Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Va Fraud.."smoking Gun"

Rate this question


broncovet

Question

  • Moderator

I recently got a VARO decision from Cleveland RO with a St. Petersburg RO cover page. This seemed more than a little peculiar, and I have been thinking why would this would happen? I am fairly sure these decisions are printed on computer, with the "default" cover page, being the local Regional Office.

Of course, this is a mistake, and I cant help but wonder why one RO would log into another RO's database? To help Veterans? To speed up the claim? Frankly the RO does not give a rip about Veterans.

(Yes I know RO's "farm out" their claims to other RO's, and mine has been farmed out to Virginia and Philadelphia. However, in each case, they told me about it. This time, they did not "farm me out" to St. Pete) Also, when I was "farmed out" to Roanoake RO, Roanoke did all the development and leg work, but then it was sent back to Cleveland for a decision.

I think the most likely reason is VA employee related fraud. To me, it is a "smoking gun".

When I put it in context, the whole thing makes sense: The VARO's denies deserving Veterans, funnels this money into "fake" claims, with large retros, (they have already been caught at doing this!), then "covers it up" by spreading the fake claims, with large retros over multiple Regional Offices, so it does not look like it is coming from one particular VARO. Of course, this would take lots of people in different cities all working this fraud together, but the "fraud pie" would be big enough for many to partake.

YES, I know this all sounds crazy, BUT WHY ELSE would regional Offices be so motivated to delay and deny our claims by the bushel basket full and even shred them? I would like opinions! I have no proof..just a decision from Cleveland with ST. Pete cover page and THOUSANDS of DEserving VETS being denied and delayed.

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

We all have our opinions and those posted previously obviously might be correct.

My opinion is that the reason vets have so many problems with VA claims are:

1. Many VARO personnel are inadequately trained

2. Many VARO personnel are inept due to item number 2 or they just don't have the comprehension to

perform a professional job in evaluating claims

3. Some VARO personnel just don't care

4. Some VARO personnel feel pressure to meet deadlines and end up doing sloppy work

5. Some VARO personnel likely destroyed files because they didn't have the ability to meet the imposed deadlines

6. There are some cases where claims are inadequately supported or prepared. I am glad Hadit is here to help those of us who have had this problem.

I do not think there is a widespread nefarious plot to keep vets from getting their rightful benefits.

Yes, my VARO sucks too...

JMHO

Ron

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Ron, you hold on to that hope.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JBasser,

Yes, I get your drift...and like I said we all have opinions.

I just find it almost impossible for a huge entity like the VA having an undercover program that preempts proper payment of benefits. Even if "they" had a such a program, do you think every one of the hundreds (thousands?) of VA employees could keep it a secret from relatives, friends, or even the news media (in hopes of 15 minutes of fame)? I would be willing to bet that it could not be kept a secret even if it involved only one VARO.

Of course my thoughts on this run parallel to my thoughts on other matters that include:

I believe Oswald was a lone shooter

I believe Extraterrestrials did not land at Area 51

and

I'm confident Mr. Obama is not a citizen of Kenya

Ron

Edited by Ron II

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe Extraterrestrials did not land at Area 51

and

YES THEY DID I SEEN EM AS THEY FLEW OVER MY HOUSE. IT APPEARED THEY WERE HAVING A BIT OF TROUBLE WITH THE SAUCER AS IT WAS A TILT'N A BIT TO THE LEFT. I GUESS YOU COULD SAY THEY DIDN'T LAND CAUSE THEY CRASHED!!! :D B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have seen a lot of claims denied down my way and based upon the amount one would say them ole boys do have a con spear usy

as sure as Elvis it alive.

However, if you stand outside the box and take a good look you will see that about 80 percent of the denials are based upon the first five of six things Ron listed with the remaining contributed to the six reason.

The good ones are so over-worked they can't care. The rest of them are just plain ignorant due to the lack of training or simply being unable to be trained. 60 percent of them could not understand an IMO even if you wrote it in crayon for them (they will some day - about 10 years from now).

The system is and always has been overwhelmed and under funded. However, keep in mind that although it has its uphill battles it is the best disability system in the world. They give you and your family (under certain circumstances) free health care, free meds, they help you buy cars and modify them to suite your disability, they give you scooters, they send you and your family to college etc........ If we could just get congress to care enough to fix the overall system the local VAROs would be more user friendly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

do you think every one of the hundreds (thousands?) of VA employees could keep it a secret from relatives, friends,

They are so under trained that they do not even know there is a problem. The system wide problem is that the VA allows the under training to continue. The under training creates employees who do not know how to develop a claim. The VA calls the process “perfecting “ a claim. The problem is that they really do not care how often they screw it up as long as they give you the right to appeal. What is funny that when you appeal the ask you to tell them how to do their job. The VA saves money by denying claims that are not properly developed. Under trained employees do not benefit the veteran. If you heard the testimony given to the congress from the director of the VA prior to the VCAA you would understand that the people who did not care were at the top of the VA. That is why the VCAA was passed. The director of the VA argued that passing the provisions of the VCAA would cost the VA too much money.

The military and the VA continue to have a hidden agenda of saving the tax payers money by cheating veterans out of benefits. Until such time the military and the VA establishes a system that directs injured soldiers to have their cases reviewed by attorneys and doctors chosen by the lawyers, at the time of discharge or at the time a post service claim is filled, veterans are being cheated out of benefits.

The entire system of directing veterans to doctors chosen by the VA, SO’s not bound by jurisprudence, and raters that are under trained, cheats veterans out of benefits that are rightfully theirs. Injured civilian workers have far superior protections of their rights as injured workers than military personnel and veterans.

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dave119 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Brew earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Rowdy01 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Laddib45 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use