Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Diagnosis Change Or Not

Rate this question


Rockhound

Question

Veteran has a current sleep apnea diagnosis supported by a sleep study. Veteran submits a claim for sleep apnea and was scheduled for a C&P examination;

The results of the examination are as follows The VA examiner states, at this time my prefered opinion is that Veterans represents as having Nocturnal Hypoxia and based on the history given, it would be difficult for this examiner to fully support a diagnosis of sleep apnea.

The VA Adjudicator then denies claim stating that a diagnosis change was made and that the Nocturnal Hypoxia was the correct alternative diagnosis.

thus a claim for sleep apnea is declined, since the correct diagnosis was for Nocturnal Hypoxia and veteran's medical hystory is mute on this issue.

Is this a change in a diagnosis and/or was it properly changed?

Yea it's a twist on my claim, but some people just don't get it.

Are you a paranoid schizophrenic

if the ones you think are out to

get you, really are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

To me, it seems very strange that a C&P examination could reverse a diagnosis of sleep apnea that was made after a sleep study.

If the vet had a sleep study done to diagnose the sleep apnea - what basis did the C&P examiner use to change that diagnosis.

I see that chronic episodic hypoxia can mimic apnea...

But wouldn't the vet have the same basis for the claim of a sleep disorder, regardless of whether the C&P doctor wanted to call it something different? The symptoms the vet experiences would be pretty similar.

Free

Veteran has a current sleep apnea diagnosis supported by a sleep study. Veteran submits a claim for sleep apnea and was scheduled for a C&P examination;

The results of the examination are as follows The VA examiner states, at this time my prefered opinion is that Veterans represents as having Nocturnal Hypoxia and based on the history given, it would be difficult for this examiner to fully support a diagnosis of sleep apnea.

The VA Adjudicator then denies claim stating that a diagnosis change was made and that the Nocturnal Hypoxia was the correct alternative diagnosis.

thus a claim for sleep apnea is declined, since the correct diagnosis was for Nocturnal Hypoxia and veteran's medical hystory is mute on this issue.

Is this a change in a diagnosis and/or was it properly changed?

Yea it's a twist on my claim, but some people just don't get it.

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

This examiner could be twisting words knowing that he could save the govt. the $$ by getting the diagnosis change. Doctors can be more corrupt than anybody else. They are the experts and they can twist the words.

What does he mean "based on the history given"? He needs to re-state the history for the record to make sure he is not mis-intrepeting the history given. Then he throws in the "fully" supported. What does this mean? You have partial sleap apnea. This is smoke blowing if I have ever heard it.

If you were in a civil action I guarantee you that your attorney would not let a doctor get by without re-stating the history given. Also, an explanation of the difference between a fully supported diagnosis and an not fully supported diagnosis is in order. Is there a list of criteria as in the DSM where you need to meet 4 of the 5 criteria for sleep apnea or is this doctor just making things up in his head.

At this time I think his statement is to vague to determine anything. It is your responsibility to get the nmedical evidence. The VA scheduled the exam and they will go with this BS until you get it clarified. You could argue this with the RO and try to get a new C&P to get it clarified. If it were me I would be talking to a specialist at the local VA or a private doctor. If the new doctor thought this was bogus then get a statement from the new doc.

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a difference between the 2.

Sleep apnea means you stop breathing.

Nocturnal hypoxia means your not breathing enough or deep enough but your still breathing. You oxygen saturations are low.

I would look at the sleep study result and see what your oxygen levels were, how low did they go and how many times it occurred.

Ruby

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish there was more response but now, change things a bit.

Veteran has a current mental disorder diagnosis supported by a multitude of nuropsychological test, exam, and observation over a three month period, during service. Veteran submits a claim for the mental disorder and was scheduled for a C&P examination;

The results of the examination are as follows The VA examiner states, at this time my prefered opinion is that Veterans represents as having a Personality Disorder and based on the history given, it would be difficult for this examiner to fully support a diagnosis of mental disorder.

The VA Adjudicator then denies claim stating that a diagnosis change was made and that the Personality Disorder was the correct alternative diagnosis.

thus a claim for a Mental Disorder is declined, since the correct diagnosis was a Personality Disorder and since it is a developmental disorder and not a disability for compensation purposes.

Now what do you say?

RR B)

Are you a paranoid schizophrenic

if the ones you think are out to

get you, really are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

they are not even prescibing the vaseline for the screwing over they are giving you, what RO are you in? I want to make sure my claims never go there

100% SC P&T PTSD 100% CAD 10% Hypertension and A&A = SMC L, SSD
a disabled American veteran certified lol
"A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

they are not even prescibing the vaseline for the screwing over they are giving you, what RO are you in? I want to make sure my claims never go there

I would say that you need not worry, since this is an exercise to see how the average person would look at the claim. However, the later presentation was based on my actual claim and even after 30 plus years, the same VARO insists on denying the claim based on the same flawed reasons they gave 30 plus years ago.

If you must know, it is the Nevada Office of Veterans Services, Reno Nevada. I would be tempted to seek out a more favorable VARO, but the VA Health System here is probably as good as it gets and I have few complaints of their care and treatment. My only bone of contention is that since I use them as my only source of medical care and treatment, why then can't I use them like I would an IMO and why are they provented from giving me a nexus letter, even if I can provide them with the same medical records that are a part of my C-File and necessary for such a opinion?

RR B)

Are you a paranoid schizophrenic

if the ones you think are out to

get you, really are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use