Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Inadequate Reason & Basis

Rate this question


Rockhound

Question

Can you CUE a claim that was denied where by the VA Rater gave an inadequate reason or bases for its decision? Where by the VA Rater failed to adequately discuss evidence in favor of the claim.

Rockhound Rider :D :lol:

Are you a paranoid schizophrenic

if the ones you think are out to

get you, really are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Are you passed the one year mark from the decision? If not file a notice of disagreement and appeal the decision on the ground that you listed. If you are passed the one year point and it is a CUE claim that you are looking at, then you need a lot more that an "inadequate reason for the decision". In my view there is not a clear an unmistakable error there on that basis. CUE claims are very difficult.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Poolguy welcome to Hadit. I agree with you 100%. Going the CUE route is the hardest claim to win in my opinion.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

With filing a CUE vets often stumble into posing questions of judgement or difference of opinion regarding medical evidence. If you are questioning how adequate the reasons and basis of a rating you are getting into judgement calls about existing evidence. Now if there was crucial evidence that the VA had it their posession that they did not consider then I believe you may have a CUE. Regs say the VA must evaluate all the evidence before rendering a decision. So if they don't do that they are violating the regulations. For instance, the VA has your SMR's and they don't bother to use them as evidence in your claim for an in-service injury or illness. They deny your claim without regard to the evidence in your SMR's. Now that to me is CUE. Those records are crucial to your claim, and but for the VA's refulsal to consider them you would have won your claim. That is the level you have to rise to at least. Even in such a case you know the VA is going to fight it because they don't want to award retro back maybe 30 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
With filing a CUE vets often stumble into posing questions of judgement or difference of opinion regarding medical evidence. If you are questioning how adequate the reasons and basis of a rating you are getting into judgement calls about existing evidence. Now if there was crucial evidence that the VA had it their posession that they did not consider then I believe you may have a CUE. Regs say the VA must evaluate all the evidence before rendering a decision. So if they don't do that they are violating the regulations. For instance, the VA has your SMR's and they don't bother to use them as evidence in your claim for an in-service injury or illness. They deny your claim without regard to the evidence in your SMR's. Now that to me is CUE. Those records are crucial to your claim, and but for the VA's refulsal to consider them you would have won your claim. That is the level you have to rise to at least. Even in such a case you know the VA is going to fight it because they don't want to award retro back maybe 30 years.

john999, your 100% correct. I advise vets to appeal and keep the claim active just to avoid this type of situation. The CUE claim is very difficult to win because there are two process- 1. was there a CUE and if so 2. Is there service connection?. You must win two claims to be successful. I have seen a few CUE claims won but the vet lost the service connection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use