Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

One Claim In, Other Needs Done, Advice?

Rate this question


cowgirl

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Just wonderin'.

I have a iu claim in and c&p to be done, but I need to service connect other issues. These are orthotic, becoming more painful&problematic and new footwear I need costs alot. Other ailments include knees and back, though sc connected, I believe they truly are worsening because of the feet.

Thank you for your thoughts

cg.

For my children, my God sent husband and my Hadit family of veterans, I carry on.

God Bless A m e r i c a, Her Veterans and their Families!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

What kind of feet problems are you having? Are you sure they are getting worse because of your feet? I guess it could be a which came first thing. Is it possible the knee and back problems aren't causing your feet problems? Just wondering - because then the feet would be secondary SC. --They are all interconnected and can affect each other.

http://www.hss.edu/newsroom_11280.asp

Avoid Running into Trouble: Orthotics Can Cause Problems if Improperly Prescribed

New York, NY—July 1, 1999

Orthotics, or orthopedic shoe inserts, can be useful devices. But if improperly prescribed they can lead to pain and discomfort, and even cause serious injury, warns Rock Positano, DPM, a foot and ankle specialist at Hospital for Special Surgery. Dr. Positano cites the case of a patient whose mail-order orthotics resulted in a broken bone in each foot. The patient thought the devices would provide support for his running. They landed him in Dr. Positano’s office instead.

"Orthotics are like prescription drugs," Dr. Positano explains. "When indicated and prescribed correctly, they are beneficial to the user. When unnecessary or prescribed incorrectly, they can be dangerous." Some over-the-counter orthotics may exacerbate pre-existing medical conditions, Dr. Positano says. Those at particular risk are people with heel pain, achilles tendon pain, back or knee problems, or those who have a high arch foot type or flat feet. Exercise enthusiasts who engage in high impact or high velocity sports often buy orthotics to provide support or serve as shock absorbers. That, too, can spell trouble.

Orthotics are not used to correct foot and ankle problems. Health care professionals prescribe them to stabilize a joint, reduce pain, prevent deformity, provide better positioning or improve the biomechanical function of the foot, according to Dr. Positano. They work by removing pressure and stress from painful areas in the foot and ankle. Custom orthotics, which may also be useful in alleviating knee, hip and lower back pain, should not be confused with the prefabricated models found in shoe stores, ski and skate shops, pharmacies and sporting goods stores, Dr. Positano advises. There is a tremendous difference in quality and effectiveness.

"Orthotics alter the way a person walks, stands and absorbs shock from the ground," he says. "Anyone wishing to use them should have a good reason and be sure to consult a professional with the proper training and credentials, such as a podiatrist." He or she will ask about any medical problems or pain the person may have. The health professional will also consider gait analysis, orthopedic issues, level of activity, the type of activity, foot type, and biomechanics, which refers to ankle, knee and hip movement. X-rays may be taken, as well.

When prescribed responsibly and used correctly, orthotics can be extremely helpful. It’s important for patients to follow the doctor’s instructions on when to wear them to obtain the greatest benefit, according to Dr. Positano.

Just wonderin'.

I have a iu claim in and c&p to be done, but I need to service connect other issues. These are orthotic, becoming more painful&problematic and new footwear I need costs alot. Other ailments include knees and back, though sc connected, I believe they truly are worsening because of the feet.

Thank you for your thoughts

cg.

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

CG...wait for the IU claim to wrap up first, otherwise you will be tacking a lot of time on to a claim that could be wrapped up quickly. After the dust settles, then file for the feet as secondary to the SC'd knee and back problems, and simultaneously file for an increase on those two as well.

90%, TDIU P&T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Thanks free and rental, things are getting progressively worse in the feet department, so I've been getting concerned. Rental, I will post again when time comes closer for me to submit the claim. I want to keep things in the correct order, had knee issue, then feet/ankles, then back. So, I will wait the claim out for just now.

Thanks again,

cg

For my children, my God sent husband and my Hadit family of veterans, I carry on.

God Bless A m e r i c a, Her Veterans and their Families!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would think they would / could be all inter-related. And if the back and knee are already granted SC, then it might be easier to get the feet & ankles SC as secondary - as long as a doctor says it is as likely as not that the knee and back problems could have caused the foot problems.

Free

Thanks free and rental, things are getting progressively worse in the feet department, so I've been getting concerned. Rental, I will post again when time comes closer for me to submit the claim. I want to keep things in the correct order, had knee issue, then feet/ankles, then back. So, I will wait the claim out for just now.

Thanks again,

cg

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use