Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Va Will Pay $20 Million To Settle

Rate this question


Wings

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

x

x

x

WASHINGTON (CNN) http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/01/27/va....ref=mpstoryview

-snip-

The Department of Veterans Affairs has agreed to pay $20 million to current and former military personnel to settle a class action lawsuit on behalf of the men and women whose personal data was on a laptop computer stolen during a burglary.

The names, dates of birth and Social Security numbers of about 26.5 million active duty troops and veterans were on the laptop and external drive, which disappeared while in the custody of a Veterans Affairs data analyst in 2006.

"The defendants [VA] have agreed to pay a lump sum of $20 million to the plaintiffs inclusive of fees and costs in exchange for the dismissal of this litigation," according to the settlement document.

The funds will go to military personnel and veterans who were harmed by the loss of personal data, either through emotional distress or through costs incurred in monitoring credit records.

Gov't Doles Out $20M to Settle Suit Over Private VA Data Leak

http://www.ecommercetimes.com/story/securi...?wlc=1234735621

-snip-

The payments will range from $75 to $1,500 for up to 26.5 million veterans who incurred out of pocket expenses for credit monitoring or physical symptoms of emotional distress. In exchange, lawyers for the veterans agreed to drop their class-action lawsuit alleging invasion of privacy in a case involving the government's largest data security breach.

The judge's move Tuesday means that lawyers will now notify veterans of the settlement in newspapers and magazines around the country. Once veterans submit their claims, lawyers for both sides will return to court in July for final approval for the payments.

Under the $20 million deal, lawyers for the veterans will receive up to $5.5 million for fees and costs, while roughly $1.4 million will be spent to notify millions of veterans and provide information about the settlement via advertisements in newspapers, magazines and a toll-free hot line.

Any remaining amount after claims are paid will be donated to the Fisher House Foundation, which provides temporary housing for families of veterans receiving medical care at VA hospitals and other facilities, as well as The Intrepid Fallen Heroes Fund, which is building a new center in Bethesda, Md., that will be devoted to treatment and research of traumatic brain injury.

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Amazing...

When I got a copy of my husband's C-file, it had medical records of OTHER veterans in it - complete with names, addresses, birthdates, and Social Security numbers.

I sent the VA an IRIS informing them of such - and asked:

1. Could they please check the files of THOSE veterans and see if my husband's discharge physical might happen to be in THEIR file.

2. What they VA wanted me to DO with the medical records and personal information of the OTHER veterans.

Of course, they did not respond to either question.

They merely told me I had received the entire file and there was nothing further they could do to provide me with a copy of my husband's discharge physical.

So I guess I get to keep the information about the OTHER veterans.

I was considering mailing the medical records (of the OTHER veterans) to the OIG - along with the copy of the IRIS I sent - and tell them the VA had not informed me what they want me to do with the confidential medical and personal records of strangers they had sent me - and I was tired of being the keeper of such sensitive information on behalf of the VA. And ask the OIG if they would be willing to relieve me of the responsibility of safeguarding other vets personal data for the VA.

Free

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amazing...

When I got a copy of my husband's C-file, it had medical records of OTHER veterans in it - complete with names, addresses, birthdates, and Social Security numbers.

I sent the VA an IRIS informing them of such - and asked:

1. Could they please check the files of THOSE veterans and see if my husband's discharge physical might happen to be in THEIR file.

2. What they VA wanted me to DO with the medical records and personal information of the OTHER veterans.

Of course, they did not respond to either question.

They merely told me I had received the entire file and there was nothing further they could do to provide me with a copy of my husband's discharge physical.

So I guess I get to keep the information about the OTHER veterans.

I was considering mailing the medical records (of the OTHER veterans) to the OIG - along with the copy of the IRIS I sent - and tell them the VA had not informed me what they want me to do with the confidential medical and personal records of strangers they had sent me - and I was tired of being the keeper of such sensitive information on behalf of the VA. And ask the OIG if they would be willing to relieve me of the responsibility of safeguarding other vets personal data for the VA.

Free

That's a good idea. I would do that and maybe send a notification to the lawyers who handled this other claim. I know that comprimising SSN #'s is a big deal anymore not to mention confidential medical information.

s/ Mags

We kept our promise and served honorably. Now it is time for the VA to keep their's!

I am not an attorney or VSO and offer my opinions free of charge. Any advice I provide in my posts is from experiences I have had with the VA or I have the knowledge that others have encoutered. I accept no liability for this advice should you chose to follow it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Free

I agree with purple. The VAOIG needs to know how sloppy the RO's are at treating our sensitive information, so those records should be sent to the appropriate Veterans, and these Veterans certainly deserve special claims handling for shredded documents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use