Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Filing A Cliam Under 38 Usc 1151

Rate this question


Bound4heaven

Question

Greetings,

When a claim is filed under this section what is the compensation under this law? I mean there is not a ratings guide for this section. Can anyone help? or is there anyone who or known anyone who has filed under section 1151 concerning side effects from meds and the lack of the VA not checking the meds for interactions and this resulting of serious side effects?. I appriciate the comments from Berta. Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

It is hard to know how they would rate the side affects of the wrong medication- it depends on how much actual additional disability the vet got from the wrong med-

Say VA gives a vet a medication that could cause ventricular fibrillation

if not monitored properly- then say the vet- with no other reason for heart problems, ends up in ER with heart attack-

If the VA agrees that they messed up- they would have to rate this- under heart diseases-

if minimal damage was done to the heart and the work could return to work it could get maybe a 30 % rating-

They use the same rating schedule as regular comp.

in my husband's case-there were numerous misdiagnosed conditions.

I insisted, when I discovered he had heart disease and they never treated it- that the sudafed they gave him- 4 times a day had to have had an affect on his heart-they denied me on this many times with VA IMOs-

then I found he had sinus xrays taken by VA-that were clear and yet they continued this med for 6 years-

VACO medical team in 1997 found that sudafed was one of "multiple" deviations of standard medical care and that this continuous medication and dosage in spite of clear sinuses -had certainly contributed to the veteran's death as it raised his blood pressure which the VA also had poorly controlled and had undermedicated.

This DIC 1151 award I get is for 100% Sec 1151 death.

If Rod had lived (it was his section 1151 originally) he would have been rated 100% CVA, under 1151, 100% CAD under 1151 , -(I await the DMII AO claim results) dont know how that would be part would be rated, plus his 100% SC PTSD and then SMC under 1151 which they haven't paid for yet-I think for two years it should be at the R-1 level.It was well above SMC S level.

The additional disability- from 1151 is what they rate just like any other direct SC disability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Greetings,

When a claim is filed under this section what is the compensation under this law? I mean there is not a ratings guide for this section. Can anyone help? or is there anyone who or known anyone who has filed under section 1151 concerning side effects from meds and the lack of the VA not checking the meds for interactions and this resulting of serious side effects?. I appriciate the comments from Berta. Thank you.

I filed a 1151 claim for side effects from my meds. I suffered a severe GI bleed, also a watershed effect of the cervical cord (stroke) which left me with numbness, pain and weakness. Both arms have major problems. So, I won my claim. 10% for each arm.. $374 per month. I lost my rural carriers job at the P.O. which paid $4300 per month. I met with my S.O. yesterday, we are appealing and going after more claims on this. My doctors won't sign a release to return to work so I did file for SSDI which I got on the first try, Disability retirement which I'm waiting for and I get a total of 50% so TDIU isn't in right now. I'm taking a beating but I will work on it. 10-04-06 it will be 2 years since the episode, if they feel I am getting what I should get, I have til that date for the tort claim which I don't care to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • In Memoriam

To be eligible for section 1151 benefits, you need to show two things:

· That there is additional disability not anticipated as a

result of treatment; and

· That the additional disability results from negligence upon the part of VAMC healthworkers

You receive an 1151 award from the court and/or from the VA, but if you go for dual compensation, your VA award will be reduced until you pay off the federal government from any tort award.

Consult a good lawyer to determine where you come out best.

Alex

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ShrekTheTank went up a rank
      Contributor
    • kidva went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use