Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Regarding Cognitive Dysfunction

Rate this question


Rockhound

Question

When I finally get my consult with the VA Neurologist, how difficult would it be to get him/her to enter a medical statement into my electronic medical records, that is if he/she agrees, that due to my difficulties with cognitive dysfunctions, I would be unabel to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation?

Is this the kind of statement that they are required to make, upon request, since it deals with a Veterans functionalality?

Rockhound Rider :rolleyes:

Are you a paranoid schizophrenic

if the ones you think are out to

get you, really are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

with the VA Neurologist, how difficult would it be to get him/her to enter a medical statement into my electronic medical records?

It would be highly unlikely that a VA neurologist would provide an opinion of any kind for rating. I'm not saying it's impossible. Just not likely.

What will burn you the most, is when you realize how little interest anyone at the VAMC's have in helping you with a claims issue.

Edited by allan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Rock

The neurologist is going to send a report to your PCP. Your PCP knows you so he/she might be the doctor to bring things together and write an opinion for you. I PCP is the one who wrote me a letter telling me the stress test done by VA cardiologist (I think) showed a problem. My PCP's are the ones who have gotten SC for me for a number of conditions and not specialist who don't give a shit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

First off, I have already had the neurological tests that showed cognitive dysfunction and was probably due to trauma.

Rockhound,

Not only are you trying to show SC, you are trying to show such severity as to support unemployability.

How is the dysfunction measured on the existing tests. Do they use such terms as mild, moderate or severe. Are there numeric measurements. How old or recent are these tests. If the tests are old is there a possibility that new tests would show a different result. I am sure a neurologist would run all these questions through the mill.

I also agree that a primary care doctor might be the guy to write this report and it would not suprise me if the neurologist passed you back to primary care for this assessment.

What happened to the C&P process. Are they failing to address these issues by C&P. They could all be addressed by C&P. Also, consider that I am convinced that the RO and the VAMC's computers are of such that the neurologist would be aware that you have a claim with the RO and that the RO should be addressing these issues. It is for this reason that I think asking VA doctors for opinions is hit or miss at best.

Also, what is the current requirement for VA doctors opinions? Does the directive say they must make notations in the electronic record or are they required to make information available to an agency that specifically requests a medical opinion. I had a guy at a VA hospital tell me that they intrepeted the regs to require that doctors make opinions available to agencies requesting the info. I had the director on immunology at one hospital tell me he did not write reports when they were requested by a veteran.

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First off, I have already had the neurological tests that showed cognitive dysfunction and was probably due to trauma. Should read neuropsychiatric tests

Rockhound,

Not only are you trying to show SC, you are trying to show such severity as to support unemployability. At present I do not have a claim in for this for SC. I am only trying to determine if it is as likely as not, that my cognitive dysfunction is the result or culmination of my head injury that, as it so happens, occured during my time in service, that this was the trauma event the neuropsychiatric tester implying about.

How is the dysfunction measured on the existing tests. Do they use such terms as mild, moderate or severe. Are there numeric measurements. How old or recent are these tests. If the tests are old is there a possibility that new tests would show a different result. I am sure a neurologist would run all these questions through the mill. In most areas of cognitive functioning, the test results indicated mild to moderate cognitive dysfunction, but in executive cognitice function, the results showed severe cognitive dysfuntion and the overall findings showed a probable cognitive personality disorder/syndrome and a cognitive depression disorder

I also agree that a primary care doctor might be the guy to write this report and it would not suprise me if the neurologist passed you back to primary care for this assessment.

What happened to the C&P process. Are they failing to address these issues by C&P. They could all be addressed by C&P. Also, consider that I am convinced that the RO and the VAMC's computers are of such that the neurologist would be aware that you have a claim with the RO and that the RO should be addressing these issues. It is for this reason that I think asking VA doctors for opinions is hit or miss at best. Again, there is no claim in for this as of this date. I want to document as much as I can, in my favor hopefully, before I send it to the claims process.

Also, what is the current requirement for VA doctors opinions? Does the directive say they must make notations in the electronic record or are they required to make information available to an agency that specifically requests a medical opinion. YES, to both. I had a guy at a VA hospital tell me that they intrepeted the regs to require that doctors make opinions available to agencies requesting the info. I had the director on immunology at one hospital tell me he did not write reports when they were requested by a veteran. Will have to look up the Directive again, to make sure my memory serves me correctly on this question and/or questions.

Found it:

b. Non-VA Medical Statements. Veterans may request a descriptive statement be put into their electronic health record regarding the current status of an existing medical condition, disease, or injury, that includes a statement of diagnosis, prognosis, and assessment of function for purposes other than VA disability claims.

Rockhound Rider :rolleyes:

Edited by Rockhound

Are you a paranoid schizophrenic

if the ones you think are out to

get you, really are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

b. Non-VA Medical Statements. Veterans may request a descriptive statement be put into their electronic health record regarding the current status of an existing medical condition, disease, or injury, that includes a statement of diagnosis, prognosis, and assessment of function for purposes other than VA disability claims.

Rockhound,

This is the one that I ran into a problem with. The guy at the VA told me that I needed to bring him a form or letter from someone who was evaluating my disability and they would make a response to the requester. He would not schedule any appointments with VA staff otherwise. They intrepeted this to mean that disability claims other than the VA were valid reasons. Gathering these types of reports were limited to disability claims only and not for the purpose of getting statements not associated with an existing claim.

Fortunately, I found a doctor who was willing to write the report for my existing VA claim. Prior to finding this doctor I could not get a report out of VA doctors for five years. I talked to a guy today who said that he has been refused by all his VA doctors to write a report for an existing VA claim. I told him to file for an NSC pension and when he went to that exam to demand a evaluation that his current condition is the result of service. I am pretty sure that the NSC exam is supossed to determine if military service is involved in the etiology of any current condition.

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use