Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Pending Dro Hearing With New Diagnosis

Rate this question


slphelan

Question

Good evening. I need a little help in research.

I was granted a service connection for my right ankle achille's tendonitis 10 % and Facial Scars 0%. I have 4 other items on appeal (Migraine headaches, IBS, Lumbar Strain, and Left ankle instability secondary to sprains) and I am preparing for a DRO hearing for those conditions. I have good medical opinions for these claims to provide a nexus for service connection.

In the interim I have been diagnosed with Osteoarthritis of Bilateral Hips and the Cervical Spine with radiculopathy. I will post my MRI of the Lumbar and C-spine below. Currently treated at the Tampa VAMC for all conditions and my Regional Office is at the Bay Pines VAMC.

My Lumbar Spine MRI confirmed Degenerative disc disease and degenerative joint disease Cervical Spondolysis. Left posterolateral annular fissure and small protrusion of L3-L4; L5-S1 spondylitis bulge and left paracentral protrusion that may impinge on s1 nerve. Bilateral frontal encroachment on L5 nerves, and clinical correlation suggested. Suspected Filum terminale lipoma.

C-spine MRI # 1 revealed: Moderate multilevel degenerative change with compromise of the ventral subarachnoid space and neural, and encroachment on the spinal cord. Disc osteophyte complex C3-C4, C4-C5, and C5-C6. C6-C& bony spurring and broad central protrusion.

C-Spine MRI # 2 revealed: The patient has a congenitally narrow cervical canal secondary to short pedicles throughout the cervical spine. Stable multilevel disc disease is seen from C3-4 through C6-7 as described earlier. There is evidence of canal and foraminal stenoisis without significant interval change. The MRI signal within the cervical cord is normal. There is no evidence of intradural mass lesion or cervical cord edema or myelomalacia. Intervetebral discs and motion segments: C2-3 and C3-4: The C2-3 disc level is unremarkable. At C3-4 there is a broad bulge touching but not compressing the ventral cord. There is bilateral foraminal narrowing secondary to uncovetebral joint hypertrophy. C4-5 and C5-6: At C4-5 there is a broad disc bulge with asymmetric spondylitic protrusion and osteophyte complex to the right causing indentation of the ventral portin right lateral recess stenosis. There is marked compression of the right C5 nerve root and moderate canal stenosis. At C5-6 there is a broad disc bulge indenting the ventral cord with moderate canal stenosis. C6-7 There is a broad spondylitic disc bulge and osteophyte complex causing ventral indentation of the cord and mild to moderate canal stenosis.

My questions are:

I had no service injury disease for my Cervical or the Osteoarthritis of my hips: Other than 22 years of repetitive trauma in service. I did have multiple injuries to my lumbar spine but on initial submission was denied a service connection.

1. Would I file these as secondary to my Right ankle instability for which I have a service connection?

2. Should I wait until after the DRO hearing to see if I am granted service connection for my back strain?

3. Is there any research that will show a nexus to ankle, hip, lumbar, and cervical degeneration?

4. Do the neck and back qualify for Intevetebral disc syndrome?

5. What would be the appropriate way to file for service connection since I have been granted one and have a DRO hearing pending?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

One very simple question to ask.

When did you get out?

If the VA/VAMC has found these things within the first year it will simplify the issue of service connection.

Since arthritis is a chronic disease if it is diagnosed or you can prove conclusively that you had it within the first post year it is direct service connection not secondary.

Best regards,

Tyler

I got out active in 1995 and Retired from the USAR in 1999. Not presumptive within the first year post discharge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use