Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Dm 2 & Calcified Veins

Rate this question


Toposurveyor

Question

To all,

I'm just looking for some information for now.

Just over a year ago, I had an ankle/brachial index (ABI) done and the results were 0.93 lt ankle and 1.0 rt ankle. It was my impression that I was on my way to peripheral artery disease (PAD). Talked to my PCP at the VAMC and had another ABI done last October. The results were 1.25 lt and 1.33 rt.

In a conversation last week with the technition who did both of these tests, she advised that I was looking at calcification, NOT PAD.

My question, has anyone here with DM2 had this problem. And if so, can it be sc'd if my DM 2 is sc'd?

For your information, I am sc'd for DM2, PN for both lower exremities, Deputeren's contracture for both hands, and HBP. My combined total is 70%.

Thanks for your ideas.

Ed

Edited by Toposurveyor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Ed -I think you should claim this - I suggest you read this article carefully and save it to support the claim- there is much more on the net on this- a subject I am very familiar with:

http://www.60daystolowercholesterol.com/co...cification.html

Calcification- in your case (and I am not a doctor) would be as likely as not (my opinion) due directly to your DMII as it is often the beginning of atherosclerotic heart disease and it is treatable.What th medical community knows today about cholestrol etc can help with this problem and you might not have any ratable level of disability from it-but by all means file the claim and let VA determine that to protect your EED.The article supports what I mean.

If you have ever had an ECHO done, that shows better the extent of any narrowing of the arteries due to you DMII, as an ECHO is a measurement and an Ejection Fraction.

Are you still working Ed? and if not have you formally applied for TDIU at the 100% comp rate?

And dont hesitate to request the SMC "K" award if you have ED, Ed.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Get a CT scan done and that will show blockages. You can get this secondary to DMII. If you have it in the legs you may have it in the heart and brain. I got a 60% rating for heart disease secondary to DMII and it started with a CT scan of my leg.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berta & john999,

Thanks for your reply and information.

I will see my pvt Dr in a couple months. (He is the Dr tht diagnosed my DM2 originally.) Hopefully he will write a favorable IMO and I will take it to my VSO.

No, I am not working, having been retired since 9/1999. I have not filed for TDIU as I have a comfortable existance on my pension. It is probable that I could be employable, although not as a surveyor, which was what I was from 1964 until my retirement. But, I do have ED. However it is not from my DM2 or the meds I take. It is Peyronie's disease, and there seems to be no connection with my DM2.

Ed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use