Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Board Appeal

Rate this question


vaf

Question

Hi, quick question. A veteran received a denial, asked for a de novo review, and was denied again. Does he have 12 months from the original denial date, or 12 months from the de novo review denial decision, to appeal to the Board?

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

I think the statement the BVA put into my recent formal remand might help you-

Appeal deadlines are nothing to overlook-

but circumstances can alter the appeal deadline date.

My AO claim was denied by a Feb 2004 rating decision.

"Although the appellant is already entitled to benefits "as if" service connected for the cause of the veteran's death under 38 USCS 1151 there are a number of ancillary benefits to which she would not be entitled absent a finding of actual service connected death: hence there has been no full grant of the benefit sought."

(a prior BVA decision to me states the exact five figure award amount of one of those benefits)

"The claimant perfected her appeal with regard to service connection for the cause of death by filing correspondence accepted in lieu of a VA Form 9,in January 2006."

(I filed formal appeal within 60 days of the 2nd DRO decision but my vet rep somehow got the VSM to accept something else)

This is what I mean:

"Although this was outside the one year period from the February 2004 denial,and beyond the 60 day period from issuance of a SOC -in September 2005 the claimant submitted or caused to be created additional evidence requiring the issuance of a supplemental statement of the case SSOC in December 2005. The time for perfection of the appeal was therefore extended." 38 CFR 20.302.(:P (2)Sept.2008

(In September 2005 I asked the VSM to CUE to initial DRO decision and it was cued)

I did this in the late 1990s too-

not stuff for the feight of heart-

Unless you can provide very significant new medical evidence (which still might well not have any bearing at all on the appeal deadline) -or prove they committed CUE as I did-with legal evidence to support that charge-as my IMO evidence still remained unacknowledged at this point-

then you must perfect the formal I-9 Appeal 60 days after the issuance of the SOC (Statement of the Case) or within one year from the initial VA denial.

I absolutely do not recommend anyone doing what I did.

This gets into the fine techniques of the legalise of VA case law.

and of course knowing CUE regs in and out-

But your question made me post it all here as this could apply to someone out there-

Also read the DRO's job description that I have posted here at hadit.

I charged and won CUE because the DRO did not follow the M21-1 job description thus legal error was created on the VA's part and they had to do something quick.

They cued the older DRO decision in less than 2 weeks.Maybe it took a few days I forget-but I knew I was right.

Your appeal deadline should be clearly spelled out in the SOC.

M21-1 and the regs in 38 CFR are the best weapons we have to combat the VA with-along with Medical evidence.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

VAF

Did you get a personal hearing or just a review? I would ask for a personal hearing with the DRO. If that does not work then go to the BVA. As long as you getting approved for a DRO Hearing then your BVA time limit is is a state of suspended animation as far as I know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use