Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

How Many More Years Will Congress & Vet Orgs Take Being Ignored By Va

Rate this question


allan

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Read article & Post your response

http://www.health.mil/Press/Release.aspx?ID=554

How many more years will congress & Vet Orgs take being ignored by VA

bureaucrats

-----Original Message-----

From: Thomas Bandzul [mailto:thomas221@yahoo.com]

Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 2:04 PM

To: 'Robert P. Walsh'; 'Colonel Dan'

Subject: RE: Dan Cedusky has submitted a comment on Health.mil and would

like you to know about it

Counselor,

You're comments are spot on. If you tried to devise a scheme with the

intent of denying claims, hiding the truth, discouraging applications,

covering up facts used to help promote the truth and flat out lied to the

public, this would be an accurate depiction of the VA today. Yet this is

not a system because even the worst designed structure for benefits

adjudication has a balance of rules. Old adage has something to do with "if

it's not in balance, it will fall". Some may argue the VA has rules but I

would offer, they are not being followed.

The VA is a failure in meeting the needs of veterans. If allowed to

continue on the present course, the failure will be a catastrophe. In the

last eight years the damage done by the VA to the American public, city

governments, and state agencies, as well as veterans, is horrific and in

many instance, criminal. Why local governments haven't voice their

collective, angry opposition defies explanation. The same question needs to

be asked of the 45 charter VSO's and the 22 non-charter with congressional

recognition. The largest of the VSO's are more worried about their dues

paying population than the people they are charter to help, which is much

the way the VA is structured.

Had it not been for the small and underfunded efforts of groups like VCS,

Veterans and Military Families for Progress, NOVA, NVLSP, IAVA, One Freedom,

VVA and is some small measure, the DAV, the appalling nature of the

treatment veterans would be worse. Some may think it couldn't get much

shoddier but I believe it could and might, if a constant vigil isn't

maintained over this congress. The pledges of the past administration never

came to fruition and the promises of this administration, while magnanimous,

have yet to be delivered on.

Regards,

Thomas

Thomas E. Bandzul

General Counsel, Empowering Veterans

6316 Blackburn Ford Drive

Fairfax Station, VA. 22039

Office - 703-503-7969

Cell - 703-474-4264

Fax - 703-825-1157

-----Original Message-----

From: Robert P. Walsh [mailto:rpwalsh@sbcglobal.net]

Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 1:33 PM

To: Colonel Dan

Cc: Bandzul, Thomas

Subject: FW: Dan Cedusky has submitted a comment on Health.mil and would

like you to know about it

Dan:

What we encounter with "Project Salute" as we travel the country and

interact with veterans and their families is just what you would expect.

Homeless vets and others who have "dropped out". Their efforts to obtain VA

compensation benefits and health care were wrongfully denied on the first

few attempts, and they are unable or unwilling to navigate the horrific VA

system. Or they accepted as correct the VA decision denying them benefits.

Why can an attorney win a VA benefits case in 6 months for a WW II combat

vet who has been denied repeatedly for 60 years? Because the VSO's have

failed miserably to meet their obligations to these families. And they have

tolerated the delay and incompetence by the VBA. We are all to blame, as we

tolerate this insult to our veterans.

The old VA benefits system was designed so that the initial medical

examination for vets applying for benefits was the same as the exam given

when they were accepted into service. The conditions identified by the VA

doctor were then rated. How far we have strayed from this honest approach.

The modern system, in place since Vietnam, is to play "hide the ball" and

place the burden upon the back of the disabled veteran to make a claim for

each condition. What garbage. It is this practice that has resulted in

most of the wrongfully denied claims, or the long delay in getting all of

the service related conditions claimed and rated. What Ken Carpenter calls

the "gotcha" claims processing system of the VA.

The general medical examination protocol in the VA C & P system is never

used. At least I have never found an example of it being used in any of the

files I have reviewed. Only the narrow and specific exams are ever ordered

to be given by the VARO.

Of course, any veteran who does offer specific medical information about his

condition is admonished and told that he or she is a lay person. A

professional medical opinion is required, that he or she is not competent to

comment on this medical matter.

The opinion of the treating physician of the veteran is also given no

deference, unlike the Social Security Administration, which has a treating

physician rule. Why does the VA refuse to adopt this evidentiary standard?

Because they have a system in which registered nurses and general

practitioners with minimal contact with the patient are allowed to provide

opinions to overrule those of board certified specialists provided by

veterans.

It is truly a shameful and incompetent system, if it can be called a system.

Maybe "scheme" is a better word, as the obvious intent of the VBA process is

to deny veterans and their families their benefits.

Robert P. Walsh

Two West Michigan Avenue

Suite 301

Battle Creek, Michigan 49017

Telephone (269) 962-9693

Telecopier (269) 962-9592

E-mail: rpwalsh@sbcglobal.net

-----Original Message-----

From: NoReply@health.mil [mailto:NoReply@health.mil]

Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 12:18 PM

To: colonel-dan@sbcglobal.net; rpwalsh@sbcglobal.net

Cc: comments@whitehouse.gov

Subject: Dan Cedusky has submitted a comment on Health.mil and would like

you to know about it

---------------------------------------------------

The following comment was submitted on Health.mil. It may take up to 1

business day for the comment to be reviewed and posted. To view the related

article go to:

http://www.health.mil/Press/Release.aspx?ID=554

---------------------------------------------------

Why even 100 days? You have the patient in front of you. Too many people in

the decision process?

Far too many veterans with PTSD in Jail today, that fell thru the cracks,

general discharges, personality disorders, etc.. almost criminal they way

many have been treated..or NOT treated. How many claims does the VA have

that are 10 years+ old...absolutely criminal. How many homeless veterans

have claims pending? for how long?

"Keep on, Keepin' on"

Dan Cedusky, Champaign IL "Colonel Dan"

See my web site at:

http://www.angelfire.com/il2/VeteranIssues/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

0 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There have been no answers to this question yet

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use