Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Gwi Presumptive Question

Rate this question


dtclou

Question

Does Gulf War Illness have to be specifically stated by the Dr as the cause of illness/condition?

I just sent his NOD for all the denials, but wanted to make sure I was right in what I sent.

I thought that GWI is presumed as the cause if there is no underlying cause? & service in GW is documented. Am I wrong?

My husband just got denied for conditions that are all listed under US 11/38 & has been trying to get treatment at VA since 2000. I do not believe any Dr actually said it was GWI, (waiting on rec's) they just ran lots of test (upper GI, colost,etc)never gave him a diagnosis of any of these problems. Decision Letter denied them all as non S/C , but they didn't list them in his claim for GWI - although his claim for GWI was also denied - said don't cause significant disabilities & again saying non S/C (how is GWI not S/C?)

chronic stomach pains, bloating (stuck in @ 10 in colon operation claim- only thing he got approved s/c) they didn't put this in his GWI claim at all.

Repritory problems - no sc

high blood pressure (very young started @ 30 years old) (GWI cardiovascular) - no sc

depression no sc (definaly diagnosised, but said it was from hand surgery, no mention of GWI) I disagreed in NOD , stated GWI caused depression & many factors have aggrevated his depression.

Memory lapses - said C&P said memory fine, answered ? fine. (She told him she couldn't address mental issues/ had to go to psyc - can they even use her statement?) denied in GWI section

mood swings, anxiety, worry, anger control - all conf diag. - but denied for no s/c

(he has many other conditions too - but I know this is getting long)

All of these are listed as presumed conditions of GWI & I wrote in the NOD they should have been put in that group instead of individual.

Am I missing something? Does a Dr have to actually diagnosis GWI as the cause? I already sent the letter, but just 2nd guessing myself & wanted opinions.

Thanks

Edited by dtclou
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 1
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

1 answer to this question

Recommended Posts

GWI is a strange animal.

Since the anthrax 'shots' were made with questionable adjuvants (stuff that makes them work better) I suggest a 'heavy metals burden' test.

MERCURY is a questionable adjuvant and can be removed from the bodies of mammals.

Look up the symptoms and make your own conclusions.

The Department of Da'fence has always gone for the best disease protection for the troops, Gag' and Gasp', and secondary problems, GWI, resulting from that so-called protection is always a problem for the VA, not the military.

I am in the process of trying to discover 'what' they used on us so I can limit the future damage.

The past 32 years of myself fighting this crap has not left very much to save though.

How many disabled vets would not trade their comp check for a healthy body?

I would.

sledge

Those that need help the most are the ones least likely to receive help from the VA.

It's up to us to help each other.

sledge twkelly@hotmail.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ShrekTheTank went up a rank
      Contributor
    • kidva went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use