Yesterday I received BVA decision to formally remand my claim- the initial informal remand for additional development was 2 years ago-and although the VARO said this was with a DRO again- for 3rd time-
this is the order from the BVA to get off the pot.
I was thrilled- this is the FIRST time the VA has referred specifically to 3 IMOs I have-regarding the right claim- my AO death claim-
the BVA said my assessment to have the claim remanded was correct and they also stated:
"The evidende is neither cummulative nor redundant of the evidence already of record. The evidence is material in that it addresses the unestablished fact of a nexus between service or a service related disease and the cardiovascular disease, which all acknowledge lead directly to the veteran's death."
BUT they want another VA IMO- the last one was deficient.
I am getting another IMO myself- just in case.
And also raising Mariano again-
I am happy that finally after all these years the BVA has proven to me they can READ-which I already knew- and they named both the IMO doctors-in initials whoich means they gave credence to the freebee I got from a former VA doctor.
The decision mentions the extraordinary circumstances I went thru (that are in my OGC complaint)in 2005 in parsed words-
I wonder if they got the OGC complaint yet-they need it regarding my other matter before the BVA-
the motion from my POA to dump me-
Maybe I sound nuts that all I got was a validation of my IMOs.
But after all these years, this was certainly a Big step towards a final resolve.
It also makes the rep look VERY bad-as he never presented the IMos that day to the DRO and told me he did-(in 2005)
their former director even stated to me (along with other POA lackys) in email-and I used it as evidence for the GC-
that VA medical people had reviewed my IMOs- it was a LIE and this BVA decision is more proof of that lie!
The BVA not only had the SSOC but also something else in the file that indicated the DRO didnt have the initial 2 IMOs or that they were even discussed with my POA rep-as he said they were and that the DRO had---- well this part is too unbelievable for words- but I told the IG what he said she said -----
I have been given opportunity to send in even more evidence and will do that-I still have plenty more-
and am quite willing to be patient as I wait for my husband to get Peace with Honor-I dont care if they fight over the retro.
Question
Berta
Yesterday I received BVA decision to formally remand my claim- the initial informal remand for additional development was 2 years ago-and although the VARO said this was with a DRO again- for 3rd time-
this is the order from the BVA to get off the pot.
I was thrilled- this is the FIRST time the VA has referred specifically to 3 IMOs I have-regarding the right claim- my AO death claim-
the BVA said my assessment to have the claim remanded was correct and they also stated:
"The evidende is neither cummulative nor redundant of the evidence already of record. The evidence is material in that it addresses the unestablished fact of a nexus between service or a service related disease and the cardiovascular disease, which all acknowledge lead directly to the veteran's death."
BUT they want another VA IMO- the last one was deficient.
I am getting another IMO myself- just in case.
And also raising Mariano again-
I am happy that finally after all these years the BVA has proven to me they can READ-which I already knew- and they named both the IMO doctors-in initials whoich means they gave credence to the freebee I got from a former VA doctor.
The decision mentions the extraordinary circumstances I went thru (that are in my OGC complaint)in 2005 in parsed words-
I wonder if they got the OGC complaint yet-they need it regarding my other matter before the BVA-
the motion from my POA to dump me-
Maybe I sound nuts that all I got was a validation of my IMOs.
But after all these years, this was certainly a Big step towards a final resolve.
It also makes the rep look VERY bad-as he never presented the IMos that day to the DRO and told me he did-(in 2005)
their former director even stated to me (along with other POA lackys) in email-and I used it as evidence for the GC-
that VA medical people had reviewed my IMOs- it was a LIE and this BVA decision is more proof of that lie!
The BVA not only had the SSOC but also something else in the file that indicated the DRO didnt have the initial 2 IMOs or that they were even discussed with my POA rep-as he said they were and that the DRO had---- well this part is too unbelievable for words- but I told the IG what he said she said -----
I have been given opportunity to send in even more evidence and will do that-I still have plenty more-
and am quite willing to be patient as I wait for my husband to get Peace with Honor-I dont care if they fight over the retro.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
3
2
1
1
Popular Days
Sep 22
4
Sep 19
3
Sep 18
2
Sep 20
1
Top Posters For This Question
Berta 3 posts
Angela 2 posts
carlie 1 post
cowgirl 1 post
Popular Days
Sep 22 2008
4 posts
Sep 19 2008
3 posts
Sep 18 2008
2 posts
Sep 20 2008
1 post
10 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now