Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Iris To Finance

Rate this question


free_spirit_etc

Question

I previously submitted a claim to be allowed to keep my husband's month of death payment. Upon receipt of my husband's C-file, I found that a transmittal form was sent to Finance Operations on 6-28-2007 that states "Surviving Spouse entitled to one time payment of amt of comp or pen received by veteran at time of death. Remove overpayment (08E Transaction) if payment is not returned. 38 CFR 3.20©"

However, these funds were reclaimed from my checking account in August 2007.As these funds were taken out of my bank account 2 months after the overpayment transaction was supposed to be removed, what is the procedure for being repaid the funds that were taken from my account in error? Thank you,XXX

Mrs. xxxx:

I will forward your inquiry on for processing.

Sincerely,

Matthew xxx

Thank you very much Matthew! I appreciate your promptness and thank you for helping the vets and us widows! If I get to the Pearly Gates before you do - I'll put in a good word for you! :)xxxx

Ms. xxx:I am happy to be of service! You will receive a response in them mail to your inquiry.(PS - I hope you don't have to visit those gates for a very long time!):)Matthew xxx

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Free,

It was disgraceful the VA did this to you!

I would like to smack them for you.

I appreciate Matthew stepping in to help you.

How is your husbands claim coming?

I know you stay so busy helping others like myself.

What would I do without Free and the Box.

Actually when I started thinking outside of it, things seem to fall

into place.

I should post that I received my retro.

I will do this right now.

Thanks so much, My " Dear Friend".

Always,

Betty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gee -I thought they paid you that by now!

I got an Iris response in less then one hour this AM-

from the VSM herself.

Sometimes it takes them days to respond- at least my claims are still with the DRO and not in the PAP stack yet (Paper air plane stack)

and although I signed POA form for an attorney some time ago-on my CUE claims-with the DRO - nothing appears changed on my POA.

I am glad I checked.I have not heard from this attorney -no call back and no email replies-

from our first conversation and her receipt of my POA fee agreement.

It is good news in a way because I dont want them to copy the medical records yet for her-----

too many other things are in the wind regarding my situation-

I dont know why an attorney would even need Rods SSA and VA med recs for my CUE claims.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really need to start pulling things together for my VA claim. I have only worked on it here and there. But I have been trying to get a copy of the C-file for a year and just got it last week.

My one-year deadline for submitting evidence and having my claim readjudicated ends June 7 - a year since getting my notice of what they need.

I can have everything else pulled together EXCEPT the IMO. I asked for an extension of time on the deadline. I mean c'mon - it takes them a year to send me the C-file - and then I am supposed to pull it all together in two weeks.

I guess I could have gotten an IMO without it. BUT I also don't want to spend that much money on an IMO only to have them discredit it because the doctor didn't have access to the C-file (that THEY didn't send).

As the basis of my husband's claim is post-service diagnosis of cancer - and as lung cancer is pretty much asymptomatic until late stages (and the fact that my husband had NO symptoms when it was detected - unless you count fatigue) the SMR's aren't that relevant. But still - the VA wants the IMO to say they LOOKED at the SMR's.

I asked for an extension of time - and kept getting answers to everything BUT that - so I kept asking until I finally got a response acknowledging that I had asked for it. However, the response said they sent it on to someone who will check the regulations and see if I can get an extension.

I probably won't hear from them until AFTER the deadline.

So I guess I will send everything in - once again ask for an extension on the IMO with my submission - IRIS them 20 more times - send in the IMO when I get it - ask that my claim be readjudicated when I send it - IRIS them some more.

Heck! The two most important papers I needed were:

1. His discharge physical.

2. The latest VA Medical Opinion that was used to deny my claim.

His discharge physical has mysteriously disappeared from his file.

The copy of the VA Medical Opinon has NO date and NO signature - but DOES say OVER at the bottom - BUT they did NOT send me the second page.

It is merely a hand written note on a "Report of Contact" form. VERY unprofessional.

It just says that he was out of the one year presumptive period when the cancer was diagnosed - and that the symptoms in the SMRS were from viral infections and not related to the cancer.

No sh**&*&

We already KNEW that.

The doctor did NOT address whether it was more likely than not that his cancer started in service - which has been the BASIS of his claim from the BEGINNING.

But they dance all around the issue - because they know they can't actually say it is more likley than not that it started AFTER service.

Actually, the VA didn't even ask him to address that. The VA only asked him to review the inservice symptoms to see if they were related to cancer.

You can tell how well they read all the medical documents that show that cancer is most likely asymptomatic until late stages, and his medical notes indicating HE was asymptomatic all along.

Heck! If the very nature of the disease is that it HAS NO symptoms - then what are they playing around with the symptom game for?

It runs contrary to the KNOWN NATURE of the disease.

To require someone to have symptoms for a disease that is asymptomatic - to prove they had it - runs contrary to medically established standards.

But I am not going to question their medical opinion as "invalid." Becaushe their opinion doesn't actually HURT my claim - at least at the BVA level.

If they take their opinion that my husband had no symptoms in service OVER my IMO's opinion that his cancer STARTED in service - THEN I will address it in a NOD.

And I think the claim should fly at the BVA - unless they remand it.

The question is - when did it start. The BVA has awarded lots of cancer claims on the theory that slow growing cancer didn't pop up over night - the rate my husband's cancer would have had to have grown to have reached the size it did in the short time before it was diagnosed post service is outside the realm of medical probability - and the VA - with all their dancing - have never bothered to get an opinion that REFUTES what my IMO will say.

So I would hope the BVA would grant it. But they could also remand it - and ask for a VA or outside opinion on the issue of the start date. I don't look for them to do that though. We have submitted so much treatesy info from extremely reputable sources (National Cancer Institute, Major Universities, etc.) to back our position - that I would hope the BVA would realize that the only way a doctor could refute our position would be to argue a point that is not in line with medically established standards.

But so far - I have been so busy with Social Security - who have been particularly evil - that I haven't had as much time to work on the VA claim as I need.

Free

Free,

It was disgraceful the VA did this to you!

I would like to smack them for you.

I appreciate Matthew stepping in to help you.

How is your husbands claim coming?

I know you stay so busy helping others like myself.

What would I do without Free and the Box.

Actually when I started thinking outside of it, things seem to fall

into place.

I should post that I received my retro.

I will do this right now.

Thanks so much, My " Dear Friend".

Always,

Betty

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope. They haven't paid it. On the phone they told me they could block the reclaimation - then they told me they would take it back and issue me a check.

On the IRIS - they told me their was no evidence I was his widow (which explains why I have sent them multiple copies of the wedding license) - And geez - You would think that if they consider the Death Certificate to be credible evidence that he died - they could also look at the spot that names ME as his widow - and think that it is more likely than not that the person named as the widow on a death certificate stands a good chance of being the widow.

Anyway - then they told me they couldn't stop the process of the money being reclaimed - and made no offer to send me a check.

Oddly enough - after them having a HOLD on the money - where it was still in my account - but I couldn't USE it - for five or six months after my husband's death- I finally IRISed them and aked them to either RELEASE the hold on the money OR take the dang thing! It ticked me off every time I looked at my bank account and saw I had access to $225 LESS than what was IN my account because the VA still had a hold on it.

But they responded they couldn't do anything about it.

It was not until I got the C-file and saw they had actually put in a trasmittal to reverse the overcharge and NOT take it back in June - that I could try to do anything about them taking the money back in August.

I also have an IRIS in asking about my burial expense claim.

That has been all messed up too. I had his father file a claim for Plot allowance and I filed the claim for burial expenses ($300 EACH claim).

He filled out the section labled PLOT ALLOWANCE ONLY - so they even acknowledge on the FORM that someone might claim that separately - which is why I had him fill out a separate claim - as he purchased the plot (he wanted him to be buried in the same cemetary as his mother and brother).

I put on MY claim - under the section that ASKS if there will be any other claims - that HIS FATHER - And named him by name - would be filing a claim for PLOT ALLOWANCE ONLY!

They DENIED his claim - because they said their records show that the funeral expenses were paid by ME.

They sent him a waiver for ME to sign in order for him to be paid. But the waiver was a FULL waiver - meant to be completed by a creditor. It says that NO bills are due and owed and I WAIVE my right to be paid.

I IRISed them - Asked why I have to waive my right to the $300 burial allowance for his father to be paid the $300 plot allowance.

They said we EACH have to sign a waiver for the other one to be paid. But the forms they sent don't give us the option to do anything but waive the right to be paid at all.

The forms also said "I certify that the amounts in section whatever are true." and I was supposed to sign it - but they didn't send a copy of section whatever that I was supposed to be certifying was true.

So I did not sign the waiver - but wrote all over the form that I was waiving the right to be paid PLOT ALLOWANCE - I was asking to be paid BURIAL allowance.

And I sent a letter explaining the situation - and indicating that I could not sign a form certifying things to be true that I didn't know to be true (because they weren't included on the form) and I was NOT a creditor, and was was waiving my right to plot allowance only.

Geez...if it is so hard for them to figure that out - WHY does the FORM itself make it where those two items can be claimed separately by two separate people - even having a space where you LIST the OTHER person who will be claiming the OTHER part.

Anyway - I haven't heard squat since the January 2008 letter telling me they are working on the claim.

In the C-file there is an email where they were LOOKING for the burial claim - asking if anyone had seen it.

Then there is a letter to my father-in-law dated November 2007 - telling him they lost his claim and asking him to re-send it. I need to get ahold of him to see if he did.

I sent an IRIS the other day asking for a update for the status of my burial claim.

Maybe they are holding off until they can scrape $300 together. I don't know.

As far as your POA - doesn't it just tick you off when the people that are supposed to be helping you spend more time getting in the way than they do helping?

I used to have a daily prayer - "God, please protect me from those who are looking out for my best interests."

Those are the people who can really mess you up. Sometimes I find it easier to deal with sworn enemies - At least you know where you stand with them - and they aren't in there messing things up "for your own good."

Free

Gee -I thought they paid you that by now!

I got an Iris response in less then one hour this AM-

from the VSM herself.

Sometimes it takes them days to respond- at least my claims are still with the DRO and not in the PAP stack yet (Paper air plane stack)

and although I signed POA form for an attorney some time ago-on my CUE claims-with the DRO - nothing appears changed on my POA.

I am glad I checked.I have not heard from this attorney -no call back and no email replies-

from our first conversation and her receipt of my POA fee agreement.

It is good news in a way because I dont want them to copy the medical records yet for her-----

too many other things are in the wind regarding my situation-

I dont know why an attorney would even need Rods SSA and VA med recs for my CUE claims.

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use