Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Maybe This Is Why I Haven't Gotten Anywhere In 10 Years

Rate this question


carlie

Question

http://www.va.gov/oig/publications/press-release.asp?id=28

oig_seal_bw_120.gif

U.S. Department Of Veterans Affairs

Office of Inspector General

Office of Investigations

Washington, DC 20420

(202) 565-7702

Tuesday, March 02, 1999

Former VA Claims Examiner Pleads Guilty to Theft, Mail Fraud and Money Laundering

Richard J. Griffin,

Inspector General, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), announced today that Joy C. Brown, Supervisory Veterans Claims Examiner, VA Regional Office, St. Petersburg, FL, pleaded guilty to charges of theft, mail fraud and money laundering in connection with her theft of $615,472 from VA.

Brown, a former supervisor with the VA disability claims section, admitted that she created computerized records, which fraudulently reflected that her fiancé, a police officer, was a 100% service-connected disabled veteran. She then caused VA to make direct-deposit payments into a joint bank account maintained in both of their names.

Brown used the proceeds to purchase several expensive items, which included a lakefront home, a motorcycle, two automobiles, and two engagement rings.

Other proceeds were used to make renovations to Brown's home, such as building a second story onto the home and installing a swimming pool. In addition to these expenditures, she had the home professionally landscaped.

As a condition of the plea agreement, Brown will be required to forfeit all of the above items including $68,000 in U.S. currency and travelers checks, which is already in the possession of the Government.

Griffin noted there was no evidence reflecting the fiancé knew anything about the scheme.

Griffin stated the VA Program Fraud Task Force, Tampa, FL, investigated the case.

The Task Force, formed to combat fraud against the United States Government, is comprised of special agents from VA Office of Inspector General, the Postal Inspection Service, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

Assistant United States Attorney Robert A. Mosakowski, Tampa, FL, handled the prosecution of the case.

Edited by carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 26
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I agree.

And the really sad part is not knowing how many of those deserving Vets that have died and had valid claims denied by this Supervisor and never got a chance to see their "earned" entitlements and benefits...

She was not a rating specialist, therefore the only claim she could award or deny were administrive (pension) claims. She had to create an award for her boyfriend. Therego, Veteran Service Representives can no longer input (cest) and approve awards. You either have one command or the other. VETSNET (the new system) make the process harder to defraud.

"Don't give up. Don't ever give up." Jimmy V

Link to comment
Share on other sites

She was not a rating specialist, therefore the only claim she could award or deny were administrive (pension) claims. She had to create an award for her boyfriend. Therego, Veteran Service Representives can no longer input (cest) and approve awards. You either have one command or the other. VETSNET (the new system) make the process harder to defraud.

The article doesn't say whether she was a rating specialist or not. It says she is "a former supervisor with the VA disability claims section". This could make her a Coach (full supervisor) or a Super Senior (an assistant of sorts that does a lot of the leg work). Either one could have been in the right section to authorize rating decisions, and not just pension claims.

Pension claims have moved to St. Paul unless it is a dual claim (Comp and Pension). Very unlikely that Pension was the award as it is such a small benefit (and because the article says that it made her boyfriend 100% s/c), there is no extended period of backpay, and it would have been caught when we cross reference with the IRS or SSA. Not caught immediately, but before it got that large. Besides that, it would have taken approximately 51 years to amass that kind of amount from Pension.

VSR's can CEST and authorize awards. I CEST all the time, and I authorize one or two days out of the week. We do have both commands. Without both commands, claims would be even slower than they are right now. Lastly, VETSNET really only makes the awards process easier to carry out. The award that she would have had is a BDN (old system) award. VETSNET conversions have only been going on since April of 2008.

The only way I can figure that she got caught is that she got greedy, and went back to the cookie jar for more.

Edited by Meddac
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The article doesn't say whether she was a rating specialist or not. It says she is "a former supervisor with the VA disability claims section". This could make her a Coach (full supervisor) or a Super Senior (an assistant of sorts that does a lot of the leg work). Either one could have been in the right section to authorize rating decisions, and not just pension claims.

Pension claims have moved to St. Paul unless it is a dual claim (Comp and Pension). Very unlikely that Pension was the award as it is such a small benefit (and because the article says that it made her boyfriend 100% s/c), there is no extended period of backpay, and it would have been caught when we cross reference with the IRS or SSA. Not caught immediately, but before it got that large. Besides that, it would have taken approximately 51 years to amass that kind of amount from Pension.

VSR's can CEST and authorize awards. I CEST all the time, and I authorize one or two days out of the week. We do have both commands. Without both commands, claims would be even slower than they are right now. Lastly, VETSNET really only makes the awards process easier to carry out. The award that she would have had is a BDN (old system) award. VETSNET conversions have only been going on since April of 2008.

The only way I can figure that she got caught is that she got greedy, and went back to the cookie jar for more.

Prior to Veterans Service Representatives, we were called claim examiners. Trust and believe, she was a VSR. If you have the ability to CEST, you should not have the ability to approve (except in appeals). You may be able to input, but CEST? (CVSR) B)

You took totally out of content the anwer to another question :P . Reread the post. I did not say it was a pension award. I stated that as a Senior Claim Examiner she could only grant administrative awards. One thing is for sure, she is not a rating specialist. If so it would have taken someone eles to be in on the scheme. You know what I mean.

"Don't give up. Don't ever give up." Jimmy V

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cash Cow

Insight on the News , August 16, 1999 by Amy R. Gershkoff

Poor staff supervision at the Department of Veterans' Affairs, or VA, has opened the door for claims supervisors to create fictional veterans in schemes that have cost the government more than $1.2 million.

A Florida VA employee was arrested in June for doling out more than $600,000 to her fiance in a fake claim, as was a New York employee who created a fictional veteran to conceal her disbursement of more than $620,000.

The inspector general, or IG, cites the downsizing of VA as the reason for the increase in fraud. The number of VA employees has been cut by more than 20 percent during the last six years.

Were it not for their chance discovery, the deceptions could have "continued indefinitely without detection" according to the IG's office. Federal agents uncovered the fraud during the arrest of George Cox, a former VA staff member facing drug charges. Cox was carrying a fraudulent veteran ID card at the time of his arrest. His arrest led to the scrutiny of the entire department.

Regardless of the recent disclosures, Joseph Thompson, VA undersecretary for benefits, says, "I don't see it as a systemic problem."

"Don't give up. Don't ever give up." Jimmy V

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

It would take 22 years to accumulate over 600,000 and I still do not believe that the boy friend did not know it.

It's like saying Bernie Madoff is the only one in on 50 Billion scheme.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use