Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Sick & Tired Of Va Second Guessing Imo's

Rate this question


Rockhound

Question

I always thought if their was sufficient evidence of record, IMO's, private medical records, etc. to prove onset in service or within the time limit after service, a current diagnosis, and a quantifiable nexus statement, then a C&P exam isn't necessary.

It seems the VARO is using its porogitive, or right, in deciding if a C&P exam is necessary in way to many claims. That they are then using these exams, which tend to be most unfavorable to a Veterans claim, to then use them to deny an otherwise legitimate claim, causing the Veteran to spend countless time and effort in appeals, remands, and even as much as taking their claims all the way to the courts, only to spend more time in directed remands and the likes.

If an IMO is insufficient for rating purposes, then why doesn't the VARO return their reports for the necessary requirements, instead of sending the Veteran to a C&P exam that has to start from page one, when most of the information necessary for the Veterans claim has already been done or covered in the IMO?

If I wasn't already slightly right of paranoid, I would be thinking conspericy or at the very least, colution with the C&P Examiners to give directed opinion in such a manner unfavorable to Veterans.

It's kind of like the chicken house being guarded by the Fox.

It just doesn't make sense any other way. It is quite apparent to me at least that many C&P exams are less than addequate for rating purposes, even to go as far as to not provide the Veteran with necessary tests, exams, specialist reviews and other requirements for a proper opinion, relying more on their own views and what little they deam probative from existing records, non of which comes from sources not controled in some way, shape, or fashion by the VA claims process.

Something stinks and the smell isn't hard to notice from which direction it is coming from.

Rockhound Rider :P :( :P :P :o :o

Edited by Rockhound

Are you a paranoid schizophrenic

if the ones you think are out to

get you, really are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I can waddle like a duck, LoL But I can't run nor flap my wings like a duck. My last experience with water was in one of our city parks by a river. For no other than a stupid reason, they turned on the sprinkler or at least their automatic timers did, in the middle of the day when they shouldn't have and before I could get my chair moving and out of the spray zone, I was as wet as the underside of a duck. It probably look funny to someone watching me, but I wasn't laughing, I could has shorted my chair out with that spray coming up from underneath my chair where the electronics and battery turminals are not that well protected, since the manufacturer figures that the water would be coming from the other direction and going through small puddles wouldn't be a problem either.

Oh yea! If I get hungry enough, I might go down to the park and trap my a duck or two, but otherwise I guess there all safe for now.

Rockhound Rider :D B) :lol: B)

Are you a paranoid schizophrenic

if the ones you think are out to

get you, really are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use