Jump to content

Sponsored Ads



  • Latest Donations

  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
Sign in to follow this  
Wings

Injuries, Illnesses Take More Soldiers From Battlefields Than Enemy Fire

Recommended Posts

Posted on Wed, Jan. 04, 2006

Injuries, illnesses take more soldiers from battlefields than enemy fire

BY DREW BROWN

Knight Ridder Newspapers

WASHINGTON - Enemy bombs are the biggest killer of American troops in Iraq, but the United States has lost more men and women to illnesses and noncombat injuries than it has to enemy fire.

Despite advances in technology, top-notch training and equipment, state-of-the-art medical care and a 2003 order by Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld to cut the number of preventable accidents in half, broken bones and bad health have taken more U.S. soldiers off the battlefield than combat has.

By mid-December, more than 25,803 American service members had been evacuated from Iraq since the war began nearly three years ago, according to Pentagon officials. Nearly 80 percent of them were shipped out because of routine illnesses and injuries unrelated to combat.

Historically, accidents have caused about half of the U.S. military's wartime injuries and deaths. But Rumsfeld's 2003 directive has made an impact, said David S. Chu, the undersecretary of defense for personnel. As a result, "about 26 percent of the losses (in Iraq) result from preventable mishaps," Chu told the Senate Armed Services Committee last February.

Pentagon health officials said the decline was the result of better medical care and efforts to prevent accidents and illnesses. Still, vehicle accidents have killed more troops than insurgent mortar and rocket attacks.

According to Pentagon statistics through mid-December, at least 158 American service members in Iraq have died in vehicle accidents since the war began. Mortar and rocket attacks have killed 156 U.S. service members and wounded more than 1,900.

Enemy fire has wounded more than 16,000 American troops in Iraq. More than half of those returned to duty within three days. Nonbattle injuries and disease had caused the evacuations of 20,449 U.S. troops from Iraq through mid-December, Pentagon statistics show.

Officials estimate that about 25 percent of those who are evacuated for injuries or illnesses eventually return to the combat zone.

As dangerous and unsanitary as battlefield conditions are, better medical care and preventive medicine mean that the rates of nonbattle injuries and disease "have been lower than in any other conflict," Chu said last February.

According to statistics from Army Medical Command, nearly 21,000 soldiers had been evacuated to Army treatment facilities outside Iraq as of Sept. 30, the latest date for which these Army statistics were available. The Army hospital in Landstuhl, Germany, Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington and Brooke Army Medical Center in San Antonio treat most U.S. service personnel who are shipped out of combat zones.

According to the Pentagon, 20 percent of the medical evacuees from Iraq have sustained combat wounds, 18 percent have nonbattle injuries and 62 percent are ill.

In Afghanistan, only 9 percent of the more than 4,460 troops who've been shipped out for medical reasons were evacuated because of combat wounds; 18 percent were evacuated because of nonbattle injuries and 73 percent because of disease.

In Iraq, 45 troops have died of illnesses, according to Pentagon statistics. In Afghanistan, 10 service members have died of illness.

More than 1.2 million American service members have been deployed to Iraq, Afghanistan or nearby countries through Oct. 31.

The Army, which keeps the most detailed evacuation records of any service, lists explosions, gunshots and rocket-propelled grenades as the top three reasons for combat wounds. Bomb blasts account for nearly 67 percent of such wounds.

Medical, surgical and psychiatric reasons constitute the top three reasons for disease evacuations, the Army says. Orthopedic injuries, the need for surgery of all types and dental problems make up the top three reasons for nonbattle injury evacuations, the Army indicates.

Detailed statistics beyond those general categories are difficult to come by. Lt. Col. Scott Ross, a spokesman for U.S. Transportation Command, which handles all medical evacuations, said information on wounds, injuries and illnesses was recorded as troops were shipped out. But the command doesn't keep track of the top specific reasons for evacuations.

"It's too labor-intensive," Ross said.

However, medical researchers who examined data from 2003 found that the typical evacuee from Iraq "was an Army male under the age of 29 requiring orthopedic or surgical care."

Their research, published last June in the journal Military Medicine, found that "disease and non-battle injuries were six times as common as battle injuries, and 94 percent were classified as routine cases."

Injuries and muscle or bone conditions constituted nearly 40 percent of all cases. In addition, 9 percent involved digestive-system disorders, 8 percent were listed as unspecified "symptoms, signs and ill-defined conditions" and 6 percent were found to be nervous-system disorders and mental disorders, according to the researchers.

According to the Army, psychiatric disorders were responsible for 6.6 percent of the medical evacuations from Iraq and 6.8 percent of those from Afghanistan.

A more recent survey found that nearly 35 percent of all U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan reported at least one noncombat injury, with 77 percent of those requiring hospital treatment. Back injury was the biggest complaint, according to an article last May in The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

Researchers for that article found that nearly 75 percent of troops in Iraq and Afghanistan had experienced diarrhea at least once, 69 percent had had respiratory illness and nearly 25 percent had reported requiring intravenous fluids at some point during deployments in 2003-2004.

These findings weren't unusual. Over the past 15 years, the four most commonly reported sicknesses during American military deployments have been noncombat orthopedic injuries, respiratory infections, skin diseases and gastrointestinal infections, according to the researchers.

Historically, more U.S. troops have been lost on the battlefield to accidents and illnesses than to enemy fire. Until modern antibiotics were introduced in World War II, disease routinely killed more troops than bombs or bullets.

During World War II, diseases such as malaria accounted for 85 percent to 92 percent of hospital cases among American troops in the Pacific. During the Korean War, that figure was 75 percent. In Vietnam, disease was responsible for 2 of every 3 hospital admissions from 1965 to 1969, according to a 1972 study of U.S. military medicine during the war.

Wounded soldiers today have a much better chance of surviving. During the Civil War, about half of Union soldiers who were wounded died. During World War II, about 30 percent of Americans wounded in combat died, according to Pentagon statistics. In Vietnam, it was 24 percent.

In Iraq, the ratio of soldiers who are wounded to those who are killed in action is nearly 10 to 1, "the best ever," according to Ellen P. Embrey, the deputy assistant secretary of defense for force health protection and readiness.

There are a number of reasons that more troops are surviving, including better body armor, faster evacuation from the battlefield and improved medicine, military officials and medical experts said.

As of Wednesday, 2,181 U.S. troops had died in Iraq, 1,712 of them by hostile fire, according to the Pentagon. An additional 16,329 were listed as wounded in action, 7,582 of them so severely that they required more than three days of treatment.

The Pentagon says 255 troops have been killed in Afghanistan; 130 of those are listed as combat deaths. In addition, 675 troops have been wounded, with 401 requiring treatment of more than three days.

© 2006, Knight Ridder/Tribune Information Services.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ad

5 more U.S. soldiers were killed today in Iraq!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know the figures but, the flu during WW1 killed millions.

Disease is always worse than a bullet.

sledge

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • OK so I had pancreatectomy in 2003 due to an impacted goldstone 2/3 of my  Pancreas was removed I am type one diabetes with very large scars continued diarrhea stomach problems Constant back and shoulder pain I recently received a Nexus letter from my  endocrinologist related to my service in the gulf war.  Any suggestions or advice from anyone
    • I would like to meet other Hadit members who live in Michigan.  We have at least two major VA Hospitals (Battle Creek, Ann Arbor).  Or maybe you go to the the John Dingell in Detroit.  

      I like Ann Arbor.  I like the fact that most of the doctors there are also at the UM Hospital.  I don't like how uickly they seem to turn over though.  
      • 2 replies
    • Really?
      I am confused.  A few days ago I spoke to a person at a VARO who said if I die from something other than service-connected my husband gets zero, zilch, squat.  Hmmmmmm, it seems the rules change willy-nilly...I have been rated 100% P & T for over 10 years, MS is static, and I am 56 years of age.

      Can a fellow Veteran shed a light on this?

      Thank you.
      • 15 replies
    • Fund raising for HadIt.com
      The site is supported through ads and ad free subscriptions, we are also asking for any support you would like to send our way. You can give a $1 or more it all helps. Keep in mind though that it is NOT tax deductible and we are NOT a non profit. As the site grows so do the costs and ads and subscription do not always keep pace with the costs. Any help is appreciated, but not required.
      • 11 replies
    • Carol Ozanecki- Blue Water vet Advocate called me with this news:

      https://www.stripes.com/news/lawmakers-launch-new-effort-to-provide-agent-orange-coverage-for-blue-water-navy-vets-1.525395

      Also there is a article in Pop Culture she sent to me----mentionig Blue Water vets buy I felt it was too political to post here. You can google it if you want to read it.

       

       
      • 10 replies
×

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines