Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Fixing The Va

Rate this question


hurryupnwait

Question

There's a lot of talk these days about fixing the VA. We have very talented people on Hadit and many know about the problems and issues with the VA, so let's start thinking about how to fix them. A Hadit think tank if you will.

When replying could we keep a format such as;

Issue: Slow processing of claims.

Fix: Hire and train more raters.

Cheers

Paul

When I count my blessings I count my family and friends twice.

If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there.

Well done is better than well said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I feel the VAROs should be obligated to state every piece of evidence we send them and then to state how they addressed each piece of evidence.

Most of the problem with shreddergate involved the EP (end product) code taken for work that appeared to be completed but was not even done at all.

As you all know I sent the AMC a full statement and started off with the Fact that "NONE of my medical evidence has ever been addressed or acknowledged by the Buffalo VARO -for this claim -filed in February 2003."

I raised full medical and legal argument, added the Nehmer stipulation stuff for my survivor in case I die and then sent copies of what evidence they should have addressed, and sent additional medical evidence and their own evidentiary case law regarding evidence submissions.

In less then 2 months they have already reviewed my evidence and I am set for a decision.

Of course the decision will reveal if they really reviewed my evidence carefully-

one can never assume-even with considerable evidence-what the VA will do.

My point is that I made a strong demand that my evidence be finally addressed.And maybe it finally was.

A DRO, the VSM and even the Director of my RO had my evidence and yet took no steps at all to even consider it.

I recently was given a 6 months denial time frame from the Regional Counsel to pursue my SF 95 on evidence destruction.The odd thing about that is he already had denied the SF 95 but right after shreddergate he suddenly gave me my rights to file suit.

But I found that VA had used my Agent Orange claim evidence for my CUE claim. ????

Two distinctly separate issues.They didnt destroy my AO evidence-just put it into the wrong claim file.

The legal evidence for my CUE claims is what I can charge them with destroying.

None of that evidence has ever been addressed or mentioned at all.

Someone made decisions at ROs as to wehose evidence will be read and whose would not be.

I think this was a scheme that reached back further then we know.

I was victimized by this same situation in the 1990s.

Critial evidence was continually missing and withheld from VA opining doctors.

A newby or a careless VA employee would not be knowledgable enough to know what they had to withhold.

These decisions were made by higher ups at the ROs.

Only when I became aggressive in the 1990s and also recently with the AMC response did I ever get any of my evidence read at all.

Vetarns and widows have to make sure that they strongly challenge the VA ( VA Watchdog has recommendations on how to do this)if their evidence was not properly addressed.

It doesnt matter if VA shredded it or simply removed it from te C file and put it back after the denial.

If the VA ddnt address it-they violated the basic evidence tenets of VA 101 and no vet or widow shouls suffer from their decision to do that.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I LOVE some of the posts here, especially "Blowing up the VA"!!!

That's to funny! hahahaha :lol:

I was going to post this using a Bulldozer!

It is true though, that WE need to make the change, NOT the Morons that we elect!

Elected officials will not do it on their own, WE need to pressure them to change it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

You know just about everyone that posted had good ideas about fixing the VA. So why can't the people in power do any of these things? I think it is because the don't want to and because they don't give a &^%$.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Issue: I think the VBA is broken and needs to be reorganized.

Fix: I have never thought my medical claim being rated by a non medically trained bureaucrat was a sound idea. I d like to do something like the following:

Step 1. A team would review the claim to see if it meets the three things required for service connection:

1) an in-service event (illness, injury, etc),

2) a current disability, and

3) a nexus, or link, between 1 and 2.

If not, then sent it back with what is needed to meet the requirements.

If yes, then send it to step 2

Step 2. Send the claimant to C&P exams for each medical condition claimed. The C%P examiner would be a doctor that specializes in that field, not a nurse, PA or post graduate resident. The doctor would assign the rating and send it to the RO for final processing.

I would be much more comfortable having a doctor give me a rating, than a bureaucrat at the RO. The VA may have to help train more doctors, but I d rather have them spend money training doctors than training more bureaucrats (raters).

Step 3 If the claimant appealed the rating then he/she would be sent to be examined by other doctors for a second rating. Repeat step two.

Step 4 If the claimant wanted to appeal this decision then it would be sent to BVA.

Any comments or other ideas?

Happy Holidays

Paul

When I count my blessings I count my family and friends twice.

If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there.

Well done is better than well said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Hurryup

If the VA had a medical professional involved in the rating process then it would cost them money. They would rather have some clerk do it, and put the veteran into financial hardship, or die waiting for a decent and competent decision. In the long run it would be cheaper to have doctors involved in rating medical decisions, but the VA does not think in those terms. All they think about is their current budget. That is why it takes ten years to build a VA hospital because they have no long range planning except to make cuts where they can. Your suggestions are all good, but has anyone at the VA ever asked you what you think? They told me to mind my own business when I suggested building a clinic in my part of town.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

John you are obviously an ex government employee that knows he is smarter than the people he is talking to, and they know it, I am surprised they didn't make you an appointment to see a proctoligist so you could be scheduled for an optorectomy thats the operation where they sever the optic nerve with your anus and get rid of that chitty outlook on life you have rofl :P

Edited by Testvet

100% SC P&T PTSD 100% CAD 10% Hypertension and A&A = SMC L, SSD
a disabled American veteran certified lol
"A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dave119 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Brew earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Rowdy01 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Laddib45 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use