Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Nsc Adjustment Disorder With Depression & Anxiety?

Rate this question


Rockhound

Question

I currently have a NSC Adjustment Disorder with Depression and Anxiety rated at 50% as it related to a Pension. My question is, If I am able to, now, four plus years later find that it was SC'able as secondary to a TBI claim due to cognitive dysfunction. Would I then have a claim for an EED on the award?

My thinking is that since I wasn't SC for the TBI at the time, four years ago, that no I wouldn't, even though the TBI happened many years prior to the recent claim for SC. What is your thinking on this?

The VA denied SC the TBI back then (they didn't call them TBI back then, rather they called them a cerebral concussion, minor, moderate, or severe), and because there wasn't any residual effects noted at the time, they had not to which they could rate. Of course my thinking is that I should have been SC even at 0% residuals, since I had all the indicators at the time of a brain injury: i.e. unconsious for a period, retrograde amnesia to the injury and a period of time leading up to it, fracture nasal bone showing trauma to frontal region of the head, and EEG tracings that showed adnormal slow wave activity of the frontal region of the brain, even after two follow up exams, head aches for a time acterwards, and moderate impairment to social and industrial adaptability, a condition listed at the time, as probably permanent.

A second question arrises with the last condition listed above. "moderate impairment to social and industrial adaptability, a condtion listed as probably permanent." If I had a moderate impairment to adaptability then and I now have a noted NSC 50% adjustment disorder. Why wasn't it considered for SC instead of NSC, now that residuals were clearly present?

Rockhound Rider :( :o

Are you a paranoid schizophrenic

if the ones you think are out to

get you, really are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

"If I am able to, now, four plus years later find that it was SC'able as secondary to a TBI claim due to cognitive dysfunction. Would I then have a claim for an EED on the award?"

If the VA SCs the residuals of TBI now-this would possibly be the valid basis to file a CUE on the older denial.

If the older denial was based directly on conditions that the VA subsequently awards SC on.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"If I am able to, now, four plus years later find that it was SC'able as secondary to a TBI claim due to cognitive dysfunction. Would I then have a claim for an EED on the award?"

If the VA SCs the residuals of TBI now-this would possibly be the valid basis to file a CUE on the older denial.

If the older denial was based directly on conditions that the VA subsequently awards SC on.

The VA has changed the way in which TBI is evaluated--something that should have been done long ago. I always thought the percentage was too low and deciphering the many residuals somewhat difficult. Well, now the new procedure, I believe, is more generous; however, I have never seen anything this complicated. The VA could have made the new evaluation criteria much simpler--instead it is very complex and evaluators will have a difficult time rating TBI. The text used to support to the TBI decision is too convoluted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I would try and get the adjustment disorder and depression SC'ed first before I worry about CUE or EED's. You have to have a doctor state that your psychiatric disorders are secondary to the TBI. That is step number one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use