Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Need Input

Rate this question


bern381

Question

I been seeing a psych doc outside of the VA system in order to gain evidence to bolster my claim. The doc has said that she will write me an IMO after she gets to know me. In the mean time, she has written a short letter to support my claim of depression secondary to chronic pain from service connected disabilities. However, before I submit it as evidence I would like to ask you all to review it to see if it passes muster. Here it goes:

To Whom It May Concern,

I met with xxx xxx for an initial psychiatric on February 17, 2009 regarding his depressive symptoms and anger issues. At that time, I diagnosed him with Depressive Disorder NOS, rule out pain disorder associated with psychological factors and general mediical condition. Based on his self-reported lack of any psychological history prior to the onset of his shoulder pain, it does appear that his mood symptoms were at least partially precipitated by the onset of pain and have been perpetuated by the chronic nature of the pain and his preoccupation and frustration with his unsuccessful attempts to alleviate it. Most likely, there are also yet other underlying factors that perhaps the focus of pain is covering up. His depressive symptoms and preoccupation with his pain have led to impairments in work productivity as well as issues with interpersonal relationships.

xxx xxx, D.O.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I been seeing a psych doc outside of the VA system in order to gain evidence to bolster my claim. The doc has said that she will write me an IMO after she gets to know me. In the mean time, she has written a short letter to support my claim of depression secondary to chronic pain from service connected disabilities. However, before I submit it as evidence I would like to ask you all to review it to see if it passes muster. Here it goes:

To Whom It May Concern,

I met with xxx xxx for an initial psychiatric on February 17, 2009 regarding his depressive symptoms and anger issues. At that time, I diagnosed him with Depressive Disorder NOS, rule out pain disorder associated with psychological factors and general mediical condition. Based on his self-reported lack of any psychological history prior to the onset of his shoulder pain, it does appear that his mood symptoms were at least partially precipitated by the onset of pain and have been perpetuated by the chronic nature of the pain and his preoccupation and frustration with his unsuccessful attempts to alleviate it. Most likely, there are also yet other underlying factors that perhaps the focus of pain is covering up. His depressive symptoms and preoccupation with his pain have led to impairments in work productivity as well as issues with interpersonal relationships.

xxx xxx, D.O.

If you haven't filed a claim, wait and get the proper documentation. Look at Berta's section on IMO's.

If you have I don't think I would send this in, I don't think it will help. What does the underlined section refer to, it doesn't appear to help your claim. It says to me that there are other causes to your depression then pain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Most likely, there are also yet other underlying factors that perhaps the focus of pain is covering up.

This statement is rather vague. I do not see how it would hurt in the long run unless the underlying factors are identified and given separate GAF's.

================================================================================

==

At that time, I diagnosed him with Depressive Disorder NOS, rule out pain disorder associated with psychological factors and general mediical condition

This sounds like a "provisional diagnosis". She is saying that she needs more time treating you to make an accurate diagnosis.

I am not sure the VA will use a provisional diagnosis.

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Hoppy and Bern, interesting discussion and good question. My first claim psych c&p after discharge(years ago) was weird.

Bern, do you have a copy of the VA compensation exam for depression? Hope this helps http://www.vba.va.gov/bln/21/Benefits/exams/disexm37.htm

Best to ya,

Cowgirl'up2009!

Edited by cowgirl

For my children, my God sent husband and my Hadit family of veterans, I carry on.

God Bless A m e r i c a, Her Veterans and their Families!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the input, it is greatly appreciated. I'm sorry I didn't give more background. I filed this claim more than two years ago. For the last 14 months it has been pending a DRO review. If I had to do it over, I would opt for a DRO hearing. Anyhow, I was hoping to use this letter to bolster my claim when it is reviewed. My psych doc at the VA clinic changed my diagnosis to depression, caused by chronic pain. Do you think that this letter will support her assertions? I realize that some portions of the letter are vague and I am worried that it could be used against me. However, some of the statements in the letter are very supportive. Will the positives outweigh the negatives? As far as the last statement in the letter (may be other underlying factors) I think she made the statement because I am a new patient and she is still getting to know me. If I could get her to delete the last statement, would the letter be supportive? Thanks, Bern381

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

My 2 cents worth: The VA likes to hear the words, "The Veterans condition is at least as likely as not related to military service" Since your doc did NOT say that, but, I will admit it is close..maybe even

"close enough for the government" if your pain condition is SC'd..however it does leave the door open that other conditions could be also causing your pain. I think it depends on the sympathy of the rater, and the RO, and how they interpret the "favor the Veteran" rule. My experience has been the "favor the Veteran" rule is interpreted by the RO as "forget the Veteran", but others have had a much better experience than I have. IMHO if your RO is Cleveland, New York, Detroit, or St. Pete..make plans for a LONG LONG fight and a denial. However, if your RO is Maine or New Mexico, start looking at new cars for your Retro payment, as the last two states RO's are very liberal at approving Veterans claims while the first four are Veterans "Christmas Busters"..the Terrible 4 RO's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I would NOT submit this letter as I feel VA would

relate it as a negative on a claim for depression secondary to pain.

jmho,

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use