed a claim in '97 for right ear disorder that was denied because there was nothing wrong with it. Oh, I better quit here. I could go on for a while. Better to just swallow a little more of my brain fluid and relax. Oh, the way they VA distiguishes between Mild Brain Trauma and PTSD for diagnostic purposes is simply avoidance of the event/stressor. Otherwize symptoms are the same.

Time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
I am one of these from the first gulf war. I was hospitalized for several weeks for a closed head injury in '91. I returned to duty and fought in the ground assault. For 14 yrs I've been complaining of problems and even a draining feeling in my ear. I was put on anti-depressants. I told everyone I had a head injury. I was put on anti-depressants. Last Jan. at a C&P for depression secondary to SC undiagnosed fatigue (a symtom of brain injury) the examing Psych said it was my brain damage causing it all. It turns out that the draining feeling in my right ear is ceribral spinal fluid leaking from my brain. I had filed a claim in '97 for right ear disorder that was denied because there was nothing wrong with it. Oh, I better quit here. I could go on for a while. Better to just swallow a little more of my brain fluid and relax. Oh, the way they VA distiguishes between Mild Brain Trauma and PTSD for diagnostic purposes is simply avoidance of the event/stressor. Otherwize symptoms are the same.

Time

Time, I am sorry for your combat injury and feel outraged with the VA's inadaquate medical attention! I hope you have since filed a proper claim for the closed head injury? Yes? Your recent C&P Examiner's report seems helpful!! Hope that you get the help you need and desrve.

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I posted a topic in the "medication" section awhile back on a similar topic - Propanolol ....It has been shown that disrupting the memory BEFORE PTSD sets in can reduce PTSD symptoms. This doesn't mean there's a cure, nor does it mean that it is guaranteed to work, but having the VA focus on helping future vets to have lesser symptomology is better then having them focus on "curing" PTSD after the fact (IE - lowering existing ratings).

Honestly, I think the VA should embrace the study I linked because it refutes the fact that amnesia can stop PTSD AND can help future vets by decreasing symptoms on the battle field before it becomes a life-long problem.

Edited by Jay Johnson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use